The MGLG Logo - a pair of Goosander

MOOR GREEN LAKES GROUP

[Home]       [Annual Reports Index]       [Contents List]       [Last Year's Report]       [Next Year's Report]


 

This 10th Anniversary report has been sponsored by RMC Aggregates (Southern) Ltd.

The Moor Green Lakes Nature Reserve was born out of the extraction of sand and gravel by RMC. The 36 ha. site was designed for such conservation purposes from the outset.

RMC wishes to acknowledge the major contribution made over the last decade by members of the Moor Green Lakes Group to the increasing interests of the Reserve and looks forward to continuing the partnership in the years ahead.

 

RMC Aggregates Southern,) Ltd

RMC House

Coldharbour Lane

Thorpe, Egham

SurreyTW20 8RA

 

Tel. 01932 583600

 


[Previous Year]       [Previous Section]       [Contents List]         [Next Section]         [Next Year]

CHAPTER 1

INTRODUCTION TO THE TENTH REPORT OF THE

MOOR GREEN LAKES GROUP

Ken Crick
Chairman of the Moor Green Lakes Group 

It is with some sadness that I commit pen to paper as I relinquish the role of Chairman of the Group. Your new chairman will be Peter Scott, who will be well known to the volunteers who work on the Reserve, and who, I am sure, will make an excellent chairman.

This report marks the tenth anniversary of the Group’s formation. Kevin Briggs has kindly produced a summary of developments over the ten years, presented as an Annex within the report.

This year has been the first in which work was guided by the new Management Plan. We succeeded in completing all the scheduled tasks and some unforeseen extras. One of those extras was the result of the summer break-in to Colebrook Hide, when one view-port hatch was completely destroyed. Entry was achieved through the hatch provided for disabled members, hence the increased strands of barbed wire in. front of this port. The: perpetrators also left some unpleasant personal waste behind them. Towards the end of the summer the hide was left unlocked on a number of occasions. I. can only beg members to be extra vigilant when leaving the hides ensuring they are locked, with all of the combination digits frilly scrambled, A second failed attempt to gain entry to the hide, by forcing the door, was made over the Christmas Holiday period, the door and jam receiving further damage.

Just before Christmas we lost the services of Amanda and Julian Simpson-Atkins, who have led work parties on the reserve for eight years. We wish them well in their new life in Shropshire.

Casual observations recorded toad spawn for the first time on the north shore of Colebrook Lake North at pH Measuring Station A2 (see Appendix F, 2001 Report). Large numbers of whirligig beetles were also in evidence.

All the recorders are to be congratulated and thanked for their sterling efforts throughout the year, as are those of you that complete the monthly sighting record sheets in the hides. Without this input from recorders and members this report and an objective and focused management of the reserve would not be possible.

I would like to thank the members of the committee for their assistance and support throughout my two-year tenure. Also the Blackwater Valley Countryside staff for their advice and work-party leadership, along with those members whose voluntary work on the reserve maintains the diverse habitats and associated wildlife, while keeping the site visibly accessible to members and the general public.

This year’s AGM was followed by a succinct and thought-provoking talk on biodiversity, given by Andy Glencross, Wokingham District Council’s Biodiversity Officer. He helped to put into context our small efforts within the overall thrust for nature conservation within the UK.


[Previous Year]       [Previous Section]       [Contents List]         [Next Section]         [Next Year]

CHAPTER 2

CONSERVATION WORK PROGRAMME

APRIL 2002 TO MARCH 2003

 Sue Dent

The most important contribution to the site management this year was the introduction of the Moor Green Lakes Management Plan, which represents a real step forward in the management of the site. It has been put together by a team led by Ken Crick, who then wrote the plan itself. In its first year the Plan has provided a structure to the work on the reserve and a real incentive, showing that jobs were being done and targets achieved. After its first year of operation the plan will be revised to iron out any wrinkles that have been found and it will then run for five years.

A thank you.. and a farewell

As always the conservation work on the reserve has been enthusiastically supported by volunteers on both the regular Sunday tasks run by the Moor Green Lakes Group and on Tuesdays with the Blackwater Valley Countryside Volunteers. A total of 14 tasks were attended by an average of 11 volunteers - a tremendous total of 155 volunteer days and a huge amount of management work done on the site. Many thanks to everyone who has come along and to the group committee who organise the work to be done so efficiently 

In December Amanda and Julian Simpson-Atkins moved away from the area. Amanda has led the Sunday work parties on Moor Green for three years and has made a huge contribution to the success of the group, not least by helping to establish such a friendly and welcoming atmosphere that volunteers have wanted to keep coming back. They will be sorely missed.

Conservation Tasks

  • Keeping islands clear of vegetation. A special effort was made this year to catch up with work on the islands. Tern Island and Plover Island have both been cleared of vegetation to provide the open shingle preferred by breeding birds. Two paths have been cleared across Grove Lake Island; again it is hoped to provide habitat for breeding birds. It was also possible to tackle a substantial area of Long Island, in part thanks to the work of a party of students from Farnborough College of Technology who practised their management skills very effectively on the bramble and gorse.

  • Cutting viewing slots alongside the lake, the volunteers cleared one area with the remainder done by Julian Simpson-Atkins as a contractor.

  • Grassland. The small meadow next to Colebrook Hide was cut and raked this year. A cut every 3 years will maintain it as rough grassland rather than scrub. The battle with encroaching bramble and scrub on the grassland and willow around the edge of the lake continues, with some substantial areas cleared this year.

  • Grazing. It was possible to graze the site rather earlier than usual this year, which meant that the cattle (and calves this year) had time to do their job and leave the site before the ground became too wet and liable to poaching. Many thanks to the volunteers who helped us with checking the cattle during their stay. They are a great bonus to the site management, but we couldn’t manage them without volunteer help in keeping an eye on them.

  • Around the Reserve. The area around the entrance to Colebrook Hide was cleared and it is hoped that regular cutting in future will keep the area open. Another stretch of hedge, on the footpath south of Colebrook Hide, has been laid.

  • Crassula. The only real cloud on the horizon from the point of view of the management of the reserve is Crassula helmsii, which will be an on-going battle for the foreseeable future. Progress has been slow this year, but we now have permission from the Environment Agency to use herbicide to kill Crassula where it grows along the shoreline. It is hoped that this will limit the impact on bird populations by keeping the scrapes reasonably clear and open. The experiment with using carpet to smother Crassula on Grove Lake has worked, partially. The weed under the carpet is dead, but more has established itself on top. The carpet will be carefully removed in Spring (2003) and any remaining areas will be spot-sprayed.


[Previous Year]       [Previous Section]       [Contents List]         [Next Section]         [Next Year]

 CHAPTER 3

REPORT ON BIRDS FOR 2002

 Dr Ian Brown

At the beginning of the year duck numbers were generally down compared to recent years, but nevertheless there was still a good variety on offer including a record count for the site of 54 Shoveler in February and a Pintail. Goosander still roosted in moderate numbers throughout. There was a very good selection of other species including Barn Owl, Peregrine, a large flock of Brambling, Merlin (only second recorded individual on the site), Mediterranean Gull and Bittern, while the Green Winged Teal remained until late January.

Considering the water levels were relatively high throughout the spring, there was a good selection of passage waders in quality if not quantity, including Black Tailed Godwit, 3 Oystercatchers, an early Wood Sandpiper, Curlew, Greenshank, Dunlin and Little Stint. Other records included the second site record of Garganey, plus Little Egret, Common Scoter and a good scattering of passerines such as Wheatear and Whinchat.

Overall the breeding season was successful for a wide range of species, most notably the first successful breeding of Gadwall after many years of waiting! Waders enjoyed moderate success with Redshank and Lapwing both rearing young, although Little Ringed Plover failed. Once again the most obvious success was of Common Terns with 15 nests on Tern Island, although not all raised broods as a number of nests were deserted. Other notable breeding was of Mandarin, Barnacle Goose, Tufted Duck (several broods), Kingfisher and Grey Wagtail.

Autumn was generally very quiet with a small wader passage, the appearance of 3 Ruddy Ducks (remaining until November), single Firecrest and Brent Goose, the latter of which was only the second site record, the first being in 1984. The year closed with duck numbers building and December records of Peregrine and Little Egret.


[Previous Year]       [Previous Section]       [Contents List]         [Next Section]         [Next Year]

CHAPTER 4

BOTANICAL SURVEY 2002

Dr Delphine Hoyle

Quantitative surveys of the meadow areas on the North and West sides of Colebrook Lake North have been undertaken since 1997. Prior to that overall records of the plants occurring on the reserve have been kept since 1992.

The method used is based on National Vegetational Classification Methodology and the 2002 survey was carried out on 13 July. Ten random samples (1 x 1 metre) were taken, five on the north side and five on the west side of Colebrook Lake North. In each of the sample squares the species present were identified and quantified on the abundance present –

1. <4 % few individuals 6. 26-33 %
2. <4 % several individuals 7. 34-50 %
3. <4 % many individuals 8. 51-75 %
4. 4-10% 9. 76-90%
5. 11-25% 10. 91-100%

In addition the frequency of occurrence was also recorded -

I 1-20 % (1 in 5 samples)
II 21-40% (2 in 5 samples)
III 41-60%  (3 in 5 samples)
IV 61-80% (4 in 5 samples)
V 81-100% (5 in 5 samples)

 

Table A gives the frequency and abundance of the species found in the samples. Table B lists other species noted in the immediately surrounding areas.

 

Predominant species have remained remarkably constant over the survey period -Table C - and the majority of originally sown species are still present - Table D. Few new species have appeared over the last five years.

 

The site has, however, become much more “patchy”, with big areas of nettle and bramble, mainly around the area surveyed.

 

The help of all those who have taken part in the survey work is gratefully acknowledged.

 

Table A

LATIN NAME COMMON NAME COLEBROOK LAKE NORTH
North West

S

Achillea millefolium

Yarrow

II (9)

0

S

Centaurea nigra

Black knapweed

III (1-9)

V (7-9)

 

Centarium erythraea

Common centaury

I (2)

0

 

Cerastium fontanum

Common mouse-ear

I (5)

0

 

Cirsium arvense

Creeping Thistle

I (2)

I (4)

 

Crategus monogyna

Hawthorn seedling

I (1)

0

 

Crepis spp

Hawkweed

I (1)

0

S

Daucus carota

Wild carrot

III (1)

II (5-7)

S

Galium verum

Lady’s bedstraw

III (2-4)

II (6-7)

 

Geranium dissectum

Cut-leaved cranesbill

I (1)

I (1)

S

Geranium pratense

Meadow Cranesbill

0

I (1)

S

Hypericum perforatum

Perforate St.John’s wort

11 (1)

I (2)

S

Hypochoeris radicata

Common catsear

I (2)

0

 

Lathyrus pratensis

Meadow vetchling

I (5)

I (8)

S

Leucanthemum vulgare

Ox-eye daisy

V (4-9)

IV (1-7)

S

Lotus corniculatus

Bird’s-foot trefoil

II (4-6)

III (2-6)

 

Lychnis flos-cuculi

Ragged Robin

0

I (1)

S

Medicago lupulina

Black medick

II (7-8)

0

S

Plantago lanceolata

Ribwort plantain

V (1-9)

V (1-8)

S

Prunella vulgaris

Selfheal

I (2)

I (1)

 

Quercus robur

Oak seedling

I (1)

0

S

Ranunculus acris

Meadow buttercup

0

I (2)

 

Ranunculus repens

Creeping buttercup

III (1-5)

IV (6-10)

S

Rumex acetosa

Sorrel

I (2)

II (1)

 

Rumex spp

Dock spp.

II (1)

I (2)

 

Seneciojacobaea

Ragwort

III (1-2)

0

 

Stachys officinalis

Betony

0

I (1)

 

Stellaria graminea

Lesser stitchwort

IV (1-4)

III (1-5)

 

Trifolium pratense

Red clover

V (1-9)

II (5-8)

 

Trifolium repens

White clover

II (6-9)

I (4)

S

Vicia sativa

Common vetch

I (3)

0

S

Vicia tetrasperma

Smooth Tare

III (1-4)

IV (1-5)

Agrostis spp.

Bent spp.

V (4-9)

V (4-6)

Holcus lanatus

Yorkshire Fog

III (4-7)

IV (57)

Poa spp

Meadow Grass

0

I (1)

Vulpia bromoides

Squirrel-tail Fescue

II (6-7)

0

Note:  S = Sown species

Table B

Other plants recorded outside the sample squares

 

  LATIN NAME COMMON NAME
 

Agrimonia eupatoria

Agrimony

 

Anagallis arvensis

Scarlet pimpernel

 

Arctium minus agg

Lesser burdock

 

Arrhenatherum elatius

False oat grass

 

Artemisia vulgaris

Mugwort

 

Dactylis glomerata

Cocksfoot

 

Deschampsia cespitosa

Tufted hair-grass

 

Elymus repens

Couch grass

 

Epilobium spp

Willowherb

 

Filago vulgaris

Common cudweed

 

Fraxinus excelsior

Ash seedling

 

Galium aparine

Common Cleavers

 

Heracleum sphondylium

Hogweed

S

Knautia arvensis

Field Scabious

 

Linaria vulgaris

Common toadflax

 

Lolium perenne

Perennial ryegrass

 

Lycopus europaeus

Gipsywort

 

Malva sylvestris

Common mallow

 

Matncaria matncanoides

Pineapple weed

 

Polygonum persicaria

Redshank

 

Pulicaria dysenterica

Common fleabane

 

Rubus fructicosus agg

Bramble

 

Scrophularia auriculata

Water figwort

 

Senecio vulgaris

Groundsel

 

Sonus arvensis

Sowthistle

 

Stachys sylvatica

Hedge woundwort

 

Trifolium arvense

Haresfoot clover

 

Ulex europaeus

Gorse

 

Urtica dioica

Nettle

  S = Sown species

Table C    Predominant species

  1997 1998 2000 2001 2002
  N side W side N side W side N side W side N side W side N side W side
Centaurea nigra V (4-5) V (4-5) V (1-6) IV (1-5 II (1-3) V (1-7) III (4-6) V (5-8)

III(1-9)

V(7-9)

Leucanthemum vulgare V (4-8) V (3-9) V (3-7) IV (2-4) V (2-8) IV (3-5) V (4-7) V (1-4)

V (4-9)

IV( 1-7)

Plantago lanceolata V (4-7) V (6-8) V (5-8) IV (5-9) V (1-9) IV (5-7) V (2-7) V (1-8)

V(1-9)

V(1-8)

Stellaria graminea V (2-5) V (3-5) V (1-5) IV (1-5 V (1-4) III (1) II (3-4) I (3)

IV (1-4)

III (1-5)

Agrostis spp. V (4-9) V(4-10) IV(5-7) I (4) V (8-10) V (3-10) V (5-9) IV (4-9)

V (4-9)

V (4-6)

Holcus lanatus III (1-3) II (1-3) I (4) 0 V (1-7) V (1-9) III (1-5) V (1-5)

III (4-7)

IV (57)

 

Table D   Occurrence of sown species

    1997 1998 2000 2001 2002

Achillea millefolium

Yarrow

ü

ü

ü

ü

ü

Centaurea nigra

Black knapweed

ü

ü

ü

ü

ü

Daucus carota

Wild carrot

ü

ü

ü

ü

ü

Echium vulgare

Viper’s bugloss

ü

x

x

x

x

Galium verum

Lady’s bedstraw

ü

ü

ü

ü

ü

Geranium pratense

Meadow cranesbill

ü

x

ü

ü

ü

Hypericum perforatum

Perforate St John’s wort

ü

ü

ü

ü

ü

Hypochaeris radicata

Common catsear

ü

ü

ü

ü

ü

Knautia arvensis

Field scabious

ü

ü

ü

ü

ü

Leucanthemum vulgare

Oxeye daisy

ü

ü

ü

ü

ü

Lotus corniculatus

Birds eye trefoil

ü

ü

ü

ü

ü

Medicago lupulina

Black medick

ü

ü

ü

ü

ü

Plantago lanceolata

Ribwort plantain

ü

ü

ü

ü

ü

Prunella vulgaris

Self heal

ü

ü

ü

ü

ü

Ranunculus acris

Meadow buttercup

x

x

ü

ü

ü

Rumex acetosa

Common sorrel

ü

ü

ü

ü

ü

Silaum silaus

Pepper saxifrage

x

x

x

x

x

Silene alba

White campion

ü

ü

ü

ü

x

Sanguisorba officinalis

Great burnet

x

x

x

x

x

Stachys officinalis

Betony

ü

ü

ü

ü

ü

Taraxacum officinale agg

Dandelion

x

ü

ü

ü

x

Vicia sativa

Common vetch

x

x

ü

ü

ü

Vicia tetrasperma

Smooth tare

ü

ü

ü

ü

ü


[Previous Year]       [Previous Section]       [Contents List]         [Next Section]         [Next Year]

CHAPTER 5

REPORT ON BUTTERFLIES FOR 2002

 Recorder Sue Proudley

Butterfly records for 2002 started at the end of March with 4 Brimstone, 3 Red Admiral, 4 Peacock, and 4 Comma.

 

April and May looked promising with Brimstone, Small White, Orange Tip, Peacock and Comma numbers reaching double figures. It was good to see a better show of Skippers after the dismal records in 2001.

 

A few Small Copper reappeared in July and September, but no Purple Hairstreaks were recorded.

 

A single Painted Lady was seen in June, July and August and one Clouded Yellow in August.

 

We can usually expect to see plenty of brown butterflies from June onward, but these were disappointing with the exception of the Speckled Wood, which did very well. Low numbers of Small Tortoiseshell, Common Blue, and Holly Blue were recorded, and also a single Small Heath.

 

The last Butterfly recorded was a Red Admiral on 13th November.

 

Thank you to all the people who have taken the trouble to record their observations. Please keep up the good work and remember to print your name at the bottom of the record sheet so that I can give you the credit.

 

 

The list of species observed on the reserve in 2002 is as follows:

 

Small Skipper
Essex Skipper
Large Skipper
Brimstone
Large White
Small White
Green-veined White
Orange Tip
Small Copper
Common Blue
Holly Blue
Red Admiral
Painted Lady
Small Tortoiseshell
Peacock
Comma
Speckled Wood
Gatekeeper
Meadow Brown
Ringlet
Marbled White
Clouded Yellow

Number of species 22

The following observers contributed to the records:

Ken Crick
Chris Rose

Colin Proudley
S Farmer

P Taylor

K B Briggs

JAB

IHB

RW

RJG

NRG

GH

JEW

R & JW

AB

AT

JAB

 

Sue Proudley may be contacted on tel: 01252 875536 or

By e-mail: c.proudley(at)btopenworld.com

  MOOR GREEN BUTTERFLIES  

 

Recorded numbers April - November 2002 

MAR

APR

MAY

JUN

JUL

AUG

SEPT

OCT

NOV

Small Skipper

(Thymelicus sylvestris)

      1 16        

Essex Skipper

(Thymelicus lineola)

        8        

Large Skipper

(Ochiodes venata)

      20 28 2      

Clouded Yellow

(Colias crocea)

          1      

Brimstone

(Gonepteryx rhamni)

4 10 9 7 2        

Large White

(Pieris brassicae)

  6 9 18 23 5 1    

Small White

(Pieris rapae)

  19 6 11 6 2 2    

Green-veined White

(Pieris napi)

  6 6 2 5 3 2    

Orange tip

(Anthocharis cardamines)

  14 20 2          

Green Hairstreak

(Callophrys rubi)

                 

Purple Hairstreak

(Quercusia guercus)

                 

Small Copper

(Lycaena phlaeas)

        4   2    

Common Blue

(Polyommatus Icarus)

      6     2    

Holly Blue

(Celastrina argiolus)

  7 1 3 2 1      

Red Admiral

(Vanessa atalanta)

3 3 1 6 5 2 2 1 1

Painted Lady

(Cynthia cardui)

      1 1 1      

Small Tortoiseshell

(Aglais urticae)

  4 2 1 2 1 2    

Peacock

(lnachis io)

4 18 3 2 1 3 1    

Comma

(Polygonia c-album)

4 11 1 1 6   2    

Speckled Wood

(Pararge aegeria)

  8 6 6 27 30 30 2  

Grayling

(Hipparchia semele)

                 

Gatekeeper

(Pyonia tithonus)

        80 10 1    

Meadow Brown

(Maniola jurtina)

      10 85 20 2    

Small Heath

(Coenonympha pamphilus)

        1        

Ringlet

(Aphantopus hyperantus)

 

 

 

32 45

 

 

 


[Previous Year]       [Previous Section]       [Contents List]         [Next Section]         [Next Year]

 CHAPTER 6

REPORT ON DRAGONFLIES AND DAMSELFLIES FOR 2002

Ken Crick

The early spring was relatively calm and warm with Large Red Damselflies showing a couple of miles further down the valley by the 16th April. However, towards the end of April and into May the weather was unsettled with low light levels, strong winds and low cloud cover.

 

Emergence of many of our early species was patchy and numbers on the wing were well down on previous years. This variable weather continued throughout much of the summer. Data from three separate weeks were lost due to unfavourable weather conditions. Many of my data sheets for 2002 have statements like "Cloud cover 80% stiff wind from the SE" and "Full sun to start increasing cloud cover 40 to 100%."

 

Our Management Plan designates Common Darter, Common Blue Damselfly and Blue-tailed Damselfly as species indicative of continuing good management of the reserve’s scrapes and shallows. All three species showed a marked decline in populations on the wing, with Common Darter registering 1/5th of normal annual population level and Common Blue Damselfly being between 1/2 and 1/3 of the annual average. Blue - tailed Damselfly faired no better, with annual average population level down by 1/2 based on the last five years. The data from the five transects indicate that the population decline exists across the site as a whole.

 

River species did well. Banded Demoiselle figures remained high. Large red Damselfly (that in the main seems to locate itself on Colebrook Cut), numbers held up well.

 

It was a bad year for Four-spotted Chaser. The Black- tailed Skimmer, with an annual population average of 58, this year only registered 16 specimens. However, this species tends to drift away from mature sites and Moor Green is now ten years old and maturing.

 

Brown and Migrant Hawker numbers remained respectable. Downy Emerald was seen again. In all 18 species put in an appearance, but 2002 was not a good year. Population fluctuations are expected year-on-year and indeed the records reflect this.

 

I offer the following factors as possibly contributing to this years collapsing populations of the site’s key monitoring species:-

 

a) Weather conditions throughout the flight season were generally unfavourable.

 

b) The five transects routinely monitored are becoming overgrown and shaded.

 

c) Crassula helmsii infests the shallows of Colebrook Lake North & South.

 

d) As the site matures some species that prefer newly created sites will decrease.

 

e) The draw-down zone was less apparent with water levels higher than previous years until late into the summer. Larger fish could hunt right up to the shoreline.

 

f) Fish populations may be on the increase, with evidence of large numbers of small pike caught during last year’s attempted Crassula helmsii removal.

 

My thanks are extended to those providing information - they were:-

 

Dr Ian Brown

Mrs. Sue Proudley

Mrs. Chris Rose

Mr. Jonathan Mist

Mr. Cohn Proudley

Mr. Alex Twyford

Mr. John Warren

and GH    RJE

ODONATA CHECKLIST

DAMSELFLIES Zygoptera

 

BLUE-TAILED DAMSELFLY Ischnura elegans

This was not a good year for this species. Compared with the numbers recorded over the previous five years the overall numbers seen on the wing were down by over a third. The first recorded sightings were of ten males on the 15th May. There were good numbers present through-out June, peaking at 66 individuals on the 11th. Copulating pairs were observed only twice. A final appearance was registered with a single male on the 27th August.

 

BANDED DEMOISELLE Caloperyx splendens

This species' iridescent green female continues to cause identification problems, with some observers claiming good numbers of emerald damselfly on the river. Banded Demoiselle had a good year. They were first seen by Cohn Proudley on the 23rd April. There were two population peaks within the flight season, the first on the 26th May registering 260 individuals and the second on the 27th August with 103 individuals. The last recorded presence for the season was on the 17th September. The first population peak was between two to three weeks earlier than would have been predicted based on the previous five years’ data.

 

LARGE RED DAMSELFLY Pyrrhosorna nymphala

This species had an average year in population terms. It was first reported on the 23rd April, again by Cohn Proudley. Its main haunt is Colebrook Cut in the vicinity of the sluice. The population peaked with a count of 28 on the 21st May and it was last seen on site on the 26th June.

 

EMERALD DAMSELFLY Lestes sponsa

Recorded numbers for this species are always low. Our best year was in 1999. This year ran it a close second. A total of eight were seen between the 26th July and the 27th August.

 

COMMON BLUE DAMSELFLY Enallagama cyathigerum

The year started with numbers on the wing comparable with those of 1998 & 2001, remaining this way throughout June. July heralded a population collapse from which only a minor recovery was achieved, with numbers typically 1/2 to 1/3 of the previous worst year. Their presence was first noted on the 15th May. Ninety percent of the 41 seen were in the sexually immature form. The population peak of 576 was recorded on the 26th June, with a second small peak of 160 on the 2nd August. The last sighting was outside the survey discipline and was recorded on the 23rd September, when 2 males were seen.

 

AZURE DAMSELFLY Coenagrion puellao

Last year (2001) produced the highest population counts to date and even then the maximum numbers seen on a given day only reached 6 individuals. This year the survey only recorded five individuals in total, one on the 26th May, and two on each of the 19th June and 26th June, all males. John Warren recorded two Azures on site on the 27th July.

 

RED-EYED DAMSELFLY Eiythromma najas

A single male was first seen on the 15th May. Ones, twos and threes were seen throughout June. None were seen in July. Four were recorded on the 16th August, with a final sighting on the 27th August.

 

DRAGONFLIES Anisoptera

 

FOUR-SPOTTED CHASER Libellula quadrimaculata

The weekly survey picked up only three Four- spotted Chasers, one on the 21st May and two in June. The member of this species seen by GH on the 19th July was the last recorded sighting for the season. On our reserve 2002 was a very poor year for this species, the second worst since 1997.

 

DOWNY EMERALD Cordulia aenea

This is the third consecutive year this species has recorded a full life cycle on the reserve. Males were seen over-flying Colebrook Lake North throughout June and on the 2nd June an exuvia was found in almost the same location, as in the previous two years. On the 1st June, Alex Twyford recorded 3 Downy Emeralds on site.

 

BLACK-TAILED SKIMMER Orthetrum cancellatum

2001 was our best year ever for this species, with 68 individuals recorded. The site average over the previous four years is 55. For 2002 the total count for the flight season was only 16, of which eight were seen on the 11th June, all immature forms. Three exuvia were found on the 19th June, all in the north west corner of Colebrook Lake North. The last sighting of this species was recorded by Steve Farmer on the 19th August.

 

This species is known to favour new sites and therefore is likely to desert mature ones. The age of our reserve is now reaching double figures and this may account for the very poor showing this year.

 

EMPEROR DRAGONFLY Anax Imperator

Numbers for this species remain low. A female was seen on the 2nd June and a male on the 26th. The last observation was of an ovipositing female on the 26th July.

 

BROWN HAWKER Aeshna grandis

2001 was a poor year for this species at Moor Green. 2002 showed an increase in the total numbers on the wing, exceeding those recorded for both 2001 & 2000. The first sighting was on the 13th of July when 9 were recorded over four of the five prescribed transects. An ovipositing female was observed over the Grove Lake scrape on the 27th July during a site visit not associated with the Dragonfly survey work. The final recorded sighting was of three males on the 8th September.

 

GOLDEN-RINGED DRAGONFLY Cordulegaster boltonii

After last year when this species was not observed over the reserve, a single male was seen twice, once on the 13th July and the second time three days later.
 

BROAD-BODIED CHASER Libellula depressa

A rarely-seen visitor to our site. A single female was observed to the south of Colebrook Lake South, near to the footbridge on the Blackwater, on the 1st June. This species is known to breed locally on Yateley Common.

 

MIGRANT HAWKER Aeshna mixta

Not quite the lowest yearly population count to date. Numbers are down for 2002 by about one-third based on the previous two years data. This species was on site from the start of August to the end of September and survey counts on a single day of between 5 and 9 individuals were not uncommon. A copulating pair was only seen on one occasion.

 

SOUTHERN HAWKER Aeshna cyanea

First recorded on the reserve on the 2nd August, they were again observed on three occasions during September. Coincidentally, each survey resulting in an observation of this species recorded the sighting of two individuals. Bucking the trend, this year produced the second highest population count for this species to date.

 

COMMON HAWKER Aeshna juncea

This not-so-common insect was not seen at all during the course of any population survey visit.

 

RUDDY DARTER Sympetrum sanguineum

The six Ruddy-Darter sightings were spread over the period between 26th July and 23rd September. They were all males. 2000 & 2001 saw relatively high numbers of this species, but 2002’s data more closely resembles the levels of the late 1990’s.

 

COMMON DARTER Sympetrum striolatum

The first two teneral-form Common Darters were observed on the 26th June. They were present throughout July, August & September, with a final recorded sighting on the 28th October, when two mating pairs were seen ovipositing in Colebrook Lake North hide scrape. Ovipositing was witnessed on three further separate occasions in September. Again this is the poorest year on the reserve for six years, with numbers on the wing being 1/5 of the annual average over the last five years. The average number seen on the wing for the last 5 years was 300 individuals, with only 66 individuals being observed this year.


[Previous Year]       [Previous Section]       [Contents List]         [Next Section]         [Next Year]

CHAPTER 7

SURVEY OF SOLITARY WASPS AND BEES DURING 2002

Martin Mitchell and Steve Farmer.

During the early summer of 2002 surveys were conducted at Moor Green Lakes on the number of species of solitary wasps and bees observed at three sites. Several years ago three small steep sandy banks had been excavated on the north side of the Colebrook North Lake. These are just below the wooden fence behind Moor Green Farm close to the shore of the lake. For convenience these are called the West, Middle and East Banks. In the intervening years these had become rather overgrown and eroded by grazing cattle. On the Work Party in February 2002 the vertical faces of the West and Middle Banks were re-dressed, but the East Bank was not disturbed. Stout wooden posts were driven in at the corners of each bank to mark the extent of the survey areas. The West Bank is 4.0 metres long by 1.2 metres wide, the Middle Bank is 8.0m by 1.3m, and the East Bank is 4.7m by 1.2m. The West and Middle Banks each include vertical faces about 0.3m high. However the East Bank has a small sloping area of small flints, another small sloping area of hard packed sandy soil and several shallow vertical faces below tussocks of grass. All three Banks face south-south-west and are very well exposed to midday sunshine. The Banks are well drained and the, vegetation in the immediate vicinity is short grass and mixed wildflowers.

During June and July surveys were conducted on 5 days. These had two simple objectives. The first was to count the number of distinct species of solitary wasp and bee observed (without attempting a full identification). Some of these may have been parasitic wasps. Each survey lasted between 30 and 60 minutes. The results of the surveys are given in the table below. On any particular observing day some of the commoner species could readily be recognised as being present on more than one of the banks and these are included only once in the overall total.

 

Date Weather Number of distinct species of solitary wasps and bees

West

Middle East

Total

2 June

mostly cloudy, sunny intervals.

 

 

 

2

18 July

mostly cloudy, 17C, very light winds.

2

3

4

6

19 July

bright sunshine, cloudless, 20C, light SE wind

4

2

6

8

26 July

bright sunshine, almost cloudless, 23C,lightWwind

5

5

6

8

28 July

fine, sunny, hot.

 

 

 

6

 

The second objective was to count the number of holes which showed recent signs of activity, indicated by small piles of fine sandy soil below the entrances. Most of these holes were in the open bare sections of the banks.

 

Date Number of holes showing recent signs of activity
West Middle East Total
19 July 12

10

20 42
26 July 15 15 30 60

 

A survey of the wildflowers in the area surrounding the Banks on 18th July showed that there were at least 20 different species in bloom. It was clear that some of the wasps and bees were foraging on these flowers in the immediate vicinity.

 

In the MGLNR Management Plan, Issue 1, February 2002 in Section 5.7.2 the criterion for favourable conditions prevailing on these vertical exposures of bare ground has been specified. It is deemed to exist if more than two species of mining bee or wasp (from a specified list of species) are observed to be present. During these surveys, while it was not possible to identify the different species observed, it seems clear that the banks are successful. It is also interesting to note that the East Bank seems to be the most successful with more species present and more holes occupied. At this Bank the wasp and bee activity was clearly observed to extend beyond the survey area into the surrounding grassland. This Bank was not re-dressed during the winter and it may be that the West and Middle Banks should now be left undisturbed to encourage more species to return.


[Previous Year]       [Previous Section]       [Contents List]         [Next Section]         [Next Year]

CHAPTER 8

MAMMAL REPORT FOR 2002

 Katrina Slocombe

Roe deer continue to be the most obvious mammal on the Reserve and nearby fields. Stoats are occasionally seen on the surrounding footpaths, but the Water Vole, our most endangered mammal, has again been absent from Reserve and river. This is not unexpected, due to the continued presence of Mink on Long Island. The anti-mink fence around Tern Island may deter the Mink and encourage them to go elsewhere for more ‘easy meals’!

Although no small mammal surveys were possible during the period, it is hoped that populations are being maintained. Certainly hunting by owls on the site throughout the year would suggest that they are continuing to source the reserve grasslands for their mammal prey. The presence of harvest mice is evident from several breeding nests of woven grasses discovered on work party days.

 

Steve Bailey is continuing a series of Bat Surveys throughout the Blackwater Valley and Moor Green Lakes’ results can be found in the following Chapter.

 

Surveys and observations will continue in the coming year and members are encouraged to send all sightings of wild and feral mammals to Katrina Slocombe, 28 Green Lane, Blackwater, Camberley, Surrey, GU17 9DH, or pass them to any member of the committee.


[Previous Year]       [Previous Section]       [Contents List]         [Next Section]         [Next Year]

CHAPTER 9

BATS OF MOOR GREEN LAKES

Steve Bailey

 

Previous Moor Green Lakes Nature Reserve Annual Reports list 5 species of bat recorded on the Reserve. These records mainly stem from a few ad hoc reports and a couple of bat walks on the site organised in the early 1990’s. A detailed report was commissioned as part of the rolling programme of surveys for the site, the intention being:

  • to assess Moor Green Lakes Nature Reserve for bat use and bat habitats;

  • to describe a repeatable monitoring programme and baseline results;

  • to provide recommendations to be incorporated into the management plan that will maintain and improve the value of the site for bats.

Two transects have been set up to collect quantifiable bat data. One of these transects was the length of the River Blackwater on the edge of the Reserve surveyed for Daubenton’s bats as part of a national survey. A second transect on Colebrook Lake was established in 2000 and repeated in 2001 to assess use over the lakes. The forty-three bat boxes erected on site are also monitored annually.

 

In addition to this, 5 evening visits were carried out in 2002 to look at bat activity around Grove Lake. These surveys and the Colebrook Lake transect used an ultrasonic bat detector with time expansion capability. Bat calls were recorded and later analysed with computer software that gives the best method of identifying bat species without actually catching the bats.

 

The site was found to have a high value for bats. This high value is due to both foraging on site and also the strategically important flyways, linking the lakes and river on the valley floor to the wooded Finchampstead Ridges.

 

Bats foraged all around the Reserve, especially the tree-lined river and lake shores. The low fish stocks in the lakes contrast with the habitat of the stocked angling lakes typical of the Blackwater Valley and so provide important variety, adding to the overall value of the Valley. On some nights hundreds of pipistrelles could be seen feeding over the lakes.

 

The hedgerows linking the Reserve to the wooded areas to the north are important and are used by large numbers of bats of a number of species. Bats are also commuting onto the Reserve along the River and from the south via the tree lined lakes and hedgerows / wooded areas.

 

No natural roost sites were located on the Reserve, where there are relatively few dead or large mature trees. Probably bats using the Reserve are roosting in nearby houses or trees in the wooded area of Finchampstead Ridges. However, 1 male and 2 female

 

55 kHz pipistrelles were found in a box sited in the western hedge in September 2002, the first evidence that the boxes are being used.

 

Four species of bats were observed foraging over the Reserve most evenings and 2 further species were confirmed on site.

 

The 55 kHz pipistrelle (Pipistrellus pygmaeus) was the most numerous bat recorded on the Colebrook Lake transect in both years (50% of all bats recorded in 2000 and 39% in 2001). The 45 kHz pipistrelle (Pipistrellus pipistrellus) ranked second with 28% in 2000 and 33% in 2001.

 

This difference may reflect where the transect was located. The 2001 survey indicated that the 55 kHz pipistrelle favoured the tree lined edges of Colebrook South / river corridor, but did move out over the open Colebrook Lake North in June & July to feed on swarms of Caenis Mayfly. The 2002 surveys also found the 45 kHz pipistrelles were more numerous around the lake edges and scrub areas, whereas the 55 kHz pipistrelles were more numerous commuting down the hedgerows and foraging along the river.

 

Daubenton’s (Myotis daubentonii) bat was the third species of bat that was observed foraging on the Reserve most nights. This species is closely associated with water and is known for its habit of foraging just above the surface of ponds and rivers, which makes it easily visible. Numbers were much lower than the pipistrelles, but, like the pipistrelles, numbers varied from evening to evening, as did the centre of activity. On some evenings the river was well used, on other nights activity was mostly over the lakes. It is likely that during favourable evenings 20-50 Daubenton’s were foraging over the Reserve.

 

The fourth species that was regular encountered was the Noctule (Nyctalus noctula). Activity was low in the early part of each year, but increased in late May and June. Numbers were lower at Moor Green than the other gravel pits studied in the Valley to the south and they arrived later at Moor Green, suggesting that the Reserve may be at the northern edge of a colony’s territory.

 

On some nights foraging activity is minimal, with bats visiting the Reserve but not stopping. On other nights, especially in mid summer, 1-5 Noctules forage over the Reserve and adjacent lakes. Although a comparatively small number, the Reserve is playing an important role in supporting a colony of this declining species.

 

Brown Long-eared bats (Plecotus auritus) are included on the species list published in the Annual Reports. This is believed to originate from a single record of unknown accuracy from a bat walk prior to 1990. They use very quiet calls and so are rarely recorded by echolocation surveys.

 

Three time-expansion recordings on 27th June 2002 in the car park were confirmed as this species. The bats are almost certainly more common on the site than this one evening’s recordings suggest. It is probable that a colony (usually 10-30 bats) based in the Finchampstead Ridges woodland is using the Reserve as part of its foraging territory.
 

Mixed in with the Long-eared bats were at least two bats that were almost certainly Natterer’s (Myotis nattereri). This survey was just 3 days after recording Natterer’s bat in the Finchampstead Ridges woodland, indicating that a local maternity colony is using the Reserve as part of its territory.

 

The Natterer’s bat has its international stronghold in southern Britain. Foraging areas include woodlands, wet woodlands and watersides with high tree cover. One of Europe’s major hibernation and swarming sites for this species occurs at Greywell Tunnel. This is well within an evening’s flight range of the Natterer’s bats at Moor Green.

 

The pipistrelle is a national BAP priority species. Other bat species have probably declined to an equal extent and are equally deserving of conservation measures: Noctules and Natterer’s fall into this category. (Noctules are included in the Bracknell Forest local BAP whilst Wokingham’s BAP includes all bat species).

 

Because of the site’s high value for bats, there is a need to balance the requirements of the Reserve’s bat population with its other specialities. In general bats benefit from trees and water, as. these provide rich sources of insects and, in the case of woodland, also provide cover and roost sites. Management that aims to increase tree cover and maintain the hedgerows and tree belts that act as flyways is a priority. Cattle grazing should continue as the preferred way of maintaining the areas of rough scrubby grassland, as permanent pasture and dung are a rich source of insects. The increasing diversity of the aquatic and marginal flora will be beneficial to bats, as this also leads to a diverse insect fauna.

 

For people interested in birds the Reserve may appear quiet and lifeless at night, but it is only a change of shift. With the maturing of the site and minor change to management practices the value of the Reserve for bats should continue to slowly increase. It will be interesting to see the results of any repeated monitoring surveys in 5 years’ time.


[Previous Year]       [Previous Section]       [Contents List]         [Next Section]         [Next Year]

CHAPTER 10

HEDGEROW SURVEY 29TH MAY 2002

Irene Draper and Ken Crick

This survey constituted one of those planned for 2002 (Management Plan Objective 5.5d). The survey was executed on a date that was almost too late in the season as ground-cover plants are not so easily found beneath the early summer flush of grasses and nettles. Many hedgerow surveys are seeking ancient woodland indicator plants in the ground flora. Our hedge was known to have been planted approximately 10 years ago, so the presence or otherwise of ancient woodland indicator plants was not considered to be significant.

 

The survey was conducted in line with the method taught on the B.B. & 0. Wildlife Trust course. Mrs. Irene Draper, a Group member with knowledge of plants acquired over many years, provided the botanical input. Ken Crick attended the hedgerow-surveying course and assisted with method and data recording.

 

The survey was carried out on the hedge that runs from the car park at Lower Sandhurst Road (Map ref. SU 805,626) to the River Blackwater. The hedge forms the western-most boundary along which conservation activities take place. The whole length of the hedge was surveyed using a 30-metre line to define each of the 20 survey bays. The height and width of the hedge was assessed using a one metre measuring stick. The record sheets reproduced here were adapted from those used on the course and developed by Dick Greenaway for the Ashampstead Parish, Berkshire, Hedgerow Survey.

 

The majority of the hedge is overgrown; it contains seven species of standard single trunk trees. The hedge itself is made up of 10 species of shrub. There are a number of large gaps in the hedge. Just how intentional these were in the original planting is not known. Forty-one species of ground flora were recorded as present.

 

The hedgerow supplement of the first Management Plan, produced at the time the Reserve was created, listed six species of cuttings and transplants to be used. They were oak, ash, silver birch, hawthorn, alder and blackthorn. Five of these are present in the current hedge. The absence of alder may indicate that it was not planted in the hedge, as it does grow elsewhere on site.

 

Three bays (16,17 & 18) have been laid. The ground adjacent to bays 19 & 20 is particularly shaded and remains damp for long periods. It is suggested that these two bays be scheduled next for laying.

 

MOOR GREEN LAKES HEDGEROW SURVEY

Date 27 MAY 2002 - START POINT SU8055..E 6260..N

 

BAY(30m)

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

Average height (m)

0

0

0

5

2.5

3.5

4 PLUS

4 PLUS

3.5

3.5

Average width (m)

0

0

0

2.5

2.5

2.75

2.5

2.5

2.5

2.5

Condition

0

0

0

Og

Og

Og

Og

Og

Og

Og

Gaps (% of Bay)

99%

99%

100%

30%

0

0

0

0

0

10%

Rabbit holes

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

Og - Overgrown

 

Standard Trees            St = Stool    M = Multi-stem     S = Single

Elm

S

S

S

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Oak

 

 

 

S

 

 

S

S

 

 

Wild Pear

 

 

 

S

 

 

 

 

 

 

Ash

 

 

 

S

 

 

S

 

 

 

Silver Birch

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

S

Field Maple

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Hornbeam

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Hedgerow Shrubs

Bramble   X X     X X X    
Hawthorne       X X X X X X X
Blackthorn       X X X X X X X

Field Maple

 

 

 

 

X

 

 

 

 

 

Damson

 

 

 

 

 

X

 

 

 

 

Oak

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Wild Pear                    
Elder                    
Birch           X        

 

Date 27 MAY 2002 - START POINT SU8055..E 6260..N

 

BAY(30m)

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

Average height (m)

3

2

4

4

3

3

2

1.5

4 PLUS

4 PLUS

Average width (m)

2

2

0

1.5

1.5

1.5

1.5

1

1.5

1.5

Condition

Og

Og

R

Og

Og

L

L

L

Og

Og

Gaps (% of Bay)

3%

5%

99%

3%

25%

2%

2%

0

0

0

Rabbit holes

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

0

Og - Overgrown

 

Standard Trees            St = Stool    M = Multi-stem     S = Single

Elm

   

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Oak

   

 

 

 

 

S

 

 

 

Wild Pear

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Ash

 

 

 

 

 

s

S

 

s

 

Silver Birch

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Field Maple

 

 

 

s

 

 

 

 

 

 

Hornbeam

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

S

 

Hedgerow Shrubs

Bramble x X                
Hawthorne x x x X X X X X X X
Blackthorn x x   X X X X X X X

Field Maple

x

x

 

 

X

x

 

 

 

x

Damson

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Oak

x

x

 

 

 

 

x

 

 

 

Wild Pear       x x         x
Elder                 x  
Birch                    

 

Date 27 MAY 2002 - START POINT SU8055..E 6260..N

 

Ground Flora

BAY(30m)

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

Grasses

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

Nettle

X

X

X

X

 

 

X

X

X

X

Goose Grass

X

 

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

Lesser Stitchwort

X

 

 

 

X

 

 

 

 

X

Willowherb Small

 

 

 

 

X

 

 

 

 

X

Creeping Thistle

 

 

 

 

X

 

 

 

 

 

Scentless Mayweed

 

 

 

 

X

 

 

 

X

 

Cut-leaved Cranesbill

X

X

X

 

 

 

X

X

 

X

Yarrow

X

 

X

X

 

 

 

 

 

 

Common Chickweed

X

 

 

 

 

 

 

X

X

X

Upright Hedge Parsley

X

X

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

X

Rib-leaved Plantain

 

X

X

X

 

 

 

 

 

 

Dock

 

X

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Dandelion

 

X

X

X

 

X

X

X

 

 

Mash Thistle

 

X

 

X

 

 

 

 

 

X

Mugwort

 

X

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Woody Nightshade

 

X

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Mallow

 

X

X

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Greater Stitchwort

 

 

 

 

X

X

 

X

 

X

Round-leaved Plantain

 

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

Common Vetch

 

 

 

X

 

 

 

 

 

 

Hogweed

 

 

X

X

 

 

 

 

 

X

Thyme-leaved Speedwell

 

 

 

X

 

 

 

 

 

 

Rough Hawksbeard

 

 

 

X

 

 

 

 

 

 

Garlic Mustard

 

 

 

 

 

X

X

X

 

 

Cow Parsley

 

 

 

 

 

X

 

X

X

 

Hemlock

 

 

 

 

 

X

 

 

 

 

Spear Thistle

 

 

 

 

 

X

 

 

 

 

White Bryony

 

 

 

 

 

X

X

 

X

 

Herb Bennet

 

 

 

 

 

 

X

 

 

 

Hop

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

X

 

 

Date 27 MAY 2002 - START POINT SU8055..E 6260..N

 

Ground Flora

BAY(30m)

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

Grasses

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

Nettle

 

 

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

Goose Grass

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

Lesser Stitchwort

 

 

 

X

 

 

 

 

 

 

Cut-leaved Cranesbill

X

X

X

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Rib-leaved Plantain

 

X

 

 

 

 

X

 

 

 

Broad-leaved Dock

 

 

X

X

X

X

 

 

X

 

Dandelion

X

X

 

 

 

X

X

 

 

 

Mash Thistle

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Mugwort

 

X

X

 

X

X

 

X

X

X

Woody Nightshade

 

 

 

 

 

 

X

 

 

 

Greater Stitchwort

X

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Round-leaved Plantain

X

X

X

X

 

X

X

 

 

 

Common Vetch

 

 

 

 

 

 

X

 

X

 

Hogweed

 

 

 

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

Thyme-leaved Speedwell

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Rough Hawksbeard

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Cow Parsley

 

 

X

X

 

X

X

X

X

 

Hemlock

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Spear Thistle

 

 

 

 

 

 

X

 

X

 

Meadow Cranesbill

X

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Ivy

 

X

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

White Deadnettle

 

X

 

 

 

 

 

X

 

 

Creeping Buttercup

 

 

X

X

X

X

X

X

 

X

Narrow Leaved Doc

 

 

X

 

 

 

 

 

X

 

Creeping Thistle

 

 

X

 

 

 

 

 

X

 

Nipplewort

 

 

 

 

X

 

 

 

X

X

Upright Hedge Parsley

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

X


[Previous Year]       [Previous Section]       [Contents List]         [Next Section]         [Next Year]

 

CHAPTER 11

REPTILE REPORT FOR 2002

 Peter Scott

Reptile recording on site has two components:

  • regular inspections of corrugated iron sheets (and their surroundings) in two areas:

    a) five sheets within 50 metres of the hibernaculum near Colebrook Lake North;

    b) five sheets spread along a 200-metre section of the north shore of Grove Lake;

  • casual reports of sightings anywhere on the reserve.

Regular inspections

Eleven sheet-inspection visits were made between mid-May and mid-October. On three of these visits only half the tins (those near the hibernaculum) were inspected. Spring visits found no reptiles, but from July onwards most visits were rewarded with at least one sighting. All the animals seen were grass snakes (Natrix natrix) or their moulted skins. The overall results are summarised in the following table:

 

Summary of surveys of reptile basking tins: 2002

 

Site visits made 

Total tin-inspections

Total grass snakes (or skins) seen

Sightings per tin-inspection

11

93

6

0.06

                                       

All the snakes seen were under or close to the tins near the hibernaculum. None were found at the tins along the shore of Grove Lake. However, the small amount of data means that this does not necessarily reflect a real variation in snake distribution.

 

Casual reports

Seven reptile sightings were reported. Six of these were of grass snakes (or their skins), two around Grove Lake and four around Colebrook. The seventh report was of three Adders (Vipera berus) in a pile of Crassula that had been removed from the scrape by Colebrook hide.

 

Reptiles released on site

A local herpetologist, Gareth Matthes, released seven grass snakes (rescued from a development site in Mytchett) near the hibernaculum during August and September. For this reason alone, a subsequent increase in sightings might be expected.

 

Summary

Clearly the data collected cannot give a reliable picture of reptile populations on site. Rather, they are intended to form a basis from which some indication of trends might be derived. The results are probably as interesting for what is missing as much as for what was found. In particular, there were no sightings of either slow worms or common lizards, though it seems unlikely that both are completely absent.


[Previous Year]       [Previous Section]       [Contents List]         [Next Section]         [Next Year]

CHAPTER 12

REPORT ON REED BED PROJECT FOR 2002

 Steve Farmer

 

The extraction of gravel from the Manor Farm site, immediately to the west of the Moor Green Lakes Nature Reserve, has continued throughout the year. Gravel extraction and site restoration will take about ten years. In August 2002 RMC Aggregates (Southern) Ltd released revised plans for the proposed restoration of the site. It is envisaged that part of the site will be restored as a nature reserve and part as amenity land.

 

Under these proposals it is expected that:

  • the Colebrook Cut will be restored but in a slightly different position;

  • extra trees will be planted along the north side of the site to supplement existing plantings;

  • there will be three managed reed beds;

  • a small lake with reedy margins will feed water into the upper reed bed;

  • water will be drawn from Colebrook Cut to feed the other two large reed beds;

  • there will be a large lake with reedy margins on the south side of the site;

  • three viewing mounds will be provided at strategic points to allow bird watchers to observe the reed beds and the main lake;

  • the western end of the site will be restored mainly as grassland with a small pond.

A small pilot project was set up in 2001 to investigate methods of reed propagation for the reed beds. During 2002 the germination trials of the common reed (Phragmites australis), which were started in December 2001, were completed. The final test using reed seed collected late in the winter from two local sources (Colebrook Cut and one of the Watersports Lakes) produced very poor germination rates. This confirmed earlier findings that the best results are obtained with seed obtained from large reed beds. Unfortunately the setting up of the pilot reed bed has been delayed. It may be made available when the restoration of part of the Manor Farm site starts. In the interim small numbers of reed seedlings (grown from seed collected at Fleet Pond and Lakeside Park) were planted on a small island in the Grove scrape. This was adequate for the initial trials. Unfortunately these seedlings were immediately grazed by Canada Geese. This was a very salutary lesson, but clearly demonstrates the need for adequate protection of newly planted reed seedlings. Some protection was then provided by surrounding the seedlings with bushy sticks, but this was a classic case of shutting the stable door after the horse had bolted. By the early autumn the remaining seedlings had recovered well. It is expected that these seedlings will take about three years to become fully established.

 

In May a small propagation trial using stem cuttings proved to be a failure. Only 2 out of 12 cuttings started to grow and then collapsed. This method has been reported from other sites as being capable of producing a success rate of up to 40% for cuttings taken early in the growing season.

 

In June another test of propagation by division of rhizomes proved to be much more successful with a high rate of success. This method could be used for raising small numbers of plants, but

it is too labour intensive to produce the large number of plants required for a whole reed bed. A small number of plants were planted out at the north east corner of Grove Lake.

 

It has not been possible to test propagation by broadcasting seed in the open as no suitable site has been available for this trial.


[Previous Year]       [Previous Section]       [Contents List]         [Next Section]         [Next Year]

CHAPTER 13

HABITAT SURVEY 2002

 Steve Farmer

The need for a Habitat Survey of the Moor Green Lakes Nature Reserve became apparent at about the time that the Management Plan was being drafted during winter 2000/2001. At that time the only map available of the distribution of vegetation on the Reserve was the original Planting Plan (dated 1989). It was therefore considered necessary that a survey should be undertaken and that maps should be produced.

 

The initial survey work was done during the winter 2000/2001. This survey provided the approximate extent and relative positions of the major habitat types which existed on the Reserve at that time. No great claims are made for the absolute accuracy of this survey as it was heavily dependent on visual estimates of distances and position. However it is thought that the positions of most of the major features are accurate to about ± 10 metres. The relative positions of adjacent features are accurate to about 5 metres.

 

Four maps were produced at the conclusion of the initial survey. These were maps of the whole Reserve (at a scale of approximately 1:5000) and three separate maps for each individual lake (at a scale of approximately 1:2500). These were included in the Management Plan, Issue 1, February 2002. Each 100 x 100 metre square was given a unique “compartment number” and this has been used as a quick and easy reference number for locating features mentioned in the Management Plan. These original maps were produced with the Windows Paint software package. This is not a dedicated mapping package and there were severe restrictions on the production, correction, modification and labelling of the resultant maps.

 

It was recognised that the original maps had several shortcomings. During winter 2001/2002 the Reserve was resurveyed. Some features which had been omitted originally were now included, such as the copses of trees on the north side of Colebrook North and Grove Lakes and some of the bird scrapes on Long Island. The extent of the wildflower meadow and the area covered by rough grass and rushes were reassessed. Internal fences and the main patches of bramble, gorse and bracken were added. The new viewing slots cut during the winter 2001/2002 were included. The positions of the few mature trees which actually grow on the Reserve, and, more importantly, the many mature trees which grow along the north and west boundaries or just outside the Reserve were added. These form an important backdrop for the Reserve. Many are used for siting bird boxes and bat boxes. New features such as the reptile hibernaculum and the anti-mink fence on Tern Island were included. The maps were then plotted using a dedicated software-mapping program called Mapmaker Pro 2.4. This provided much greater freedom in the production and labelling of the resultant maps.

 

Since then the maps have been revised to include recent changes on the Reserve. During the autumn 2002 an area of birch saplings at the east end of Colebrook South was cut down and 10 new viewing slots were cut. The present maps reflect the state of the Reserve in December 2002. These habitat maps will be included in the first annual review of the Management Plan, due to be started in April 2003. [The Overview habitat map is included in Appendix J]


[Previous Year]       [Previous Section]       [Contents List]         [Next Section]         [Next Year]

CHAPTER 14

NEST BOXES 2002

 Dr Kevin Briggs

 

The breeding season was early for most species after a period of good weather in February and March. Occupancy was high at 94% with only three boxes not occupied. Tawny and Little Owl did not use the boxes, but did breed on the Reserve in natural sites. Blue Tit, Great Tit, Mandarin and Stock Dove all increased their occupancy of boxes.

 

1) Great Tit

Seventeen pairs laid eggs in the boxes, but two pairs deserted after laying 4 and 2 eggs respectively because of Great Spotted Woodpecker damage. The first eggs of 4 clutches were laid on 2 April. The mean day was 6 April (sd 3.3 days) The mean clutch size was 7.8 (sd 1.7) eggs and mean brood at hatching was 6.9 (sd 2.0) young (104 young from 118 eggs). Unfortunately bad weather in late May did affect the survival of many young birds and brood size of fledglings averaged 5.3 (sd 2.4) young. This gives a total of 80 young produced or 4.7 (sd 2.9) young per nesting attempt.

 

2) Blue Tit

Five pairs chose to use nest boxes rather than Bat boxes this year. Two of the pairs deserted after laying 4 and 2 eggs. One pair laid the first egg on 1 April, but the average laying date was 6 April (sd 4.3 days). For the remaining three clutches (mean 11.3, sd 2.3 eggs) hatching success was excellent with 11.0 (sd 2.6) young. The final brood size was good at 11.0 (sd 2.6) young per nest, giving 33 young from the total five nesting attempts or 6.6 (sd 6.3) young per pair attempting to nest.

 

3) Stock Dove

Four pairs mated successfully, laying the first clutch on 9 April (sd 1.9) with 2 eggs in each clutch. The success of these first broods was high with 6 young being fledged. Two pairs suffered intrusions from egg-laying Mandarin ducks, but raised young regardless.

 

4) Mandarin Duck

The timing of breeding (laying of the first egg) was difficult to identify this year with brood parasitism and egg dumping being high, but it was probably 16 April (sd 11.5) with the first egg on 1 April and the last full clutch attempted 30 April.

Large clutches of 26 and 18 eggs were found and probably related to 3 and 2 females using the same nest box; Three other eggs were laid in nest boxes occupied by breeding Stock Doves. Four other females laid clutches of 10 eggs (3 birds) and 8 eggs. One of these was deserted after Grey Squirrels usurped the box. What is most surprising is that a single female incubated the clutch of 26 eggs and hatched 23 young with 20 of them successfully leaving the box; similarly the clutch of 18 hatched 16 young. There were 85 eggs laid, probably by 9 females, possibly 10, with 64 hatching and 61 ducklings leaving the nest. This is the highest rate of occupancy for this species on the Reserve (it was 6 in 1997).

 

5) Hornet

One nest box was used, this after the Mandarin brood had hatched


[Previous Year]       [Previous Section]       [Contents List]         [Next Section]         [Next Year]

APPENDIX A

 PROFILE OF THE RESERVE

The Moor Green Lakes Reserve lies partly within the area administered by Wokingham District Council and partly within the Borough of Bracknell Forest. The River Blackwater, which forms the boundary between the counties of Berkshire and Hampshire runs close to the southern boundary of the Reserve. To the north is Finchampstead Ridges, an area administered by the National Trust. A map of the Reserve appears at Appendix J

The Reserve covers an area of approximately 36 hectares (90 acres), the majority of which lies within the flood plain of the River Blackwater. It contains three lakes formed out of flooded gravel pits which are bordered by areas of grassland, planted coppice and wildflower meadow. Two of the lakes, Colebrook Lake North and Colebrook Lake South, are separated by an elongated island through the centre of which runs the old water course of the Colebrook Cut. The third lake, Grove Lake, lies immediately to the east separated by a narrow strip of land. Within the lakes are several gravel-capped islands and gravel beaches.

 

An important feature of the Reserve is the presence of sluices, at the exit of the Colebrook Cut and from Colebrook Lake into the River Blackwater, which allow the level of the water in Colebrook Lakes North and South to be controlled within certain limits. By this method, muddy margins can be exposed ahead of the main spring and autumn passage of wading birds.

 

Overall management of the Reserve is under the control of a Steering Group comprised of representatives of RMC Aggregates (Southern) Ltd., Blackwater Valley Countryside Service and the Moor Green Lakes Group. Practical day to day management and the collection, recording, assessment and dissemination of information about the Reserve is undertaken by the Moor Green Lakes. Group, which was established in 1993. The group committee members are listed in Appendix H. The necessary costs of the Group not covered by membership subscriptions are met by RMC. Membership is open to all with an interest in the reserve, its wildlife and its management,

 

Public access to the Reserve is restricted to the viewing hides provided by RMC which overlook respectively Colebrook Lake North and Grove Lake (see map at Appendix H). Unfortunately vandalism has meant that the hides cannot be left permanently open, but members of the public may use the hides whenever they are in use by members of the group (who have access at any time). The Colebrook Lake hide incorporates a viewing window for observers in wheelchairs. When the hides are locked, views over the scrapes adjacent to the hides can be obtained from the screened viewing points alongside the hides. Views across the Reserve can also be obtained from viewing points along the footpath, which runs along the western and southern sides of the Reserve.

 

The main access to the Reserve is from Lower Sandhurst Road where a car park has been provided (Ordnance Survey grid reference SU805628). The shortest access to the Grove Lake hide is from the Rambler’s Car Park at the entrance to the Horseshoe Lake Water Sports Centre off Mill Lane (grid reference SU820620).


[Previous Year]       [Previous Section]       [Contents List]         [Next Section]         [Next Year]

APPENDIX B

EVERSLEY GRAVEL PITS (INC. MOOR GREEN LAKES RESERVE)

ANNUAL BIRD REPORT 2002

Dr. Ian Brown

LITTLE GREBE Resident and winter visitor. During the breeding season five pairs were present rearing a total of 2 young. A maxima of 22 were recorded on Aug.24th.

Monthly maxima:

Jan

Feb

Mar

Apr

May

Jun

Jul

Aug

Sep

Oct

Nov

Dec

3 8 10 1 4 5 5 22 17 8 7 5

 

GREAT CRESTED GREBE Common resident. A maxima of 25 were recorded on Nov. 18th. A total of four pairs were present during the summer, one pair successfully rearing a total of 2 young.

Monthly maxima:

Jan

Feb

Mar

Apr

May

Jun

Jul

Aug

Sep

Oct

Nov

Dec

10 9 10 6 10 8 8 8 8 19 25 23

 

CORMORANT Common winter visitor that oversummers in small numbers. Recorded in all months with a maximum count of 34 on Mar. 5th

Monthly maxima:

Jan

Feb

Mar

Apr

May

Jun

Jul

Aug

Sep

Oct

Nov

Dec

29 32 34 3 6 5 6 13 9 32 7 29

 

BITTERN Rare visitor. One was seen in the phragmites behind Colebrook hide on Feb.10 (m.o) and presumably the same bird was seen again by Grove on Feb.21st (SFGF). These constitute only the third and fourth site records, the last being in 1997.

 

LITTLE EGRET Scarce visitor. Two records; One on Apr.20th (AF, TJC) and one on Dec. 16th 17th (BH, JW, RW). Recorded in four of the last five years reflecting the increased numbers in southern England.

 

GREY HERON Common resident.

Monthly maxima:

Jan

Feb

Mar

Apr

May

Jun

Jul

Aug

Sep

Oct

Nov

Dec

6 3 6 2 4 2 2 5 7 4 4 6

 

MUTE SWAN Common resident and winter visitor. One pair bred rearing 4 young.

Monthly maxima:

Jan

Feb

Mar

Apr

May

Jun

Jul

Aug

Sep

Oct

Nov

Dec

26 19 7 6 8 15 15 22 32 20 47 31

 

GREYLAG GOOSE Regular visitor. Recorded between Jan. 19th and Sept. 14th with a maximum of three on May 6th.

 

SNOW GOOSE Common resident, with birds from the nearby free flying flock regularly visiting the site. In the early and late winter periods up to 17 and 15 birds were present respectively. Although birds were present on the site in summer there was no evidence of breeding.

 

CANADA GOOSE Abundant resident.

Monthly maxima:

Jan

Feb

Mar

Apr

May

Jun

Jul

Aug

Sep

Oct

Nov

Dec

93 118 72 50 60 135 - - 250 33 104 157

 

BARNACLE GOOSE Very common resident. Seven pairs attempted to breed but no young survived due to predation.

Monthly maxima:

Jan

Feb

Mar

Apr

May

Jun

Jul

Aug

Sep

Oct

Nov

Dec

224 240 237 15 32 100 20 71 140 184 201 197

 

BRENT GOOSE Rare visitor. One was present on Nov.17th (GR et al). This is only the second site record, the first was in 1984.

 

EGYPTIAN GOOSE Regular visitor. A very good year with up to nine birds recorded between Feb. 16th and Dec.9th. One pair was present throughout May but breeding was not suspected.

 

SHELDUCK Regular visitor. Recorded as follows: 3, Apr.21st, and 1, Sept. 14-15th.

 

MANDARIN Summer visitor in increasing numbers, irregular in winter. Recorded in all months except October. Breeding birds recorded from Mar.3rd. Bred successfully in nest boxes. The maximum count was of 15 on Nov.30th (IHB) a site record.


WIGEON Very common winter visitor. Birds were recorded up to Mar.3Oth and from Aug.24th. The maximum count was of 443 on Feb.2nd.

Monthly maxima:

Jan

Feb

Mar

Apr

May

Jun

Jul

Aug

Sep

Oct

Nov

Dec

207 443 218 0 0 0 0 5 77 146 244 396

 

GADWALL Common winter visitor that oversummers. Seven males oversummered with up to two females both of which bred successfully rearing two broods totalling 15 young. This is the first (and long overdue!) confirmed breeding on the site and reserve. The count of 182 on Oct.27th (IT) was a site record count.

Monthly maxima:

Jan

Feb

Mar

Apr

May

Jun

Jul

Aug

Sep

Oct

Nov

Dec

98 39 32 7 9 7 0 22 24 182 115 108

 

TEAL Common winter visitor that occasionally summers. 1/2 birds were present irregularly through the summer but breeding was not suspected. Recorded in all months. The maximum count was 56 on Dec.22nd.

Monthly maxima:

Jan

Feb

Mar

Apr

May

Jun

Jul

Aug

Sep

Oct

Nov

Dec

23 53 40 6 6 1 1 7 19 25 34 56

 

GREEN WINGED TEAL Very rare visitor. The male present from Nov. 17th 2001 remained until Jan.27th (IHB et al).

 

MALLARD Common resident and winter visitor. Numbers may be declining.

Monthly maxima:

Jan

Feb

Mar

Apr

May

Jun

Jul

Aug

Sep

Oct

Nov

Dec

21

27

23

18

25

-

70

35

52

-

53

62

 

PINTAIL Uncommon but regular visitor. Two records: One female on Feb.2nd (CJ) and six (4 males) on Dec.28th (JH)

 

GARGANEY Rare visitor. A male on Horseshoe lake on Apr. 16th (KBB) was only the second site record, the first was in 1994 found by the same observer!

 

SHOVELER Common winter visitor. Recorded until Apr. 6th and from Jun. 2nd.  A site record count of 54 was present on Feb.9th (IHB).

Monthly maxima:

Jan

Feb

Mar

Apr

May

Jun

Jul

Aug

Sep

Oct

Nov

Dec

40 54* 28 2 0 3 2 3 8 13 18 18

 

POCHARD Common winter visitor, irregular in summer. The maximum was 79 on Dec.28th.

Monthly maxima:

Jan

Feb

Mar

Apr

May

Jun

Jul

Aug

Sep

Oct

Nov

Dec

31 68 30 1 4 0 1 2 9 21 39 79

 

TUFTED DUCK Abundant resident and winter visitor. During the summer three broods totalling 12 young were raised. Winter numbers peaked at 157 on Dec.28th.

Monthly maxima:

Jan

Feb

Mar

Apr

May

Jun

Jul

Aug

Sep

Oct

Nov

Dec

70 118 142 54 48 32 22 40 35 50 111 157

 

COMMON SCOTER Infrequent visitor. The only record was of a female on Apr.2nd (GR et al). This was the first record since 1998.

 

GOLDENEYE Winter visitor in increasing numbers. In the early year birds were recorded until Apr. 16th. First returns were from Oct.23rd.

Monthly maxima:

Jan

Feb

Mar

Apr

May

Jun

Jul

Aug

Sep

Oct

Nov

Dec

8 5 6 2 0 0 0 0 0 1 5 5

 

GOOSANDER Common winter visitor. Numbers were generally down although the roost was covered as thoroughly as in recent years. The last early year record was on the early date of Mar.24th. First returns were from Nov. 7th.

Monthly maxima:

Jan

Feb

Mar

Apr

May

Jun

Jul

Aug

Sep

Oct

Nov

Dec

24 16 9 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 22 27

 

RUDDY DUCK Occasional visitor of annual occurrence. A good year with records as follows: 1f/imm on Apr.16th, 1f/imm on Sept.29th, 1m and 2f from Oct.4th to Nov.9th, a pair remaining until Nov.18th and the male alone was present until Dec.4th.

 

SPARROWHAWK Common resident that breeds nearby.

 

BUZZARD Regular visitor. Five records; singletons on Feb.25th, Apr.20th, Aug.24th, Sept.8th and Sept.27th

 

KESTREL Common resident. One pair reared two young.

 

MERLIN Rare visitor. Three sightings of a male between Feb.2nd and 22nd (CGHW et al.) constitute only the second occurrence on the site. The first record was in 1996.

 

HOBBY Common summer visitor. Up to six birds were recorded between Apr.26th and Sept.16th.

 

PEREGRINE Infrequent visitor. A good year with four records of singletons on Jan.8th (TJC), Feb.17th (BA), Dec.14th (CRG) and Dec.24th (MP). This continues the upward trend as the species becomes more widespread in the UK. There are records in each of the last five years.

 

RED LEGGED PARTRIDGE Formerly bred. Several records in December undoubtedly related to locally introduced birds.

 

PHEASANT Common resident.

 

WATER RAIL Winter visitor. Up to two were present in both early and late winter periods.

 

MOORHEN An abundant resident.

Monthly maxima:

Jan

Feb

Mar

Apr

May

Jun

Jul

Aug

Sep

Oct

Nov

Dec

9 4 8 13 10 - - - 25 22 25 17

 

COOT Abundant resident.

Monthly maxima:

Jan

Feb

Mar

Apr

May

Jun

Jul

Aug

Sep

Oct

Nov

Dec

378 52 39 25 42 38 89 116 146 182 234 228

 

OYSTERCATCHER Occasional visitor. A good year with three records: 1, Mar.19th (CJ), 1, Apr.20th (IT) and 1, May 4th (IHB). Something of a return to the past with records in only in two of the last seven years.

 

LITTLE RINGED PLOVER Summer visitor and passage migrant. Recorded from Mar.16th until Jul. 8th. Five pairs were on the site but only one bred successfully (and that was on the reserve!) rearing two young.

 

RINGED PLOVER Summer visitor and passage migrant which formerly bred. Four records: 2, May 17th, 1, May 18th, 1, May 23rd and 1, Sept.15th.

 

LAPWING Common resident and winter visitor. Nine pairs attempted to breed rearing a total of three young. The maximum count was of 1100 on Jan.15th (IHB) a site record*.

Monthly maxima:

Jan

Feb

Mar

Apr

May

Jun

Jul

Aug

Sep

Oct

Nov

Dec

1100* 600 151 12 16 65 100 300 150 110 150 350

 

DUNLIN Regular passage migrant. A poor year with singletons on May  25th to 26th and Jul.26th.

 

COMMON SNIPE Common passage migrant and winter visitor. Recorded until May 26th and from Sept. 5th

 

BLACK TAILED GODWIT Scarce visitor. One on Mar.30th (GWB) is the first for that month and the earliest ever.

 

CURLEW Irregular visitor. One on Apr.23rd.

 

REDSHANK Summer visitor and passage migrant. One on Feb.2nd before returning birds from Mar.12th to Jul.7th. Up to two pairs were present on the reserve until June, one successfully rearing one young.

 

GREENSHANK Regular passage migrant. The records were as follows; 1, May 20th and 6, Aug. 7th.

 

GREEN SANDPIPER Winter visitor and common passage migrant. Up to four and two birds were present in the early and late winter periods respectively. Recorded until Apr.26th and from Jun.26th. Records were mainly of 1 to 3 birds, with a maxima of 5 on Mar.21st.

 

WOOD SANDPIPER Occasional visitor of annual occurrence. The only record was of one on the relatively early date of Apr.24th (EN et al.)

 

COMMON SANDPIPER Common passage migrant. A fairly poor year with records in spring of 1/4 birds between Apr.2nd and May 18th. Returns of 1/2 were from Jul.29th to Sept.8th.

 

MEDITERRANEAN GULL Uncommon visitor. One first-winter on Feb.9th (IHB) was the only record.

 

BLACK HEADED GULL Very common visitor. Recorded in all months. The largest count was of 730 on Feb.16th.

 

COMMON GULL Common winter visitor. The maximum count of 550 on Feb.16th (1HB) was a site record.

 

LESSER BLACK BACKED GULL Very common visitor. Birds roosted regularly on the Hampshire part of the site from late summer.

 

HERRING GULL Winter visitor but in reduced numbers. Small numbers roosted occasionally with Lesser Black Backed Gulls.

 

YELLOW LEGGED HERRING GULL Regular visitor of annual occurrence. Records of 2 adults, Jul.23rd and 1 third winter on Dec.28th.

 

GREAT BLACK BACKED GULL Formerly frequent winter visitor with numbers of records declining. The only record was of 1 adult on Nov.9th. All records required again for next year.

 

COMMON TERN Summer visitor and passage migrant. Recorded from Apr.14th. 16 pairs attempted to breed on Tern Island and all were successful rearing a total of 16 young. The nests were deserted by 4 pairs in July. One pair also attempted to breed unsuccessfully on the Hampshire part of the complex. Birds have now reared a total of 48 young on the reserve in the last three years. Breeding birds and young lingered in the area until Jul.27th.

 

STOCK DOVE Common resident.

 

WOOD PIGEON Abundant resident. A maximum count of 1325 on Nov.3rd.

 

COLLARED DOVE Common resident breeding nearby.

 

TURTLE DOVE Occasional visitor. Two records of singletons on May 11th and Aug.24th.

 

CUCKOO Summer visitor. Four records of up to 2 birds between Apr.21st and Jun.1st. The first breeding considered possible.

 

BARN OWL Formerly bred. Singleton on Jan. 1st relates to the bird present in December 2001.
 

LITTLE OWL Moderately common resident. Breeding was successful with three territories.

 

TAWNY OWL Moderately common resident. Breeding was successful with birds present in 2 territories.

 

SWIFT Numerous summer visitor. Recorded between May 1st and Jul.26th.

 

KINGFISHER Moderately common resident. Two pairs bred successfully.

 

GREEN WOODPECKER Common resident.

 

GREAT SPOTTED WOODPECKER Common resident.

 

LESSER SPOTTED WOODPECKER Occasional visitor. One on Dec. 8th

 

WOODLARK Irregular visitor that has bred. Two on Aug.31st probably related to post breeding dispersal from nearby sites.

 

SKYLARK Common resident and winter visitor. Four singing males held territory. Numbers appear to be declining.

 

SAND MARTIN Common summer visitor. Recorded between Mar.22nd and Sept.21st. Breeding occurred on the new workings on the Hants side of the complex but no specific counts were made.

 

SWALLOW Common summer visitor. Recorded between Apr.3rd and Oct.4th.

 

HOUSE MARTIN Abundant summer visitor.

 

MEADOW P1PIT Common winter visitor and passage migrant that has summered.

 

YELLOW WAGTAIL Moderately common passage migrant that has bred. A poor year with the only records as follows; 1, May 5th and 1, Sept.3rd.
 

GREY WAGTAIL Moderately common resident. Two pairs bred successfully.

 

PIED WAGTAIL Common resident and winter visitor.

 

WREN Abundant resident.

 

DUNNOCK Common resident.

 

ROBIN Very common resident.

 

WHINCHAT Moderately common passage migrant. Records as follows: In spring, 1, Apr.21st and 1, May 4th In autumn, 2, Sept.7th to 8th and 1, Sept.15th.

 

STONECHAT Irregular resident and passage migrant. In the early winter there were up to 3 present. In the late year 1 or 2 birds were recorded from Jul.28th with a maximum of 5 on Nov. 3rd.

 

WHEATEAR Moderately common passage migrant. In spring; 2, Apr.27th to 28th, 2, May 4th and 1, May 16th. In autumn; 1, Aug. 18th

 

BLACKBIRD Common resident.

 

FIELDFARE Common winter visitor. Recorded until Mar.24th and from Oct.26th. Maximum counts were of 200 on Mar. 12th and 120 on Dec.28th.

 

SONG THRUSH Common resident.

 

REDWING Very common winter visitor. Recorded from Oct. 12th.

 

MISTLE THRUSH Common resident.

 

SEDGE WARBLER Moderately common summer visitor. Recorded from Apr. 1st to Sept.8th. Eight singing males held territory (cf 8 in 2001)

 

REED WARBLER Moderately common summer visitor. Recorded from May 4th. Four singing males held territory (cf 5 in 2001).

 

LESSER WHITETHROAT Summer visitor. Recorded from May 4th. Two singing males held territory.

 

WHITETHROAT Very common summer visitor. Recorded between Apr.6th and Sept. 7th. Approximately 13 singing males held territory.

 

GARDEN WARBLER Very common summer visitor. Recorded from Apr. 16th. At least 19 singing males held territory (cf 13 in 2001).

 

BLACKCAP Common summer visitor and occasional winter visitor. Recorded between Mar.30th and Sept.2lst.

 

CHIFFCHAFF Common summer visitor and regular winter visitor. Recorded between Mar. 5th and Oct. 12th. Four singing males held territory.

 

WILLOW WARBLER Common summer visitor. Recorded from Apr.4th until Sept.8th. Four singing males held territory.

 

GOLDCREST Common winter visitor and passage migrant.

 

SPOTTED FLYCATCHER Regular passage migrant that may breed. The only record was of 1 on Sept. 15th.

 

LONG TAILED TIT Abundant resident.

 

COAL TIT Uncommon visitor. The only record was of 1 on Aug. 17th.

 

BLUE TIT Abundant resident.

 

GREAT TIT Abundant resident.

 

NUTHATCH Moderately common resident.

 

TREECREEPER Moderately common resident.

 

JAY Common resident.

 

MAGPIE Common resident.

 

JACKDAW Common resident.

 

ROOK Regular visitor.

 

CARRION CROW Common resident.

 

STARLING Common resident.

 

HOUSE SPARROW Common resident nearby.

 

CHAFFINCH Abundant resident and winter visitor. Maximum count of 150 on Feb.2nd.

 

BRAMBLING Regular winter visitor usually in small numbers. A very good year with a large flock remaining from 2001 on fields to the west of the reserve. Counts were of 150, Feb.9th, 100, Mar.9th, 30, Mar.31st and 1, Apr. 5th

 

GREENFINCH Common resident and winter visitor. Maximum count of 20 on Jan.27th.

 

GOLDFINCH Very common resident and winter visitor.

 

SISKIN Common winter visitor. The maximum count was 200 on Feb.16th.

 

LINNET Moderately common resident and winter visitor. The maximum count was 25 on

Dec.24th. Breeding successful.

 

LESSER REDPOLL Moderately common winter visitor. The maximum count was 70 on Mar.22nd.

 

BULLFINCH Moderately common resident.

 

YELLOWHAMMER Resident in small numbers. At least one singing male held territory. Breeding successful.

 

REED BUNTING Moderately common resident. The maximum count was 30 on Jan.27th.

 

OTHER RECORDS

 

BLACK SWAN Three on Nov.28th.

 

LIST OF OBSERVERS

 

B.M.Archer

D.Broadley

Dr I.H.Brown

J.M.Clark

K.Crick

C.Davis

S.F.G.Farmer

T.Fuller

N.R.Godden

R.J.Godden

G.Harland

C.Jones

R.Murfitt

J.O’Brien

C.Proudley

G.Randall

G.J.S.Rowland

J.B.Sheridan

G.C.Stephenson

Mrs L.D.M.Tanner

M.Walford

M.Ward

J.Westmacott

J.E.Warren

Dr K.B.Briggs

G.Brookes

G.Bryant

R.Crawford

T.J.Crompton

Mrs S.Farmer

A.Ford

C.R.Gent

R.E.Godden

B.Harland                                J.Heritage

R.Kersham

E.Napper

N.R.Peters

M.Radbourn

Mrs C.Rose

R.Rudman

N.Silver

J.C.Tanner

I.Twyford

J.Ward

R.Ward

Mrs R.Westmacott

 


[Previous Year]       [Previous Section]       [Contents List]         [Next Section]         [Next Year]

APPENDIX C

EVERSLEY GRAVEL PITS (inc MOOR GREEN LAKES)

BIRD SPECIES LIST 1990-2002

Click here to open the spreadsheet with Excel (43Kb)

If you do not have Excel, the following link provides a pdf version

Click here for a pdf version (45Kb)

Click the Back button on your Internet Browser (I.e. Explorer) to come back to this Report


[Previous Year]       [Previous Section]       [Contents List]         [Next Section]         [Next Year]

APPENDIX D

NOTES AND GUIDELINES ON BIRD RECORDING

Following the creation of Moor Green Lakes (part of the Eversley Gravel Pit complex) as a nature reserve, it is necessary to maintain a detailed log of birds using the site in order to monitor bird populations, with particular reference to conservation management carried out on the site by the Moor Green Lakes Group and RMC. These guidelines are designed to assist any persons visiting the site who wish to submit their records. The collection of such data is an important function of the group and all contributions, no matter how small are welcomed.

Recording Area

 

The boundaries of the site for recording purposes are defined as:

 

 

a)

South of the Lower Sandhurst Road

  b) West of Mill Lane
  c) East of Longwater Road
  d) North of the golf course access track running from the Reading Road to Mill Lane.

 

Information required

 

Ideally records should be submitted on Eversley Gravel Pit recording forms available from the recorder (please enclose an SAE). Records should be submitted every 3-4 months (or more frequently!) so that the log can be kept as up to date as possible. Less frequent visitors may wish to submit their records annually.

 

Where possible the following information should be provided:­

  

 

1)

Name of species (include age/sex if known)

  2) Number of individuals (accurate counts particularly useful)
  3) Date of observation (and time if a fly over only sighting or short stay record)
  4) Site location
  5) Other observations such as unusual behaviour or direction off flight of birds flying over, etc.
  6) Observer(s) initials. Records not submitted on forms should also include name and address
  7) Accompanying field notes if required.

 

The species list for the site at Appendix C includes a code number in the left hand column. This refers to the type of records required for that species. The full details are:

 

  1*=

All records required. Please submit notes on the sighting with the record. These notes should include details of the diagnostic identification features which were observed at the time, other species nearby, the duration and distance of the observation, weather conditions, optical aids used and previous experience of the species.

  1 = All records required.
  2 = Whole site counts, reserve area counts, breeding summary (number of pairs and young, singing males), early/late dates for summer and winter visitors, movements, unusual dates   and interesting behaviour.
  3 = Breeding summary only.
  4 = Only unusual records for the species e.g. high counts, early breeding records.

  
Records should be sent to: lan Brown, 4 Evesham Walk, Sandhurst, Berks. GU46 0YU

Sightings of birds in category 1*, would be gratefully received by phone (01344 778412), particularly if still present, to enable dissemination of information to other interested observers!


[Previous Year]       [Previous Section]       [Contents List]         [Next Section]         [Next Year]

APPENDIX E

NOTES AND GUIDELINES ON DRAGONFLY RECORDING

Any person visiting the site who wishes to submit dragonfly/damselfly records may do so. Any attributable records are gratefully received. Observers may add their records to the monthly dragonfly posted in both Grove and Colebrook hides.

 

Alternatively records of a more detailed nature may be submitted at any time direct to the recorder but for preference before the end of October. If submitted after the end of October the data will be logged on to the Reserve’s database but may be too late for inclusion in the Annual Report.

 

Records can be presented in any form that best suits the observer but should include:

 

        Observer’s name and address
        Date/Time/Weather
        Site location, i.e.:
  Colebrook Lake North (CLN)
  Colebrook Lake South (CLS)
  Colebrook Cut (CC)
  Grove Lake (GL)
  Horseshoe Lake
  River Blackwater and path (BR)

 

        Name(s) of species observed
 
        For each species observed at each site an estimate of the number of:
  Adults
  copulating pairs
  ovipositing females

 

All records should be sent to the Recorder: Ken Crick, 29 Village Way, Yateley, Hants GU46 7SE. Information on sightings of rare or unusual species would be welcomed by phone (01252 872508).


[Previous Year]       [Previous Section]       [Contents List]         [Next Section]         [Next Year]

APPENDIX F

pH SURVEY 2001 - 2002

 Ken Crick

Last year’s report went to print with the year long pH survey incomplete due to the need to meet the August issue dead line. The graphs contributing to this Chapter repeat last year’s data along with the unpublished data set that completes the 12-month period, ending in June 2002.

The upwelling of water that clearly characterized the spring on the northern shore of Colebrook Lake (A2) completely disappeared on the 24 January 2002, when cattle grazing the site entered the water at this point compressing the bank. As of the 23 September 2002 the upwelling was still not apparent. Water levels also rose significantly in January and throughout the remainder of the trial period the location of the spring could only be estimated. Temperature levels at this point no longer remained near constant, but followed the rise and fall of the lake as a whole.

It is interesting to note that despite quite large excursions in pH throughout the year at all the measurement locations, nine of the locations recorded pH levels for June 2002 that were within 0.3 of the June 2001 data. The largest disparity between the June 2001 and June 2002 figures occurred at the disrupted spring (A2), where the variance was plus 0.8.

It would appear that the results published here are generally in line with average water conditions found elsewhere. John Clegg in his book Freshwater Life, 1974 edition Appendix I published by Warne ISBN 0723217629, states ".... in average water, the pH will be at its highest in the summer when photosynthesis is rapid and lowest in winter when much of the vegetation of the past summer is decomposing, but it will vary from day to day, hour to hour and from place to place, in the same lake". Typical values for one locality are for weedy ponds in summer pH 8; stagnant ditches rich in decomposing matter 7.2; ponds with much animal life and only average numbers of plants 7.8 .For those with a passing interest in p11, what it is and its relative importance to freshwater life, this book is worth a visit.

Spot checks were taken at location A2 on the 26 July and the 28 August 2002, which resulted in readings of pH 8.8 and 7.1 respectively. By the 17 September the pH at A2 had dipped a further three points to 6.8.

RMC Aggregates provided the Reserve with a water level gauge board at the beginning of January 2002 and it is located in the cut opposite the door to Colebrook Hide. Fluctuations in water levels are of interest to the management team in the future control of Crassula helmsii and a quantitative assessment of the control of water levels by the current sluice.

MOOR GREEN pH SURVEY

pH VERSES WEEK NUMBER. Week No 1= 3rd week in June 2001. Week 32=2nd week in June 2002


[Previous Year]       [Previous Section]       [Contents List]         [Next Section]         [Next Year]

APPENDIX G

NEST BOX REVIEWS FROM 2000 AND 2001

Dr Kevin Briggs

NEST BOXES 2000

The breeding season was delayed by cold weather and truncated by a wet and windy period in late May/early June that affected the fledging of many young birds. The occupancy rate was 59%, very low. Hornets occupied one Tit box for the first time.

1) Great Tit

Ten pairs of birds occupied nest boxes with the first egg being laid on 14 April. The mean laying date was 16 April (sd 1.9 days). Clutches were large (mean 9.5, sd 1.8 eggs) and no pairs deserted. From the 95 eggs laid 86 hatched (mean brood size at hatching 8.6, sd 1.5) but only 34 fledged. The mean brood size at fledging was 4.4, sd 2.3 young, but as 3 broods died and some pairs fledged only 2 or 3 young the mean brood size per nesting attempt was 3.4 (sd 2.9) young.

2) Blue Tit

The number of Blue Tits using the nest boxes is declining, as they prefer the Bat boxes. There has been a steady increase in the number of Bat boxes involved; 2 in 1998, 4 in 1999 and 8 in 2000. So the overall population is not decreasing, it is just that they cannot be monitored effectively.

Only 3 pairs used boxes and the mean laying date was 15 April (sd 3.2 days). Clutches were small (mean 9.3, sd 3.0 eggs), but hatching success high (mean brood 8.6, sd 3.0 young). The poor weather, however, reduced the number of young fledged to only 13 (mean brood size 4.3, sd 2.1)

3) Tawny Owl

One pair fledged two young from a clutch of 2 eggs laid on 20 March.

4) Little Owl

Three young were fledged from a clutch of 4 eggs laid on 21 April by one pair.

5) Stock Dove

Only the first broods were followed for 4 pairs that bred in boxes. Mean laying date was 22 April (sd 11.2 days) for the four clutches of 2 eggs, which produced 5 fledged young (mean 1.25, sd 0.5)

6) Mandarin Duck

A poor year with only one pair being recorded in a nest box. The clutch of 12 eggs, laid from 20 April, was successful, hatching 12 ducklings that successfully left the nest box. 

NEST BOXES 2001

The foot and mouth epidemic delayed the start of the Nest Box Monitoring and prevented the laying dates of clutches from being clearly established in some cases. The occupancy rate was 76%, which is average, but to this total could also be added 2 Hornet nests and 2 quarter-built Blue Tit nests that then used Bat boxes in the same tree.

1) Great Tit

Sixteen pairs laid in the nest boxes, ranging from 18 April to 10 May (mean date 27 April, sd 7.5 days). However, in one box a female was found dead on a clutch of 4 eggs. This was removed and subsequently another pair occupied the box and raised young. This effectively gives 17 nesting attempts. Unfortunately, the largest clutch (12 eggs) was predated by a Great Spotted Woodpecker during incubation. The 17 clutches ranged in size from 4 — 12 (mean size 8.35, sd 1.90) eggs and from the 142 eggs, 112 hatched (mean brood size for all 17 pairs 6.58, sd 2.7 young). For the 15 successful pairs the mean brood size at hatching was 7.46, sd 1.3 young. Despite the poor weather the fledging success was high with successful pairs fledging on average 6.0 (sd 1.03 young) and all nesting attempts raising a mean of 5.29 (sd 2.16) young.

2) Blue Tit

Only three pairs laid eggs and of these one deserted a clutch of 4 eggs. The mean laying date was 24 April (sd 3 days). The two remaining pairs (clutches of 14 and 11 eggs) fledged 20 young between them. The breeding success for all pairs is 6.67 (sd 4.9) young per breeding attempt. The trend for this species to use Bat boxes continues, 7 pairs nested again this year.

3) Tawny Owl

One pair laid 2 eggs in a nest box and had fledged 2 young by 21 May.

4) Stock Dove

Only 2 pairs bred and reared 6 young in 5 nesting attempts.

5) Mandarin Duck

The normal clutch size for Mandarin is 7 — 12 eggs and is usually 9 per female. One box had 18 eggs on 3 May and must have resulted from 2 females laying in the same box, brood parasitism. Surprisingly only one female incubated and hatched 16 eggs; often such clutches are deserted. The brood of 14 young was seen shortly after hatching in late May. Mandarin occupied three other boxes, but one clutch of 5 eggs was deserted. Judging by the feathers in the nest box, the female had a close encounter with a Tawny Owl. In total 38 eggs were laid and 32 young hatched and dispatched from the boxes by 4, or possibly 5 females. Mean laying date was thought to be 25 April (sd 4.0 days).


[Previous Year]       [Previous Section]       [Contents List]         [Next Section]         [Next Year]

APPENDIX H

MOOR GREEN LAKES GROUP COMMITTEE MEMBERS

2002-2003

Officer Committee Post/Responsibilities
Ken Crick* Chairman / Report Editor / Recorder for Dragonfly and Damselfly
Dr Delphine Hoyle Vice-Chairman and Recorder for Plants
Peter Scott Secretary / Recorder for Reptiles
Sue Dent Blackwater Valley Countryside Service Representative
Amanda Simpson-Atkins Sunday Working Party Organiser
Chris Rose Treasurer / Report Compiler
Sheila Farmer Membership Secretary
Dr Kevin Briggs* Reserve Consultant
Dr lan Brown Recorder for Birds
Katrina Slocombe Recorder for Mammals
Sue Proudley Recorder for Butterflies
Steve Farmer Reserve Manager / Newsletter Editor
Peter Standley*  

* Represents Moor Green Lakes Group on the Steering Group.   

NOTE

At the A.G.M of February 2003 Ken Crick resigned as Chairman of the Group and Peter Scott took up the post. Robert Godden then took his position as Committee Secretary.

Peter Scott can be contacted on ppscott(at)aol.com


[Previous Year]       [Previous Section]       [Contents List]         [Next Section]         [Next Year]

APPENDIX I

Moor Green Lakes Nature Reserve Reference Library

The contents of the library so far collected are listed below.

Site survey data  
Anon.1993. Plant list for Moor Green Lakes. (Farnborough College student report).
Briggs, K. 2001 Moor Green Lakes Nature Reserve; ornithological monitoring 2000.
Brown, I. 1993 Eversley Gravel Pits Bird Species List.
BVRCMS 2000 Survey data. (Includes a number of minor surveys with Moor Green records).
Crick, K. 1999 Moor Green Lakes Odonata population survey, benchmark Report 1997-99.
Gannaway, H. 1997 The distribution of small mammals at Moor Green Lakes - (Farnborough College student report)
Hall C, 1991 Botanical survey
Hearn, R, 1993 The management of disused mineral workings as habitat for waterbirds. (Farnborough College student report).
Lovesey, E. 1997 Spider survey
Matthes, G. 1997 Hoverfly surveys 1995 -1997.
Smith, M. 2001 Bracknell Forest Borough Council Invertebrate Survey 2000.
Tomlinson D. 1995 A live trapping investigation of small mammal populations at Moor Green Lakes Nature Reserve. (Farnborough College student report).
Hall C, 2001 A survey of Aquatic and Wetland Plants, August - September 2001
   
Site management  
Fourt D, 2000 Moor Green Lakes pH & liming records.
McAll, G. Undated Management Plan for Moor Green Lakes (draft plan for BBONT, never adopted).
   
Group administration  
Annual reports: A complete set from the 1st report in 1994.
Moor Green News: A full set of the Group Newsletters
Moor Green Lakes Group Management Committee: A complete set of minutes

I would like to request that if anybody has information about the reserve, however small, please could they deposit a copy in the library. I shall be able to copy it and return the originals.

If any body would like to view the information please contact me Steve Bailey on 01252 331353 to make arrangements.


[Previous Year]       [Previous Section]       [Contents List]         [Next Section]         [Next Year]

APPENDIX J

Map of the Reserve

Habitat Map

[Previous Year]       [Previous Section]       [Contents List]         [Next Section]         [Next Year]

Manor Farm Restoration Plan - 2002


[Previous Year]       [Previous Section]       [Contents List]         [Next Section]         [Next Year]

ANNEX

MOOR GREEN LAKES NATURE RESERVE

TEN-YEAR SUMMARY, 1993 TO 2003

CREATION OF THE RESERVE

RMC Aggregates (Southern) Ltd [RMC], through its predecessor company, purchased the land now developed as the Moor Green Lakes Nature Reserve in the late 1960’s. Planning permission to extract sand and gravel was granted by Berkshire County Council in 1982 and required RMC to implement an ambitious restoration scheme in order to both replace and create wildlife habitats. Extraction commenced in 1983 and finished five years later. By 1992 the Reserve of 36 hectares was largely formed, comprising wildflower meadows, plantations, scrapes, islands and open water.

View from Colebrook Hide

In 1998 RMC’s development of the Reserve, and adjoining areas forming part of the same quarry, was recognised by the presentation of a restoration award by the European Aggregates Association

THE MOOR GREEN LAKES GROUP

The Moor Green Lakes Nature Reserve Steering Group was formed in 1993 to provide overall management of the Reserve and continues to fulfil that task. It originally comprised representatives of RMC, Berkshire County Council, Blackwater Valley Recreation and Countryside Management Service, the local Naturalists' Trust (BBONT) and two consultants and remains in a similar form today. An early decision of the Group was to involve the local community in a support group for practical management, data recording and interpretation. To that end, the Steering Group hosted a public meeting on 28th April 1993 at Eversley Village Hall "with a view of forming a Local Support Group for the Reserve at the former quarrying operations".

The Moor Green Lakes Group sprang from this and had its inaugural meeting at the same venue on 19th May 1993 to assess priority tasks that could be undertaken. By 1994 it had a membership of 60 and a committee of 6, with Peter Standley as chairman, Kevin Briggs as secretary and Mark Taylor as treasurer.

A hide provided by RMC was erected by Colebrook Lake and opened on 6th July 1994 by Councillors Trembake and Collett. The first Annual Report was produced. In 1995 guided walks were taken round the Reserve and the first Annual General Meeting was held. The second hide was opened on 24th September 1997 by John Craven of the BBC’s Countryfile programme. 

By 1999 there were 300 members and a periodic Newsletter (Moor Green News) was introduced. In 2001 Peter Standley stood down as chairman after eight years of excellent work and Ken Crick took office, enthusiastically producing a new Management Plan for the Reserve. Committee members were involved in advising RMC over the restoration plans for the adjoining Manor Farm quarrying operations with proposals for the establishment of reed beds. In 2003 the group has over 400 members.

Concervation work on Colebrook Lake

CONSERVATION

Management of the Reserve is all-important if diversity is to be maintained and enhanced.

Practical work by volunteers started in January 1994. Viewing slots were cut and islands and scrapes were cleared. Compartments were fenced to allow cattle-grazing in rotation around the Reserve the following year. Paths were resurfaced to allow disabled access to the hide, which was unfortunately vandalised and so had to be locked. In 1997 the perimeter fencing was made fully stock-proof, new signs erected and rafts floated for breeding terns (plus Canada Geese and Coots!). Volunteers continued the annual round of scrub-cutting, bramble, scrape and island clearance, gate-closing and cattle-watching.

In 1998 contractors were used for tree felling for the first time. Bat boxes (43) and bird boxes (35) were erected and monitored annually (bringing in hornets to the Reserve!). Car park improvements were made, partly to combat the vandalism and theft which had become a problem, and more new signs were erected. In 2002 the new Management Plan was completed with easy-to-follow guidelines. The anti-mink fence was erected on Tern Island, a reptile hibernaculum was created and efforts were begun to eliminate (or at least limit) the invasive Australian Swamp Stonecrop.

Wildlife surveys are important in assessing the success of the management programme, as well as providing results that are interesting in themselves. Birds, dragonflies, butterflies and plants have been monitored on a fairly consistent basis for much of the last ten years, while other groups have also been surveyed, but less regularly.

BIRDS

The newly-created water bodies at the Reserve had attracted over 130 species by 1994 when specific recording started. The site was notable locally for breeding Ringed Plover, Little Ringed Plover, Redshank, Lapwing and Common Tern, all of which used the gravel islands.

Gadwall

Yearly recording has highlighted a succession of interesting passage birds and notable ‘firsts’ for the Reserve: 

  • Temmick’s Stint and Great Grey Shrike were new species in 1993;

  • the following year, Garganey, Nightingale, Firecrest and Crossbill were added to the records, with a long-staying Smew and 79 Goosanders providing a winter spectacle;

  • in 1995 a wintering Red-necked Grebe was present, in summer the feral Snow Geese bred on site for the first time and an introduced Barn Owl bred nearby and hunted the Reserve. A Hoopoe was present from September until January of the following year;

  • a Black-necked Grebe, Red Kite, Glaucous Gull and Bean Goose increased the species tally in 1996, with improved management techniques increasing the winter Wigeon count to 256 and Goosanders to 124;

  • new birds continued to occur in 1997: Ring-billed Gull, Bittern and Honey Buzzard were all logged and 184 Goosanders roosted in January;

  • in 1998, 391 Coot wintered and Gadwall numbers reached 210. A Shore Lark caused great excitement and Marsh Harrier, Nightjar and Little Egret occurred on the Reserve;

  • the seventh Annual Report recorded monthly maximum totals of wildfowl and included the latest addition to the Reserve’s list of a gale-blown Great Skua in July;

  • 2000 brought a Red-necked Phalarope in May and 12 Hobbies together in June. A complete Common Bird Census of the Reserve recorded 57 breeding species with 400 territories;

  • the year 2001 hosted a record 585 Wigeon and three new species - Green Winged Teal, Lesser Yellowlegs and Ring-necked Parakeet - bringing the Reserve’s all-time tally to 201 species.

MAMMALS

 

In 1993 twenty-one species of mammal had been reported on the Reserve ranging from Pygmy Shrew to Roe Deer. Water Shrew was first recorded in 1994 and Weasel in 2000. Roe Deer are most easily seen with up to 10 together, but mammal-trapping has shown Wood Mice to be the most numerous. Water Vole is the only species to have gone unrecorded.

Specialist surveys of bats have revealed 6 species to be using the Reserve. The large numbers of flying insects found above the lakes and the adjacent river form an important food source, and the site also provides valuable links between the river and potential roost sites on Finchampstead Ridges.

 

AMPHIBIANS, REPTILES AND FISH

Common Frog, Common Toad, Grass Snake and Adder have been found on the Reserve. Common Lizard and Slow Worm are likely to be present, but have not yet been reported. Only 5 species of fish have been recorded.

INVERTEBRATES

Dragonflies

The locality has long been a hot spot for this group and between 1986 and 1994 twenty species were reported. The tally grew in the following two years with Four-spotted Chaser and Yellow-winged Darter occurring. Detailed systematic monitoring from 1998 brought in the Downy Emerald Dragonfly in June and a knowledge of how individual populations were fairing in specific areas of the Reserve. 2001 was an excellent year with 22 species recorded including three sightings of the Golden-ringed Dragonfly. Populations of most species decreased in 2002, for reasons which are not yet clear.

Butterflies and Moths

By 1991 the Reserve area had yielded 21 species of butterfly, but none of them very abundant. The following three years increased the total with Large Skipper, Grayling and Small Blue being reported. Marbled White was recorded in 1996. The monitoring now records 19 to 21 species per year with weather playing a major role in perceived abundance. Moths have only been light-trapped once, in 1995, when 62 species were recorded in June and July, including Elephant and Poplar Hawk Moths.

Banded DemoiselleCommon Blue?

 

 

 

 

 

Other Groups

Little regular monitoring of other invertebrates has been undertaken and recorders are being encouraged to undertake this. Occasional surveys indicate considerable variety both on the Reserve and in the immediate locality:

  • a survey of aquatic invertebrates in 2000 found numerous species of freshwater snail, crustaceans, mites and several insect groups (including dragonfly nymphs);

  • a survey by Bracknell District Council in 2000, including Grove Lake, produced 208 invertebrate species, including a rare cuckoo wasp;

  • a survey in April 2001 recorded 199 species of beetles and spiders, over 100 of them previously unrecorded on the Reserve.

PLANTS

A general survey of the Reserve’s locality in 1982 recorded 96 species. Systematic surveying from 1993 to 1995 increased this total. Exciting plants such as Fen Bedstraw, Hairy Tare and Sharp-flowered Rush all occur. 

Quantified investigations of permanent quadrats have been used since 1998 to monitor the sown-flower meadows and assess the grazing regime. The original seed mixture included 23 species, of which 18 were found in or close to the quadrats in 2002. Predominant species are Ox-eye Daisy, Black Knapweed and Ribwort Plantain, with Bents and Yorkshire Fog being the most prominent grasses.

The plants are not only important in their own right. Many of them provide food and habitat for a variety of animal groups. Nettle, for example, while not visually attractive, is vital to certain butterflies; hence its increase on the Reserve is welcome, provided it does not reduce the variety of other species.

Ox-eye Daisies north of Colebrook Lake

An aquatic plant survey in 2001 found 76 species with Colebrook North being the most diverse, having 32 species. The Reserve held 2 nationally-rare species (Pillwort and Hair­like Pondweed), as well as 4 regionally and 6 locally-rare species, giving the Reserve an important ecological status. Unfortunately it also held four alien species, one of which, Australian Swamp Stonecrop, is a huge conservation problem. 

SUMMARY

The survey results described above show that the Group’s efforts to maintain diverse habitats on the Reserve have been largely successful. As membership continues to grow, we can be confident that conditions for wildlife will be sustained for the foreseeable future. Indeed, as the restoration of the Manor Farm site is completed, we hope to extend our activities to include the new areas. In particular, creation of a large reed bed will add new habitat and increase both our responsibilities and the interesting wildlife on view. 

Original text and photographs by

DR. KEVIN  BRIGGS

[Last Year]       [Previous Section]       [Contents List]      [Top of Page]         [Next Section]         [Next Year]


© 2007 - 2011: Web site contents are copyright Moor Green Lakes Group - All rights reserved

Copyright of images remain with the photographer where indicated