| |
This
10th Anniversary report has been sponsored by RMC Aggregates (Southern)
Ltd.
The Moor Green Lakes Nature Reserve was born out of
the extraction of sand and gravel by RMC. The 36 ha.
site was designed for such conservation purposes from the outset.
RMC wishes to acknowledge the major contribution
made over the last decade by members of the Moor Green Lakes Group to
the increasing interests of the Reserve and looks forward to continuing
the partnership in the years ahead.
RMC Aggregates Southern,) Ltd
RMC House
Coldharbour Lane
Thorpe, Egham
SurreyTW20 8RA
Tel. 01932 583600 |
|
[Previous Year]
[Previous
Section]
[Contents List]
[Next Section] [Next Year]
CHAPTER 1
INTRODUCTION TO THE TENTH REPORT OF THE
MOOR GREEN LAKES GROUP
Ken Crick
Chairman of the Moor Green Lakes Group
It is with some sadness
that I commit pen to paper as I relinquish the role of Chairman of the
Group. Your new chairman will be Peter Scott, who will be well known to the
volunteers who work on the Reserve, and who, I am sure, will make an
excellent chairman.
This report marks the tenth
anniversary of the Group’s formation. Kevin Briggs has kindly produced a
summary of developments over the ten years, presented as an Annex within the
report.
This year has been the
first in which work was guided by the new Management Plan. We succeeded in
completing all the scheduled tasks and some unforeseen extras. One of those
extras was the result of the summer break-in to Colebrook Hide, when one
view-port hatch was completely destroyed. Entry was achieved through the
hatch provided for disabled members, hence the increased strands of barbed
wire in. front of this port. The: perpetrators also left some unpleasant
personal waste behind them. Towards the end of the summer the hide was left
unlocked on a number of occasions. I. can only beg members to be extra
vigilant when leaving the hides ensuring they are locked, with all of the
combination digits frilly scrambled, A second failed attempt to gain entry
to the hide, by forcing the door, was made over the Christmas Holiday
period, the door and jam receiving further damage.
Just before Christmas we
lost the services of Amanda and Julian Simpson-Atkins, who have led work
parties on the reserve for eight years. We wish them well in their new life
in Shropshire.
Casual observations
recorded toad spawn for the first time on the north shore of Colebrook Lake
North at pH Measuring Station A2 (see Appendix F, 2001 Report). Large
numbers of whirligig beetles were also in evidence.
All the recorders are to be
congratulated and thanked for their sterling efforts throughout the year, as
are those of you that complete the monthly sighting record sheets in the
hides. Without this input from recorders and members this report and an
objective and focused management of the reserve would not be possible.
I would like to thank the
members of the committee for their assistance and support throughout my
two-year tenure. Also the Blackwater Valley Countryside staff for their
advice and work-party leadership, along with those members whose voluntary
work on the reserve maintains the diverse habitats and associated wildlife,
while keeping the site visibly accessible to members and the general public.
This year’s AGM was
followed by a succinct and thought-provoking talk on biodiversity, given by
Andy Glencross, Wokingham District Council’s Biodiversity Officer. He helped
to put into context our small efforts within the overall thrust for nature
conservation within the UK.
[Previous Year]
[Previous
Section]
[Contents List]
[Next Section] [Next Year]
CHAPTER 2
CONSERVATION WORK PROGRAMME
APRIL 2002 TO MARCH 2003
Sue
Dent
The most important
contribution to the site management this year was the introduction of the
Moor Green Lakes Management Plan, which represents a real step forward in
the management of the site. It has been put together by a team led by Ken
Crick, who then wrote the plan itself. In its first year the Plan has
provided a structure to the work on the reserve and a real incentive,
showing that jobs were being done and targets achieved. After its first year
of operation the plan will be revised to iron out any wrinkles that have
been found and it will then run for five years.
A thank you.. and a
farewell
As always the conservation
work on the reserve has been enthusiastically supported by volunteers on
both the regular Sunday tasks run by the Moor Green Lakes Group and on
Tuesdays with the Blackwater Valley Countryside Volunteers. A total of 14
tasks were attended by an average of 11 volunteers - a tremendous total of
155 volunteer days and a huge amount of management work done on the site.
Many thanks to everyone who has come along and to the group committee who
organise the work to be done so efficiently
In December Amanda and
Julian Simpson-Atkins moved away from the area. Amanda has led the Sunday
work parties on Moor Green for three years and has made a huge contribution
to the success of the group, not least by helping to establish such a
friendly and welcoming atmosphere that volunteers have wanted to keep coming
back. They will be sorely missed.
Conservation Tasks
-
Keeping islands clear
of vegetation. A special effort was made this year to catch up with
work on the islands. Tern Island and Plover Island have both been cleared
of vegetation to provide the open shingle preferred by breeding birds. Two
paths have been cleared across Grove Lake Island; again it is hoped to
provide habitat for breeding birds. It was also possible to tackle a
substantial area of Long Island, in part thanks to the work of a party of
students from Farnborough College of Technology who practised their
management skills very effectively on the bramble and gorse.
-
Cutting viewing slots
alongside the lake, the volunteers cleared one area with the remainder
done by Julian Simpson-Atkins as a contractor.
-
Grassland. The
small meadow next to Colebrook Hide was cut and raked this year. A cut
every 3 years will maintain it as rough grassland rather than scrub. The
battle with encroaching bramble and scrub on the grassland and willow
around the edge of the lake continues, with some substantial areas cleared
this year.
-
Grazing. It was
possible to graze the site rather earlier than usual this year, which
meant that the cattle (and calves this year) had time to do their job and
leave the site before the ground became too wet and liable to poaching.
Many thanks to the volunteers who helped us with checking the cattle
during their stay. They are a great bonus to the site management, but we
couldn’t manage them without volunteer help in keeping an eye on them.
-
Around the Reserve.
The area around the entrance to Colebrook Hide was cleared and it is hoped
that regular cutting in future will keep the area open. Another stretch of
hedge, on the footpath south of Colebrook Hide, has been laid.
-
Crassula. The only
real cloud on the horizon from the point of view of the management of the
reserve is Crassula helmsii, which will be an on-going battle for the
foreseeable future. Progress has been slow this year, but we now have
permission from the Environment Agency to use herbicide to kill Crassula
where it grows along the shoreline. It is hoped that this will limit the
impact on bird populations by keeping the scrapes reasonably clear and
open. The experiment with using carpet to smother Crassula on Grove Lake
has worked, partially. The weed under the carpet is dead, but more has
established itself on top. The carpet will be carefully removed in Spring
(2003) and any remaining areas will be spot-sprayed.
[Previous Year]
[Previous
Section]
[Contents List]
[Next Section] [Next Year]
CHAPTER
3
REPORT ON BIRDS FOR 2002
Dr Ian Brown
At the
beginning of the year duck numbers were generally down compared to recent
years, but nevertheless there was still a good variety on offer including a
record count for the site of 54 Shoveler in February and a Pintail.
Goosander still roosted in moderate numbers throughout. There was a very
good selection of other species including Barn Owl, Peregrine, a large flock
of Brambling, Merlin (only second recorded individual on the site),
Mediterranean Gull and Bittern, while the Green Winged Teal remained until
late January.
Considering the water levels were relatively high throughout the spring,
there was a good selection of passage waders in quality if not quantity,
including Black Tailed Godwit, 3 Oystercatchers, an early Wood Sandpiper,
Curlew, Greenshank, Dunlin and Little Stint. Other records included the
second site record of Garganey, plus Little Egret, Common Scoter and a good
scattering of passerines such as Wheatear and Whinchat.
Overall
the breeding season was successful for a wide range of species, most notably
the first successful breeding of Gadwall after many years of waiting! Waders
enjoyed moderate success with Redshank and Lapwing both rearing young,
although Little Ringed Plover failed. Once again the most obvious success
was of Common Terns with 15 nests on Tern Island, although not all raised
broods as a number of nests were deserted. Other notable breeding was of
Mandarin, Barnacle Goose, Tufted Duck (several broods), Kingfisher and Grey
Wagtail.
Autumn
was generally very quiet with a small wader passage, the appearance of 3
Ruddy Ducks (remaining until November), single Firecrest and Brent Goose,
the latter of which was only the second site record, the first being in
1984. The year closed with duck numbers building and December records of
Peregrine and Little Egret.
[Previous Year]
[Previous
Section]
[Contents List]
[Next Section] [Next Year]
CHAPTER 4
BOTANICAL SURVEY 2002
Dr Delphine Hoyle
Quantitative surveys of the meadow areas on the North and West sides of
Colebrook Lake North have been undertaken since 1997. Prior to that overall
records of the plants occurring on the reserve have been kept since 1992.
The
method used is based on National Vegetational Classification Methodology and
the 2002 survey was carried out on 13 July. Ten random samples (1 x 1 metre)
were taken, five on the north side and five on the west side of Colebrook
Lake North. In each of the sample squares the species present were
identified and quantified on the abundance present –
| 1. |
<4 % few
individuals |
6. |
26-33 % |
| 2. |
<4 %
several individuals |
7. |
34-50 % |
| 3. |
<4 % many
individuals |
8. |
51-75 % |
| 4. |
4-10% |
9. |
76-90% |
| 5. |
11-25% |
10. |
91-100% |
In addition the frequency of occurrence was
also recorded -
|
I |
1-20 % |
(1 in 5
samples) |
|
II |
21-40% |
(2 in 5
samples) |
|
III |
41-60% |
(3 in 5
samples) |
|
IV |
61-80% |
(4 in 5
samples) |
|
V |
81-100% |
(5 in 5
samples) |
Table A gives the frequency and abundance of
the species found in the samples. Table B lists other species noted
in the immediately surrounding areas.
Predominant species have remained remarkably
constant over the survey period -Table C - and the majority of originally
sown species are still present - Table D. Few new species have appeared over
the last five years.
The site has, however, become much more
“patchy”, with big areas of nettle and bramble, mainly around the area
surveyed.
The help of all those who have taken part in
the survey work is gratefully acknowledged.
Table A
|
LATIN NAME |
COMMON NAME |
COLEBROOK LAKE NORTH |
|
North |
West |
|
S |
Achillea millefolium |
Yarrow |
II (9) |
0 |
|
S |
Centaurea nigra |
Black knapweed |
III (1-9) |
V (7-9) |
|
|
Centarium
erythraea |
Common centaury |
I (2) |
0 |
|
|
Cerastium fontanum |
Common mouse-ear |
I (5) |
0 |
|
|
Cirsium arvense |
Creeping Thistle |
I (2) |
I (4) |
|
|
Crategus monogyna |
Hawthorn seedling |
I (1) |
0 |
|
|
Crepis spp |
Hawkweed |
I (1) |
0 |
|
S |
Daucus carota |
Wild carrot |
III (1) |
II (5-7) |
|
S |
Galium verum |
Lady’s bedstraw |
III (2-4) |
II (6-7) |
|
|
Geranium dissectum |
Cut-leaved cranesbill |
I (1) |
I (1) |
|
S |
Geranium pratense |
Meadow Cranesbill |
0 |
I (1) |
|
S |
Hypericum perforatum |
Perforate St.John’s
wort |
11 (1) |
I (2) |
|
S |
Hypochoeris radicata |
Common catsear |
I (2) |
0 |
|
|
Lathyrus pratensis |
Meadow vetchling |
I (5) |
I (8) |
|
S |
Leucanthemum vulgare |
Ox-eye daisy |
V (4-9) |
IV (1-7) |
|
S |
Lotus corniculatus |
Bird’s-foot trefoil |
II (4-6) |
III (2-6) |
|
|
Lychnis
flos-cuculi |
Ragged Robin |
0 |
I (1) |
|
S |
Medicago lupulina |
Black medick |
II (7-8) |
0 |
|
S |
Plantago lanceolata |
Ribwort plantain |
V (1-9) |
V (1-8) |
|
S |
Prunella vulgaris |
Selfheal |
I (2) |
I (1) |
|
|
Quercus robur |
Oak seedling |
I (1) |
0 |
|
S |
Ranunculus acris |
Meadow buttercup |
0 |
I (2) |
|
|
Ranunculus repens |
Creeping buttercup |
III (1-5) |
IV (6-10) |
|
S |
Rumex acetosa |
Sorrel |
I (2) |
II (1) |
|
|
Rumex spp |
Dock spp. |
II (1) |
I (2) |
|
|
Seneciojacobaea |
Ragwort |
III (1-2) |
0 |
|
|
Stachys officinalis |
Betony |
0 |
I (1) |
|
|
Stellaria graminea |
Lesser stitchwort |
IV (1-4) |
III (1-5) |
|
|
Trifolium pratense |
Red clover |
V (1-9) |
II (5-8) |
|
|
Trifolium repens |
White clover |
II (6-9) |
I (4) |
|
S |
Vicia sativa |
Common vetch |
I (3) |
0 |
|
S |
Vicia tetrasperma |
Smooth Tare |
III (1-4) |
IV (1-5) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Agrostis spp. |
Bent spp. |
V (4-9) |
V (4-6) |
|
|
Holcus lanatus |
Yorkshire Fog |
III (4-7) |
IV (57) |
|
|
Poa spp |
Meadow Grass |
0 |
I (1) |
|
|
Vulpia bromoides |
Squirrel-tail Fescue |
II (6-7) |
0 |
Note: S = Sown species
Table B
Other plants recorded outside the sample squares
| |
LATIN NAME |
COMMON NAME |
| |
Agrimonia eupatoria |
Agrimony |
| |
Anagallis arvensis |
Scarlet pimpernel |
| |
Arctium minus agg |
Lesser burdock |
| |
Arrhenatherum elatius |
False oat grass |
| |
Artemisia vulgaris |
Mugwort |
| |
Dactylis glomerata |
Cocksfoot |
| |
Deschampsia cespitosa |
Tufted hair-grass |
| |
Elymus repens |
Couch grass |
| |
Epilobium spp |
Willowherb |
| |
Filago vulgaris |
Common cudweed |
| |
Fraxinus excelsior |
Ash seedling |
| |
Galium aparine |
Common Cleavers |
| |
Heracleum sphondylium |
Hogweed |
|
S |
Knautia arvensis |
Field Scabious |
| |
Linaria vulgaris |
Common toadflax |
| |
Lolium perenne |
Perennial ryegrass |
| |
Lycopus europaeus |
Gipsywort |
| |
Malva sylvestris |
Common mallow |
| |
Matncaria matncanoides |
Pineapple weed |
| |
Polygonum persicaria |
Redshank |
| |
Pulicaria dysenterica |
Common fleabane |
| |
Rubus fructicosus agg |
Bramble |
| |
Scrophularia auriculata |
Water figwort |
| |
Senecio vulgaris |
Groundsel |
| |
Sonus arvensis |
Sowthistle |
| |
Stachys sylvatica |
Hedge woundwort |
| |
Trifolium arvense |
Haresfoot clover |
| |
Ulex europaeus |
Gorse |
| |
Urtica dioica |
Nettle |
S
= Sown species
Table C
Predominant species
| |
1997 |
1998 |
2000 |
2001 |
2002 |
| |
N side |
W side |
N side |
W side |
N side |
W side |
N side |
W side |
N side |
W side |
|
Centaurea nigra |
V (4-5) |
V (4-5) |
V (1-6) |
IV (1-5 |
II (1-3) |
V (1-7) |
III (4-6) |
V (5-8) |
III(1-9) |
V(7-9) |
|
Leucanthemum vulgare |
V (4-8) |
V (3-9) |
V (3-7) |
IV (2-4) |
V (2-8) |
IV (3-5) |
V (4-7) |
V (1-4) |
V (4-9) |
IV( 1-7) |
|
Plantago lanceolata |
V (4-7) |
V (6-8) |
V (5-8) |
IV (5-9) |
V (1-9) |
IV (5-7) |
V (2-7) |
V (1-8) |
V(1-9) |
V(1-8) |
|
Stellaria graminea |
V (2-5) |
V (3-5) |
V (1-5) |
IV (1-5 |
V (1-4) |
III (1) |
II (3-4) |
I (3) |
IV (1-4) |
III (1-5) |
| Agrostis spp. |
V (4-9) |
V(4-10) |
IV(5-7) |
I (4) |
V (8-10) |
V (3-10) |
V (5-9) |
IV (4-9) |
V (4-9) |
V (4-6) |
| Holcus lanatus |
III (1-3) |
II (1-3) |
I (4) |
0 |
V (1-7) |
V (1-9) |
III (1-5) |
V (1-5) |
III (4-7) |
IV (57) |
Table D
Occurrence of sown species
| |
|
1997 |
1998 |
2000 |
2001 |
2002 |
|
Achillea millefolium |
Yarrow |
ü |
ü |
ü |
ü |
ü |
|
Centaurea nigra |
Black knapweed |
ü |
ü |
ü |
ü |
ü |
|
Daucus carota |
Wild carrot |
ü |
ü |
ü |
ü |
ü |
|
Echium vulgare |
Viper’s bugloss |
ü |
x |
x |
x |
x |
|
Galium verum |
Lady’s bedstraw |
ü |
ü |
ü |
ü |
ü |
|
Geranium pratense |
Meadow cranesbill |
ü |
x |
ü |
ü |
ü |
|
Hypericum perforatum |
Perforate St John’s wort |
ü |
ü |
ü |
ü |
ü |
|
Hypochaeris radicata |
Common catsear |
ü |
ü |
ü |
ü |
ü |
|
Knautia arvensis |
Field scabious |
ü |
ü |
ü |
ü |
ü |
|
Leucanthemum vulgare |
Oxeye daisy |
ü |
ü |
ü |
ü |
ü |
|
Lotus corniculatus |
Birds eye trefoil |
ü |
ü |
ü |
ü |
ü |
|
Medicago lupulina |
Black medick |
ü |
ü |
ü |
ü |
ü |
|
Plantago lanceolata |
Ribwort plantain |
ü |
ü |
ü |
ü |
ü |
|
Prunella vulgaris |
Self heal |
ü |
ü |
ü |
ü |
ü |
|
Ranunculus acris |
Meadow buttercup |
x |
x |
ü |
ü |
ü |
|
Rumex acetosa |
Common sorrel |
ü |
ü |
ü |
ü |
ü |
|
Silaum silaus |
Pepper saxifrage |
x |
x |
x |
x |
x |
|
Silene alba |
White campion |
ü |
ü |
ü |
ü |
x |
|
Sanguisorba officinalis |
Great burnet |
x |
x |
x |
x |
x |
|
Stachys officinalis |
Betony |
ü |
ü |
ü |
ü |
ü |
|
Taraxacum officinale agg |
Dandelion |
x |
ü |
ü |
ü |
x |
|
Vicia sativa |
Common vetch |
x |
x |
ü |
ü |
ü |
|
Vicia tetrasperma |
Smooth tare |
ü |
ü |
ü |
ü |
ü |
[Previous Year]
[Previous
Section]
[Contents List]
[Next Section] [Next Year]
CHAPTER 5
REPORT ON BUTTERFLIES FOR 2002
Recorder
Sue Proudley
Butterfly records for 2002 started at the end
of March with 4 Brimstone, 3 Red Admiral, 4 Peacock, and 4 Comma.
April and May looked promising with Brimstone,
Small White, Orange Tip, Peacock and Comma numbers reaching double figures.
It was good to see a better show of Skippers after the dismal records in
2001.
A few Small Copper reappeared in July and
September, but no Purple Hairstreaks were recorded.
A single Painted Lady was seen in June, July
and August and one Clouded Yellow in August.
We can usually expect to see plenty of brown
butterflies from June onward, but these were disappointing with the
exception of the Speckled Wood, which did very well. Low numbers of Small
Tortoiseshell, Common Blue, and Holly Blue were recorded, and also a single
Small Heath.
The last Butterfly recorded was a Red Admiral
on 13th November.
Thank you to all the people who have taken the
trouble to record their observations. Please keep up the good work and
remember to print your name at the bottom of the record sheet so that I can
give you the credit.
The list of species observed on the reserve in
2002 is as follows:
Small Skipper
Essex Skipper
Large Skipper
Brimstone
Large White
Small White
Green-veined White
Orange Tip |
Small Copper
Common Blue
Holly Blue
Red Admiral
Painted Lady
Small Tortoiseshell
Peacock
Comma |
Speckled Wood
Gatekeeper
Meadow Brown
Ringlet
Marbled White
Clouded YellowNumber of species
22 |
The following observers contributed to the
records:
Ken Crick
Chris Rose
Colin Proudley
S Farmer
P Taylor
K B Briggs |
JAB
IHB
RW
RJG
NRG
GH |
JEW
R & JW
AB
AT
JAB
|
Sue Proudley may be contacted on tel: 01252
875536 or
By e-mail: c.proudley(at)btopenworld.com
| |
 |
MOOR GREEN BUTTERFLIES |
 |
|
|
Recorded numbers April -
November 2002 |
MAR |
APR |
MAY |
JUN |
JUL |
AUG |
SEPT |
OCT |
NOV |
|
Small Skipper |
(Thymelicus sylvestris) |
|
|
|
1 |
16 |
|
|
|
|
|
Essex Skipper |
(Thymelicus lineola) |
|
|
|
|
8 |
|
|
|
|
|
Large Skipper |
(Ochiodes venata) |
|
|
|
20 |
28 |
2 |
|
|
|
|
Clouded Yellow |
(Colias crocea) |
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
|
Brimstone |
(Gonepteryx rhamni) |
4 |
10 |
9 |
7 |
2 |
|
|
|
|
|
Large White |
(Pieris brassicae) |
|
6 |
9 |
18 |
23 |
5 |
1 |
|
|
|
Small White |
(Pieris rapae) |
|
19 |
6 |
11 |
6 |
2 |
2 |
|
|
|
Green-veined White |
(Pieris napi) |
|
6 |
6 |
2 |
5 |
3 |
2 |
|
|
|
Orange tip |
(Anthocharis
cardamines) |
|
14 |
20 |
2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Green Hairstreak |
(Callophrys rubi) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purple Hairstreak |
(Quercusia guercus) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Small Copper |
(Lycaena phlaeas) |
|
|
|
|
4 |
|
2 |
|
|
|
Common Blue |
(Polyommatus Icarus) |
|
|
|
6 |
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
Holly Blue |
(Celastrina argiolus) |
|
7 |
1 |
3 |
2 |
1 |
|
|
|
|
Red Admiral |
(Vanessa atalanta) |
3 |
3 |
1 |
6 |
5 |
2 |
2 |
1 |
1 |
|
Painted Lady |
(Cynthia cardui) |
|
|
|
1 |
1 |
1 |
|
|
|
|
Small Tortoiseshell |
(Aglais urticae) |
|
4 |
2 |
1 |
2 |
1 |
2 |
|
|
|
Peacock |
(lnachis io) |
4 |
18 |
3 |
2 |
1 |
3 |
1 |
|
|
|
Comma |
(Polygonia c-album) |
4 |
11 |
1 |
1 |
6 |
|
2 |
|
|
|
Speckled Wood |
(Pararge aegeria) |
|
8 |
6 |
6 |
27 |
30 |
30 |
2 |
|
|
Grayling |
(Hipparchia semele) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gatekeeper |
(Pyonia tithonus) |
|
|
|
|
80 |
10 |
1 |
|
|
|
Meadow Brown |
(Maniola jurtina) |
|
|
|
10 |
85 |
20 |
2 |
|
|
|
Small Heath |
(Coenonympha pamphilus) |
|
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
Ringlet |
(Aphantopus hyperantus) |
|
|
|
32 |
45 |
2 |
|
|
|
[Previous Year]
[Previous
Section]
[Contents List]
[Next Section] [Next
Year]
CHAPTER
6
REPORT ON DRAGONFLIES AND DAMSELFLIES FOR 2002
Ken Crick
The early spring was relatively calm and warm
with Large Red Damselflies showing a couple of miles further down the valley
by the 16th April. However, towards the end of April and into May the
weather was unsettled with low light levels, strong winds and low cloud
cover.
Emergence of many of our early species was
patchy and numbers on the wing were well down on previous years. This
variable weather continued throughout much of the summer. Data from three
separate weeks were lost due to unfavourable weather conditions. Many of my
data sheets for 2002 have statements like "Cloud cover 80% stiff wind from
the SE" and "Full sun to start increasing cloud cover 40 to 100%."
Our Management Plan designates Common Darter,
Common Blue Damselfly and Blue-tailed Damselfly as species indicative of
continuing good management of the reserve’s scrapes and shallows. All three
species showed a marked decline in populations on the wing, with Common
Darter registering 1/5th of normal annual population level and Common Blue
Damselfly being between 1/2 and 1/3 of the annual average. Blue - tailed
Damselfly faired no better, with annual average population level down by 1/2
based on the last five years. The data from the five transects indicate that
the population decline exists across the site as a whole.
River species did well. Banded Demoiselle
figures remained high. Large red Damselfly (that in the main seems to locate
itself on Colebrook Cut), numbers held up well.
It was a bad year for Four-spotted Chaser. The
Black- tailed Skimmer, with an annual population average of 58, this year
only registered 16 specimens. However, this species tends to drift away from
mature sites and Moor Green is now ten years old and maturing.
Brown and Migrant Hawker numbers remained
respectable. Downy Emerald was seen again. In all 18 species put in an
appearance, but 2002 was not a good year. Population fluctuations are
expected year-on-year and indeed the records reflect this.
I offer the following factors as possibly
contributing to this years collapsing populations of the site’s key
monitoring species:-
a) Weather conditions throughout the flight
season were generally unfavourable.
b) The five transects routinely monitored are
becoming overgrown and shaded.
c) Crassula helmsii infests the shallows of
Colebrook Lake North & South.
d) As the site matures some species that
prefer newly created sites will decrease.
e) The draw-down zone was less apparent with
water levels higher than previous years until late into the summer. Larger
fish could hunt right up to the shoreline.
f) Fish populations may be on the increase,
with evidence of large numbers of small pike caught during last year’s
attempted Crassula helmsii removal.
My thanks are extended to those providing
information - they were:-
|
Dr Ian Brown
Mrs. Sue Proudley |
Mrs. Chris Rose
Mr. Jonathan Mist |
Mr. Cohn Proudley
Mr. Alex Twyford |
Mr. John Warren
and GH RJE |
ODONATA
CHECKLIST
DAMSELFLIES Zygoptera
BLUE-TAILED DAMSELFLY Ischnura elegans
This was not a good year for this species.
Compared with the numbers recorded over the previous five years the overall
numbers seen on the wing were down by over a third. The first recorded
sightings were of ten males on the 15th May. There were good numbers present
through-out June, peaking at 66 individuals on the 11th. Copulating pairs
were observed only twice. A final appearance was registered with a single
male on the 27th August.
BANDED DEMOISELLE Caloperyx splendens
This species' iridescent green female
continues to cause identification problems, with some observers claiming
good numbers of emerald damselfly on the river. Banded Demoiselle had a good
year. They were first seen by Cohn Proudley on the 23rd April. There were
two population peaks within the flight season, the first on the 26th May
registering 260 individuals and the second on the 27th August with 103
individuals. The last recorded presence for the season was on the 17th
September. The first population peak was between two to three weeks earlier
than would have been predicted based on the previous five years’ data.
LARGE RED DAMSELFLY Pyrrhosorna nymphala
This species had an average year in population
terms. It was first reported on the 23rd April, again by Cohn Proudley. Its
main haunt is Colebrook Cut in the vicinity of the sluice. The population
peaked with a count of 28 on the 21st May and it was last seen on site on
the 26th June.
EMERALD DAMSELFLY Lestes sponsa
Recorded numbers for this species are always
low. Our best year was in 1999. This year ran it a close second. A total of
eight were seen between the 26th July and the 27th August.
COMMON BLUE DAMSELFLY Enallagama
cyathigerum
The year started with numbers on the wing
comparable with those of 1998 & 2001, remaining this way throughout June.
July heralded a population collapse from which only a minor recovery was
achieved, with numbers typically 1/2 to 1/3 of the previous worst year.
Their presence was first noted on the 15th May. Ninety percent of the 41
seen were in the sexually immature form. The population peak of 576 was
recorded on the 26th June, with a second small peak of 160 on the 2nd
August. The last sighting was outside the survey discipline and was recorded
on the 23rd September, when 2 males were seen.
AZURE DAMSELFLY Coenagrion puellao
Last year (2001) produced the highest
population counts to date and even then the maximum numbers seen on a given
day only reached 6 individuals. This year the survey only recorded five
individuals in total, one on the 26th May, and two on each of the 19th June
and 26th June, all males. John Warren recorded two Azures on site on the
27th July.
RED-EYED DAMSELFLY Eiythromma najas
A single male was first seen on the 15th May.
Ones, twos and threes were seen throughout June. None were seen in July. Four were
recorded on the 16th August, with a final sighting on the 27th August.
DRAGONFLIES Anisoptera
FOUR-SPOTTED CHASER Libellula
quadrimaculata
The weekly survey picked up only three Four-
spotted Chasers, one on the 21st May and two in June. The member of this
species seen by GH on the 19th July was the last recorded sighting for the
season. On our reserve 2002 was a very poor year for this species, the
second worst since 1997.
DOWNY EMERALD Cordulia aenea
This is the third consecutive year this
species has recorded a full life cycle on the reserve. Males were seen over-flying Colebrook Lake
North throughout June and on the 2nd June an exuvia was found in almost the same location,
as in the previous two years. On the 1st June, Alex Twyford recorded 3 Downy Emeralds on
site.
BLACK-TAILED SKIMMER Orthetrum cancellatum
2001 was our best year ever for this species,
with 68 individuals recorded. The site average over the previous four years
is 55. For 2002 the total count for the flight season was only 16, of which
eight were seen on the 11th June, all immature forms. Three exuvia were
found on the 19th June, all in the north west corner of Colebrook Lake
North. The last sighting of this species was recorded by Steve Farmer on the
19th August.
This species is known to favour new sites and
therefore is likely to desert mature ones. The age of our reserve is now
reaching double figures and this may account for the very poor showing this
year.
EMPEROR DRAGONFLY Anax Imperator
Numbers for this species remain low. A female
was seen on the 2nd June and a male on the 26th. The last observation was of an
ovipositing female on the 26th July.
BROWN HAWKER Aeshna grandis
2001 was a poor year for this species at Moor
Green. 2002 showed an increase in the total numbers on the wing, exceeding
those recorded for both 2001 & 2000. The first sighting was on the 13th of
July when 9 were recorded over four of the five prescribed transects. An
ovipositing female was observed over the Grove Lake scrape on the 27th July
during a site visit not associated with the Dragonfly survey work. The final
recorded sighting was of three males on the 8th September.
GOLDEN-RINGED DRAGONFLY Cordulegaster
boltonii
After last year when this species was not
observed over the reserve, a single male was seen twice, once on the 13th
July and the second time three days later.
BROAD-BODIED CHASER Libellula depressa
A rarely-seen visitor to our site. A single
female was observed to the south of Colebrook Lake South, near to the footbridge on the
Blackwater, on the 1st June. This species is known to breed locally on Yateley Common.
MIGRANT HAWKER Aeshna mixta
Not quite the lowest yearly population count
to date. Numbers are down for 2002 by about one-third based on the previous
two years data. This species was on site from the start of August to the end
of September and survey counts on a single day of between 5 and 9
individuals were not uncommon. A copulating pair was only seen on one
occasion.
SOUTHERN HAWKER Aeshna cyanea
First recorded on the reserve on the 2nd
August, they were again observed on three occasions during September.
Coincidentally, each survey resulting in an observation of this species
recorded the sighting of two individuals. Bucking the trend, this year
produced the second highest population count for this species to date.
COMMON HAWKER Aeshna juncea
This not-so-common insect was not seen at all
during the course of any population survey visit.
RUDDY DARTER Sympetrum sanguineum
The six Ruddy-Darter sightings were spread
over the period between 26th July and 23rd September. They were all males. 2000 & 2001
saw relatively high numbers of this species, but 2002’s data more closely resembles the levels
of the late 1990’s.
COMMON DARTER Sympetrum striolatum
The first two teneral-form Common Darters were
observed on the 26th June. They were present throughout July, August &
September, with a final recorded sighting on the 28th October, when two
mating pairs were seen ovipositing in Colebrook Lake North hide scrape.
Ovipositing was witnessed on three further separate occasions in September.
Again this is the poorest year on the reserve for six years, with numbers on
the wing being 1/5 of the annual average over the last five years. The
average number seen on the wing for the last 5 years was 300 individuals,
with only 66 individuals being observed this year.
[Previous Year]
[Previous
Section]
[Contents List]
[Next Section] [Next Year]
CHAPTER
7
SURVEY OF SOLITARY WASPS AND BEES DURING 2002
Martin Mitchell and Steve Farmer.
During
the early summer of 2002 surveys were conducted at Moor Green Lakes on the
number of species of solitary wasps and bees observed at three sites.
Several years ago three small steep sandy banks had been excavated on the
north side of the Colebrook North Lake. These are just below the wooden
fence behind Moor Green Farm close to the shore of the lake. For convenience
these are called the West, Middle and East Banks. In the intervening years
these had become rather overgrown and eroded by grazing cattle. On the Work
Party in February 2002 the vertical faces of the West and Middle Banks were
re-dressed, but the East Bank was not disturbed. Stout wooden posts were
driven in at the corners of each bank to mark the extent of the survey
areas. The West Bank is 4.0 metres long by 1.2 metres wide, the Middle Bank
is 8.0m by 1.3m, and the East Bank is 4.7m by 1.2m. The West and Middle
Banks each include vertical faces about 0.3m high. However the East Bank has
a small sloping area of small flints, another small sloping area of hard
packed sandy soil and several shallow vertical faces below tussocks of
grass. All three Banks face south-south-west and are very well exposed to
midday sunshine. The Banks are well drained and the, vegetation in the
immediate vicinity is short grass and mixed wildflowers.
During June and July surveys were conducted on
5 days. These had two simple objectives. The first was to count the number
of distinct species of solitary wasp and bee observed (without attempting a
full identification). Some of these may have been parasitic wasps. Each
survey lasted between 30 and 60 minutes. The results of the surveys are
given in the table below. On any particular observing day some of the
commoner species could readily be recognised as being present on more than
one of the banks and these are included only once in the overall total.
|
Date |
Weather |
Number of distinct species of solitary
wasps and bees |
|
West |
Middle |
East |
Total |
|
2 June |
mostly cloudy,
sunny intervals. |
|
|
|
2 |
|
18 July |
mostly cloudy, 17C, very light winds. |
2 |
3 |
4 |
6 |
|
19 July |
bright sunshine, cloudless, 20C, light
SE wind |
4 |
2 |
6 |
8 |
|
26 July |
bright sunshine, almost cloudless,
23C,lightWwind |
5 |
5 |
6 |
8 |
|
28 July |
fine, sunny, hot. |
|
|
|
6 |
The second objective was to count the number
of holes which showed recent signs of activity, indicated by small piles of
fine sandy soil below the entrances. Most of these holes were in the open
bare sections of the banks.
|
Date |
Number of holes
showing recent signs of activity |
|
West |
Middle |
East |
Total |
|
19 July |
12 |
10 |
20 |
42 |
|
26 July |
15 |
15 |
30 |
60 |
A survey of the wildflowers in the area
surrounding the Banks on 18th July showed that there were at least 20
different species in bloom. It was clear that some of the wasps and bees
were foraging on these flowers in the immediate vicinity.
In the MGLNR Management Plan, Issue 1,
February 2002 in Section 5.7.2 the criterion for favourable conditions
prevailing on these vertical exposures of bare ground has been specified. It
is deemed to exist if more than two species of mining bee or wasp (from a
specified list of species) are observed to be present. During these surveys,
while it was not possible to identify the different species observed, it
seems clear that the banks are successful. It is also interesting to note
that the East Bank seems to be the most successful with more species present
and more holes occupied. At this Bank the wasp and bee activity was clearly
observed to extend beyond the survey area into the surrounding grassland.
This Bank was not re-dressed during the winter and it may be that the West
and Middle Banks should now be left undisturbed to encourage more species to
return.
[Previous Year]
[Previous
Section]
[Contents List]
[Next Section] [Next Year]
CHAPTER
8
MAMMAL REPORT FOR 2002
Katrina Slocombe
Roe deer
continue to be the most obvious mammal on the Reserve and nearby fields.
Stoats are occasionally seen on the surrounding footpaths, but the Water
Vole, our most endangered mammal, has again been absent from Reserve and
river. This is not unexpected, due to the continued presence of Mink on Long
Island. The anti-mink fence around Tern Island may deter the Mink and
encourage them to go elsewhere for more ‘easy meals’!
Although no small mammal surveys were possible
during the period, it is hoped that populations are being maintained.
Certainly hunting by owls on the site throughout the year would suggest that
they are continuing to source the reserve grasslands for their mammal prey.
The presence of harvest mice is evident from several breeding nests of woven
grasses discovered on work party days.
Steve Bailey is continuing a series of Bat
Surveys throughout the Blackwater Valley and Moor Green Lakes’ results can
be found in the following Chapter.
Surveys and observations will continue in the
coming year and members are encouraged to send all sightings of wild and
feral mammals to Katrina Slocombe, 28 Green Lane, Blackwater, Camberley,
Surrey, GU17 9DH, or pass them to any member of the committee.
[Previous Year]
[Previous
Section]
[Contents List]
[Next Section] [Next Year]
CHAPTER
9
BATS OF MOOR GREEN LAKES
Steve Bailey
Previous Moor Green Lakes Nature Reserve
Annual Reports list 5 species of bat recorded on the Reserve. These records
mainly stem from a few ad hoc reports and a couple of bat walks on the site
organised in the early 1990’s. A detailed report was commissioned as part of
the rolling programme of surveys for the site, the intention being:
-
to assess Moor Green Lakes Nature Reserve
for bat use and bat habitats;
-
to describe a repeatable monitoring
programme and baseline results;
-
to provide recommendations to be
incorporated into the management plan that will maintain and improve the
value of the site for bats.
Two transects have been set up to collect
quantifiable bat data. One of these transects was the length of the River
Blackwater on the edge of the Reserve surveyed for Daubenton’s bats as part
of a national survey. A second transect on Colebrook Lake was established in
2000 and repeated in 2001 to assess use over the lakes. The forty-three bat
boxes erected on site are also monitored annually.
In addition to this, 5 evening visits were
carried out in 2002 to look at bat activity around Grove Lake. These surveys
and the Colebrook Lake transect used an ultrasonic bat detector with time
expansion capability. Bat calls were recorded and later analysed with
computer software that gives the best method of identifying bat species
without actually catching the bats.
The site was found to have a high value for
bats. This high value is due to both foraging on site and also the
strategically important flyways, linking the lakes and river on the valley
floor to the wooded Finchampstead Ridges.
Bats foraged all around the Reserve,
especially the tree-lined river and lake shores. The low fish stocks in the
lakes contrast with the habitat of the stocked angling lakes typical of the
Blackwater Valley and so provide important variety, adding to the overall
value of the Valley. On some nights hundreds of pipistrelles could be seen
feeding over the lakes.
The hedgerows linking the Reserve to the
wooded areas to the north are important and are used by large numbers of
bats of a number of species. Bats are also commuting onto the Reserve along
the River and from the south via the tree lined lakes and hedgerows / wooded
areas.
No natural roost sites were located on the
Reserve, where there are relatively few dead or large mature trees. Probably
bats using the Reserve are roosting in nearby houses or trees in the wooded
area of Finchampstead Ridges. However, 1 male and 2 female
55 kHz pipistrelles were found in a box sited
in the western hedge in September 2002, the first evidence that the boxes
are being used.
Four species of bats were observed foraging
over the Reserve most evenings and 2 further species were confirmed on site.
The 55 kHz pipistrelle (Pipistrellus
pygmaeus) was the most numerous bat recorded on the Colebrook Lake
transect in both years (50% of all bats recorded in 2000 and 39% in 2001).
The 45 kHz pipistrelle (Pipistrellus pipistrellus) ranked second with
28% in 2000 and 33% in 2001.
This difference may reflect where the transect
was located. The 2001 survey indicated that the 55 kHz pipistrelle favoured
the tree lined edges of Colebrook South / river corridor, but did move out
over the open Colebrook Lake North in June & July to feed on swarms of
Caenis Mayfly. The 2002 surveys also found the 45 kHz pipistrelles were more
numerous around the lake edges and scrub areas, whereas the 55 kHz
pipistrelles were more numerous commuting down the hedgerows and foraging
along the river.
Daubenton’s (Myotis daubentonii) bat
was the third species of bat that was observed foraging on the Reserve most
nights. This species is closely associated with water and is known for its
habit of foraging just above the surface of ponds and rivers, which makes it
easily visible. Numbers were much lower than the pipistrelles, but, like the
pipistrelles, numbers varied from evening to evening, as did the centre of
activity. On some evenings the river was well used, on other nights activity
was mostly over the lakes. It is likely that during favourable evenings
20-50 Daubenton’s were foraging over the Reserve.
The fourth species that was regular
encountered was the Noctule (Nyctalus noctula). Activity was low in
the early part of each year, but increased in late May and June. Numbers
were lower at Moor Green than the other gravel pits studied in the Valley to
the south and they arrived later at Moor Green, suggesting that the Reserve
may be at the northern edge of a colony’s territory.
On some nights foraging activity is minimal,
with bats visiting the Reserve but not stopping. On other nights, especially
in mid summer, 1-5 Noctules forage over the Reserve and adjacent lakes.
Although a comparatively small number, the Reserve is playing an important
role in supporting a colony of this declining species.
Brown Long-eared bats (Plecotus auritus)
are included on the species list published in the Annual Reports. This is
believed to originate from a single record of unknown accuracy from a bat
walk prior to 1990. They use very quiet calls and so are rarely recorded by
echolocation surveys.
Three time-expansion recordings on 27th June
2002 in the car park were confirmed as this species. The bats are almost
certainly more common on the site than this one evening’s recordings
suggest. It is probable that a colony (usually 10-30 bats) based in the
Finchampstead Ridges woodland is using the Reserve as part of its foraging
territory.
Mixed in with the Long-eared bats were at
least two bats that were almost certainly Natterer’s (Myotis nattereri).
This survey was just 3 days after recording Natterer’s bat in the
Finchampstead Ridges woodland, indicating that a local maternity colony is
using the Reserve as part of its territory.
The Natterer’s bat has its international
stronghold in southern Britain. Foraging areas include woodlands, wet
woodlands and watersides with high tree cover. One of Europe’s major
hibernation and swarming sites for this species occurs at Greywell Tunnel.
This is well within an evening’s flight range of the Natterer’s bats at Moor
Green.
The pipistrelle is a national BAP priority
species. Other bat species have probably declined to an equal extent and are
equally deserving of conservation measures: Noctules and Natterer’s fall
into this category. (Noctules are included in the Bracknell Forest local BAP
whilst Wokingham’s BAP includes all bat species).
Because of the site’s high value for bats,
there is a need to balance the requirements of the Reserve’s bat population
with its other specialities. In general bats benefit from trees and water,
as. these provide rich sources of insects and, in the case of woodland, also
provide cover and roost sites. Management that aims to increase tree cover
and maintain the hedgerows and tree belts that act as flyways is a priority.
Cattle grazing should continue as the preferred way of maintaining the areas
of rough scrubby grassland, as permanent pasture and dung are a rich source
of insects. The increasing diversity of the aquatic and marginal flora will
be beneficial to bats, as this also leads to a diverse insect fauna.
For people interested in birds the Reserve may
appear quiet and lifeless at night, but it is only a change of shift. With
the maturing of the site and minor change to management practices the value
of the Reserve for bats should continue to slowly increase. It will be
interesting to see the results of any repeated monitoring surveys in 5
years’ time.
[Previous Year]
[Previous
Section]
[Contents List]
[Next Section] [Next Year]
CHAPTER 10
HEDGEROW SURVEY 29TH MAY 2002
Irene
Draper and Ken Crick
This survey constituted one of those planned
for 2002 (Management Plan Objective 5.5d). The survey was executed on a date
that was almost too late in the season as ground-cover plants are not so
easily found beneath the early summer flush of grasses and nettles. Many
hedgerow surveys are seeking ancient woodland indicator plants in the ground
flora. Our hedge was known to have been planted approximately 10 years ago,
so the presence or otherwise of ancient woodland indicator plants was not
considered to be significant.
The survey was conducted in line with the
method taught on the B.B. & 0. Wildlife Trust course. Mrs. Irene Draper, a
Group member with knowledge of plants acquired over many years, provided the
botanical input. Ken Crick attended the hedgerow-surveying course and
assisted with method and data recording.
The survey was carried out on the hedge that
runs from the car park at Lower Sandhurst Road (Map ref. SU 805,626) to the
River Blackwater. The hedge forms the western-most boundary along which
conservation activities take place. The whole length of the hedge was
surveyed using a 30-metre line to define each of the 20 survey bays. The
height and width of the hedge was assessed using a one metre measuring
stick. The record sheets reproduced here were adapted from those used on the
course and developed by Dick Greenaway for the Ashampstead Parish,
Berkshire, Hedgerow Survey.
The majority of the hedge is overgrown; it
contains seven species of standard single trunk trees. The hedge itself is
made up of 10 species of shrub. There are a number of large gaps in the
hedge. Just how intentional these were in the original planting is not
known. Forty-one species of ground flora were recorded as present.
The hedgerow supplement of the first
Management Plan, produced at the time the Reserve was created, listed six
species of cuttings and transplants to be used. They were oak, ash, silver
birch, hawthorn, alder and blackthorn. Five of these are present in the
current hedge. The absence of alder may indicate that it was not planted in
the hedge, as it does grow elsewhere on site.
Three bays (16,17 & 18) have been laid. The
ground adjacent to bays 19 & 20 is particularly shaded and remains damp for
long periods. It is suggested that these two bays be scheduled next for
laying.
|
BAY(30m) |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
7 |
8 |
9 |
10 |
|
Average height (m) |
0 |
0 |
0 |
5 |
2.5 |
3.5 |
4 PLUS |
4 PLUS |
3.5 |
3.5 |
|
Average width (m) |
0 |
0 |
0 |
2.5 |
2.5 |
2.75 |
2.5 |
2.5 |
2.5 |
2.5 |
|
Condition |
0 |
0 |
0 |
Og |
Og |
Og |
Og |
Og |
Og |
Og |
|
Gaps (% of Bay) |
99% |
99% |
100% |
30% |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
10% |
|
Rabbit holes |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
Og
- Overgrown
Standard Trees
St = Stool M = Multi-stem S =
Single
|
Elm |
S |
S |
S |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Oak |
|
|
|
S |
|
|
S |
S |
|
|
|
Wild Pear |
|
|
|
S |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ash |
|
|
|
S |
|
|
S |
|
|
|
|
Silver Birch |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
S |
|
Field Maple |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Hornbeam |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Bramble |
|
X |
X |
|
|
X |
X |
X |
|
|
| Hawthorne |
|
|
|
X |
X |
X |
X |
X |
X |
X |
| Blackthorn |
|
|
|
X |
X |
X |
X |
X |
X |
X |
|
Field Maple |
|
|
|
|
X |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Damson |
|
|
|
|
|
X |
|
|
|
|
|
Oak |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Wild Pear |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Elder |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Birch |
|
|
|
|
|
X |
|
|
|
|
|
BAY(30m) |
11 |
12 |
13 |
14 |
15 |
16 |
17 |
18 |
19 |
20 |
|
Average height (m) |
3 |
2 |
4 |
4 |
3 |
3 |
2 |
1.5 |
4 PLUS |
4 PLUS |
|
Average width (m) |
2 |
2 |
0 |
1.5 |
1.5 |
1.5 |
1.5 |
1 |
1.5 |
1.5 |
|
Condition |
Og |
Og |
R |
Og |
Og |
L |
L |
L |
Og |
Og |
|
Gaps (% of Bay) |
3% |
5% |
99% |
3% |
25% |
2% |
2% |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
Rabbit holes |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
Og
- Overgrown
Standard Trees
St = Stool M = Multi-stem S =
Single
|
Elm |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Oak |
|
|
|
|
|
|
S |
|
|
|
|
Wild Pear |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ash |
|
|
|
|
|
s |
S |
|
s |
|
|
Silver Birch |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Field Maple |
|
|
|
s |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Hornbeam |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
S |
| Bramble |
x |
X |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Hawthorne |
x |
x |
x |
X |
X |
X |
X |
X |
X |
X |
| Blackthorn |
x |
x |
|
X |
X |
X |
X |
X |
X |
X |
|
Field Maple |
x |
x |
|
|
X |
x |
|
|
|
x |
|
Damson |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Oak |
x |
x |
|
|
|
|
x |
|
|
|
| Wild Pear |
|
|
|
x |
x |
|
|
|
|
x |
| Elder |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
x |
|
| Birch |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
BAY(30m) |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
7 |
8 |
9 |
10 |
|
Grasses |
X |
X |
X |
X |
X |
X |
X |
X |
X |
X |
|
Nettle |
X |
X |
X |
X |
|
|
X |
X |
X |
X |
|
Goose Grass |
X |
|
X |
X |
X |
X |
X |
X |
X |
X |
|
Lesser Stitchwort |
X |
|
|
|
X |
|
|
|
|
X |
|
Willowherb Small |
|
|
|
|
X |
|
|
|
|
X |
|
Creeping Thistle |
|
|
|
|
X |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Scentless Mayweed |
|
|
|
|
X |
|
|
|
X |
|
|
Cut-leaved Cranesbill |
X |
X |
X |
|
|
|
X |
X |
|
X |
|
Yarrow |
X |
|
X |
X |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common Chickweed |
X |
|
|
|
|
|
|
X |
X |
X |
|
Upright Hedge Parsley |
X |
X |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
X |
|
Rib-leaved Plantain |
|
X |
X |
X |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dock |
|
X |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dandelion |
|
X |
X |
X |
|
X |
X |
X |
|
|
|
Mash Thistle |
|
X |
|
X |
|
|
|
|
|
X |
|
Mugwort |
|
X |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Woody Nightshade |
|
X |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mallow |
|
X |
X |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Greater Stitchwort |
|
|
|
|
X |
X |
|
X |
|
X |
|
Round-leaved Plantain |
|
X |
X |
X |
X |
X |
X |
X |
X |
X |
|
Common Vetch |
|
|
|
X |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Hogweed |
|
|
X |
X |
|
|
|
|
|
X |
|
Thyme-leaved Speedwell |
|
|
|
X |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rough Hawksbeard |
|
|
|
X |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Garlic Mustard |
|
|
|
|
|
X |
X |
X |
|
|
|
Cow Parsley |
|
|
|
|
|
X |
|
X |
X |
|
|
Hemlock |
|
|
|
|
|
X |
|
|
|
|
|
Spear Thistle |
|
|
|
|
|
X |
|
|
|
|
|
White Bryony |
|
|
|
|
|
X |
X |
|
X |
|
|
Herb Bennet |
|
|
|
|
|
|
X |
|
|
|
|
Hop |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
X |
|
|
BAY(30m) |
11 |
12 |
13 |
14 |
15 |
16 |
17 |
18 |
19 |
20 |
|
Grasses |
X |
X |
X |
X |
X |
X |
X |
X |
X |
X |
|
Nettle |
|
|
X |
X |
X |
X |
X |
X |
X |
X |
|
Goose Grass |
X |
X |
X |
X |
X |
X |
X |
X |
X |
X |
|
Lesser Stitchwort |
|
|
|
X |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Cut-leaved Cranesbill
|
X |
X |
X |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rib-leaved Plantain |
|
X |
|
|
|
|
X |
|
|
|
|
Broad-leaved Dock |
|
|
X |
X |
X |
X |
|
|
X |
|
|
Dandelion |
X |
X |
|
|
|
X |
X |
|
|
|
|
Mash Thistle |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mugwort |
|
X |
X |
|
X |
X |
|
X |
X |
X |
|
Woody Nightshade |
|
|
|
|
|
|
X |
|
|
|
|
Greater Stitchwort |
X |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Round-leaved Plantain |
X |
X |
X |
X |
|
X |
X |
|
|
|
|
Common Vetch |
|
|
|
|
|
|
X |
|
X |
|
|
Hogweed |
|
|
|
X |
X |
X |
X |
X |
X |
X |
|
Thyme-leaved Speedwell |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rough Hawksbeard |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cow Parsley |
|
|
X |
X |
|
X |
X |
X |
X |
|
|
Hemlock |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Spear Thistle |
|
|
|
|
|
|
X |
|
X |
|
|
Meadow Cranesbill |
X |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ivy |
|
X |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
White Deadnettle |
|
X |
|
|
|
|
|
X |
|
|
|
Creeping Buttercup |
|
|
X |
X |
X |
X |
X |
X |
|
X |
|
Narrow Leaved Doc |
|
|
X |
|
|
|
|
|
X |
|
|
Creeping Thistle |
|
|
X |
|
|
|
|
|
X |
|
|
Nipplewort |
|
|
|
|
X |
|
|
|
X |
X |
|
Upright Hedge Parsley |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
X |
[Previous Year]
[Previous
Section]
[Contents List]
[Next Section] [Next Year]
CHAPTER 11
REPTILE REPORT FOR 2002
Peter Scott
Reptile recording on site has two components:
-
regular inspections of corrugated iron
sheets (and their surroundings) in two areas:
a) five sheets within 50 metres of the
hibernaculum near Colebrook Lake North;
b) five sheets spread along a 200-metre
section of the north shore of Grove Lake;
-
casual reports of sightings anywhere on the
reserve.
Regular inspections
Eleven sheet-inspection visits were made
between mid-May and mid-October. On three of these visits only half the tins
(those near the hibernaculum) were inspected. Spring visits found no
reptiles, but from July onwards most visits were rewarded with at least one
sighting. All the animals seen were grass snakes (Natrix natrix) or
their moulted skins. The overall results are summarised in the following
table:
Summary of surveys of reptile basking tins:
2002
|
Site visits made
Total tin-inspections
Total grass snakes (or skins) seen
Sightings per tin-inspection |
11
93
6
0.06 |
All the snakes seen were under or close to the
tins near the hibernaculum. None were found at the tins along the shore of
Grove Lake. However, the small amount of data means that this does not
necessarily reflect a real variation in snake distribution.
Casual reports
Seven reptile sightings were reported. Six of
these were of grass snakes (or their skins), two around Grove Lake and four
around Colebrook. The seventh report was of three Adders (Vipera berus)
in a pile of Crassula that had been removed from the scrape by Colebrook
hide.
Reptiles released on site
A local herpetologist, Gareth Matthes,
released seven grass snakes (rescued from a development site in Mytchett)
near the hibernaculum during August and September. For this reason alone, a
subsequent increase in sightings might be expected.
Summary
Clearly the data collected cannot give a
reliable picture of reptile populations on site. Rather, they are intended
to form a basis from which some indication of trends might be derived. The
results are probably as interesting for what is missing as much as for what
was found. In particular, there were no sightings of either slow worms or
common lizards, though it seems unlikely that both are completely absent.
[Previous Year]
[Previous
Section]
[Contents List]
[Next Section] [Next Year]
CHAPTER 12
REPORT ON REED BED PROJECT FOR 2002
Steve
Farmer
The extraction of gravel from the Manor Farm
site, immediately to the west of the Moor Green Lakes Nature Reserve, has
continued throughout the year. Gravel extraction and site restoration will
take about ten years. In August 2002 RMC Aggregates (Southern) Ltd released
revised plans for the proposed restoration of the site. It is envisaged that
part of the site will be restored as a nature reserve and part as amenity
land.
Under these proposals it is expected that:
-
the Colebrook Cut will be restored but in a
slightly different position;
-
extra trees will be planted along the north
side of the site to supplement existing plantings;
-
there will be three managed reed beds;
-
a small lake with reedy margins will feed
water into the upper reed bed;
-
water will be drawn from Colebrook Cut to
feed the other two large reed beds;
-
there will be a large lake with reedy
margins on the south side of the site;
-
three viewing mounds will be provided at
strategic points to allow bird watchers to observe the reed beds and the
main lake;
-
the western end of the site will be restored
mainly as grassland with a small pond.
A small pilot project was set up in 2001 to
investigate methods of reed propagation for the reed beds. During 2002 the
germination trials of the common reed (Phragmites australis), which
were started in December 2001, were completed. The final test using reed
seed collected late in the winter from two local sources (Colebrook Cut and
one of the Watersports Lakes) produced very poor germination rates. This
confirmed earlier findings that the best results are obtained with seed
obtained from large reed beds. Unfortunately the setting up of the pilot
reed bed has been delayed. It may be made available when the restoration of
part of the Manor Farm site starts. In the interim small numbers of reed
seedlings (grown from seed collected at Fleet Pond and Lakeside Park) were
planted on a small island in the Grove scrape. This was adequate for the
initial trials. Unfortunately these seedlings were immediately grazed by
Canada Geese. This was a very salutary lesson, but clearly demonstrates the
need for adequate protection of newly planted reed seedlings. Some
protection was then provided by surrounding the seedlings with bushy sticks,
but this was a classic case of shutting the stable door after the horse had
bolted. By the early autumn the remaining seedlings had recovered well. It
is expected that these seedlings will take about three years to become fully
established.
In May a small propagation trial using stem
cuttings proved to be a failure. Only 2 out of 12 cuttings started to grow
and then collapsed. This method has been reported from other sites as being
capable of producing a success rate of up to 40% for cuttings taken early in
the growing season.
In June another test of propagation by
division of rhizomes proved to be much more successful with a high rate of
success. This method could be used for raising small numbers of plants, but
it is too labour intensive to produce the
large number of plants required for a whole reed bed. A small number of
plants were planted out at the north east corner of Grove Lake.
It has not been possible to test propagation
by broadcasting seed in the open as no suitable site has been available for
this trial.
[Previous Year]
[Previous
Section]
[Contents List]
[Next Section] [Next Year]
CHAPTER 13
HABITAT SURVEY 2002
Steve
Farmer
The need for a Habitat Survey of the Moor
Green Lakes Nature Reserve became apparent at about the time that the
Management Plan was being drafted during winter 2000/2001. At that time the
only map available of the distribution of vegetation on the Reserve was the
original Planting Plan (dated 1989). It was therefore considered necessary
that a survey should be undertaken and that maps should be produced.
The initial survey work was done during the
winter 2000/2001. This survey provided the approximate extent and relative
positions of the major habitat types which existed on the Reserve at that
time. No great claims are made for the absolute accuracy of this survey as
it was heavily dependent on visual estimates of distances and position.
However it is thought that the positions of most of the major features are
accurate to about ± 10 metres. The relative positions of adjacent features
are accurate to about 5 metres.
Four maps were produced at the conclusion of
the initial survey. These were maps of the whole Reserve (at a scale of
approximately 1:5000) and three separate maps for each individual lake (at a
scale of approximately 1:2500). These were included in the Management Plan,
Issue 1, February 2002. Each 100 x 100 metre square was given a unique
“compartment number” and this has been used as a quick and easy reference
number for locating features mentioned in the Management Plan. These
original maps were produced with the Windows Paint software package. This is
not a dedicated mapping package and there were severe restrictions on the
production, correction, modification and labelling of the resultant maps.
It was recognised that the original maps had
several shortcomings. During winter 2001/2002 the Reserve was resurveyed.
Some features which had been omitted originally were now included, such as
the copses of trees on the north side of Colebrook North and Grove Lakes and
some of the bird scrapes on Long Island. The extent of the wildflower meadow
and the area covered by rough grass and rushes were reassessed. Internal
fences and the main patches of bramble, gorse and bracken were added. The
new viewing slots cut during the winter 2001/2002 were included. The
positions of the few mature trees which actually grow on the Reserve, and,
more importantly, the many mature trees which grow along the north and west
boundaries or just outside the Reserve were added. These form an important
backdrop for the Reserve. Many are used for siting bird boxes and bat boxes.
New features such as the reptile hibernaculum and the anti-mink fence on
Tern Island were included. The maps were then plotted using a dedicated
software-mapping program called Mapmaker Pro 2.4. This provided much greater
freedom in the production and labelling of the resultant maps.
Since then the maps have been revised to
include recent changes on the Reserve. During the autumn 2002 an area of
birch saplings at the east end of Colebrook South was cut down and 10 new
viewing slots were cut. The present maps reflect the state of the Reserve in
December 2002. These habitat maps will be included in the first annual
review of the Management Plan, due to be started in April 2003. [The
Overview habitat map is included in
Appendix J]
[Previous
Year]
[Previous
Section]
[Contents List]
[Next Section] [Next Year]
CHAPTER 14
NEST BOXES 2002
Dr
Kevin Briggs
The breeding season was early for most species
after a period of good weather in February and March. Occupancy was high at
94% with only three boxes not occupied. Tawny and Little Owl did not use the
boxes, but did breed on the Reserve in natural sites. Blue Tit, Great Tit,
Mandarin and Stock Dove all increased their occupancy of boxes.
1) Great Tit
Seventeen pairs laid eggs in the boxes, but
two pairs deserted after laying 4 and 2 eggs respectively because of Great
Spotted Woodpecker damage. The first eggs of 4 clutches were laid on 2
April. The mean day was 6 April (sd 3.3 days) The mean clutch size was 7.8 (sd
1.7) eggs and mean brood at hatching was 6.9 (sd 2.0) young (104 young from
118 eggs). Unfortunately bad weather in late May did affect the survival of
many young birds and brood size of fledglings averaged 5.3 (sd 2.4) young.
This gives a total of 80 young produced or 4.7 (sd 2.9) young per nesting
attempt.
2) Blue Tit
Five pairs chose to use nest boxes rather than
Bat boxes this year. Two of the pairs deserted after laying 4 and 2 eggs.
One pair laid the first egg on 1 April, but the average laying date was 6
April (sd 4.3 days). For the remaining three clutches (mean 11.3, sd 2.3
eggs) hatching success was excellent with 11.0 (sd 2.6) young. The final
brood size was good at 11.0 (sd 2.6) young per nest, giving 33 young from
the total five nesting attempts or 6.6 (sd 6.3) young per pair attempting to
nest.
3) Stock Dove
Four pairs mated successfully, laying the
first clutch on 9 April (sd 1.9) with 2 eggs in each clutch. The success of
these first broods was high with 6 young being fledged. Two pairs suffered
intrusions from egg-laying Mandarin ducks, but raised young regardless.
4) Mandarin Duck
The timing of breeding (laying of the first
egg) was difficult to identify this year with brood parasitism and egg
dumping being high, but it was probably 16 April (sd 11.5) with the first
egg on 1 April and the last full clutch attempted 30 April.
Large clutches of 26 and 18 eggs were found
and probably related to 3 and 2 females using the same nest box; Three other
eggs were laid in nest boxes occupied by breeding Stock Doves. Four other
females laid clutches of 10 eggs (3 birds) and 8 eggs. One of these was
deserted after Grey Squirrels usurped the box. What is most surprising is
that a single female incubated the clutch of 26 eggs and hatched 23 young
with 20 of them successfully leaving the box; similarly the clutch of 18
hatched 16 young. There were 85 eggs laid, probably by 9 females, possibly
10, with 64 hatching and 61 ducklings leaving the nest. This is the highest
rate of occupancy for this species on the Reserve (it was 6 in 1997).
5) Hornet
One nest box was used, this after the Mandarin
brood had hatched
[Previous Year]
[Previous
Section]
[Contents List]
[Next Section] [Next Year]
APPENDIX A
PROFILE
OF THE RESERVE
The
Moor Green Lakes Reserve lies partly within the area administered by
Wokingham District Council and partly within the Borough of Bracknell
Forest. The River Blackwater, which forms the boundary between the counties
of Berkshire and Hampshire runs close to the southern boundary of the
Reserve. To the north is Finchampstead Ridges, an area administered by the
National Trust. A map of the Reserve appears at
Appendix J.
The Reserve covers an area of approximately 36
hectares (90 acres), the majority of which lies within the flood plain of
the River Blackwater. It contains three lakes formed out of flooded gravel
pits which are bordered by areas of grassland, planted coppice and
wildflower meadow. Two of the lakes, Colebrook Lake North and Colebrook Lake
South, are separated by an elongated island through the centre of which runs
the old water course of the Colebrook Cut. The third lake, Grove Lake, lies
immediately to the east separated by a narrow strip of land. Within the
lakes are several gravel-capped islands and gravel beaches.
An important feature of the Reserve is the
presence of sluices, at the exit of the Colebrook Cut and from Colebrook
Lake into the River Blackwater, which allow the level of the water in
Colebrook Lakes North and South to be controlled within certain limits. By
this method, muddy margins can be exposed ahead of the main spring and
autumn passage of wading birds.
Overall management of the Reserve is under the
control of a Steering Group comprised of representatives of RMC Aggregates
(Southern) Ltd., Blackwater Valley Countryside Service and the Moor Green
Lakes Group. Practical day to day management and the collection, recording,
assessment and dissemination of information about the Reserve is undertaken
by the Moor Green Lakes. Group, which was established in 1993. The group
committee members are listed in Appendix H. The necessary costs of the Group
not covered by membership subscriptions are met by RMC. Membership is open
to all with an interest in the reserve, its wildlife and its management,
Public access to the Reserve is restricted to
the viewing hides provided by RMC which overlook respectively Colebrook Lake
North and Grove Lake (see map at Appendix H). Unfortunately vandalism has
meant that the hides cannot be left permanently open, but members of the
public may use the hides whenever they are in use by members of the group
(who have access at any time). The Colebrook Lake hide incorporates a
viewing window for observers in wheelchairs. When the hides are locked,
views over the scrapes adjacent to the hides can be obtained from the
screened viewing points alongside the hides. Views across the Reserve can
also be obtained from viewing points along the footpath, which runs along
the western and southern sides of the Reserve.
The main access to the Reserve is from Lower
Sandhurst Road where a car park has been provided (Ordnance Survey grid
reference SU805628). The shortest access to the Grove Lake hide is from the
Rambler’s Car Park at the entrance to the Horseshoe Lake Water Sports Centre
off Mill Lane (grid reference SU820620).
[Previous Year]
[Previous
Section]
[Contents List]
[Next Section] [Next Year]
APPENDIX B
EVERSLEY GRAVEL PITS (INC. MOOR GREEN LAKES
RESERVE)
ANNUAL BIRD REPORT 2002
Dr. Ian Brown
LITTLE GREBE
Resident and winter visitor. During the
breeding season five pairs were present rearing a total of 2 young. A maxima
of 22 were recorded on Aug.24th.
Monthly maxima:
|
Jan |
Feb |
Mar |
Apr |
May |
Jun |
Jul |
Aug |
Sep |
Oct |
Nov |
Dec |
|
3 |
8 |
10 |
1 |
4 |
5 |
5 |
22 |
17 |
8 |
7 |
5 |
GREAT CRESTED GREBE
Common resident. A maxima of 25 were recorded
on Nov. 18th. A total of four pairs were present during the summer, one pair
successfully rearing a total of 2 young.
Monthly maxima:
|
Jan |
Feb |
Mar |
Apr |
May |
Jun |
Jul |
Aug |
Sep |
Oct |
Nov |
Dec |
|
10 |
9 |
10 |
6 |
10 |
8 |
8 |
8 |
8 |
19 |
25 |
23 |
CORMORANT
Common winter visitor that oversummers in
small numbers. Recorded in all months with a maximum count of 34 on Mar. 5th
Monthly maxima:
|
Jan |
Feb |
Mar |
Apr |
May |
Jun |
Jul |
Aug |
Sep |
Oct |
Nov |
Dec |
|
29 |
32 |
34 |
3 |
6 |
5 |
6 |
13 |
9 |
32 |
7 |
29 |
BITTERN
Rare visitor. One was seen in the phragmites
behind Colebrook hide on Feb.10 (m.o) and presumably the same bird was seen
again by Grove on Feb.21st (SFGF). These constitute only the third and
fourth site records, the last being in 1997.
LITTLE EGRET
Scarce visitor. Two records; One on Apr.20th
(AF, TJC) and one on Dec. 16th 17th (BH, JW, RW). Recorded in four of the
last five years reflecting the increased numbers in southern England.
GREY HERON
Common resident.
Monthly maxima:
|
Jan |
Feb |
Mar |
Apr |
May |
Jun |
Jul |
Aug |
Sep |
Oct |
Nov |
Dec |
|
6 |
3 |
6 |
2 |
4 |
2 |
2 |
5 |
7 |
4 |
4 |
6 |
MUTE SWAN
Common resident and winter visitor. One pair
bred rearing 4 young.
Monthly maxima:
|
Jan |
Feb |
Mar |
Apr |
May |
Jun |
Jul |
Aug |
Sep |
Oct |
Nov |
Dec |
|
26 |
19 |
7 |
6 |
8 |
15 |
15 |
22 |
32 |
20 |
47 |
31 |
GREYLAG GOOSE
Regular visitor. Recorded between Jan. 19th
and Sept. 14th with a maximum of three on May 6th.
SNOW GOOSE
Common resident, with birds from the nearby
free flying flock regularly visiting the site. In the early and late winter
periods up to 17 and 15 birds were present respectively. Although birds were
present on the site in summer there was no evidence of breeding.
CANADA GOOSE
Abundant resident.
Monthly maxima:
|
Jan |
Feb |
Mar |
Apr |
May |
Jun |
Jul |
Aug |
Sep |
Oct |
Nov |
Dec |
|
93 |
118 |
72 |
50 |
60 |
135 |
- |
- |
250 |
33 |
104 |
157 |
BARNACLE GOOSE
Very common resident. Seven pairs attempted to
breed but no young survived due to predation.
Monthly maxima:
|
Jan |
Feb |
Mar |
Apr |
May |
Jun |
Jul |
Aug |
Sep |
Oct |
Nov |
Dec |
|
224 |
240 |
237 |
15 |
32 |
100 |
20 |
71 |
140 |
184 |
201 |
197 |
BRENT GOOSE
Rare visitor. One was present on Nov.17th (GR
et al). This is only the second site record, the first was in 1984.
EGYPTIAN GOOSE
Regular visitor. A very good year with up to
nine birds recorded between Feb. 16th and Dec.9th. One pair was present
throughout May but breeding was not suspected.
SHELDUCK
Regular visitor. Recorded as follows: 3,
Apr.21st, and 1, Sept. 14-15th.
MANDARIN
Summer visitor in increasing numbers,
irregular in winter. Recorded in all months except October. Breeding birds
recorded from Mar.3rd. Bred successfully in nest boxes. The maximum count
was of 15 on Nov.30th (IHB) a site record.
WIGEON Very common winter visitor. Birds were recorded up to Mar.3Oth
and from Aug.24th. The maximum count was of 443 on Feb.2nd.
Monthly maxima:
|
Jan |
Feb |
Mar |
Apr |
May |
Jun |
Jul |
Aug |
Sep |
Oct |
Nov |
Dec |
|
207 |
443 |
218 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
5 |
77 |
146 |
244 |
396 |
GADWALL
Common winter visitor that oversummers. Seven
males oversummered with up to two females both of which bred successfully
rearing two broods totalling 15 young. This is the first (and long overdue!)
confirmed breeding on the site and reserve. The count of 182 on Oct.27th
(IT) was a site record count.
Monthly maxima:
|
Jan |
Feb |
Mar |
Apr |
May |
Jun |
Jul |
Aug |
Sep |
Oct |
Nov |
Dec |
|
98 |
39 |
32 |
7 |
9 |
7 |
0 |
22 |
24 |
182 |
115 |
108 |
TEAL
Common winter visitor that occasionally
summers. 1/2 birds were present irregularly through the summer but breeding
was not suspected. Recorded in all months. The maximum count was 56 on
Dec.22nd.
Monthly maxima:
|
Jan |
Feb |
Mar |
Apr |
May |
Jun |
Jul |
Aug |
Sep |
Oct |
Nov |
Dec |
|
23 |
53 |
40 |
6 |
6 |
1 |
1 |
7 |
19 |
25 |
34 |
56 |
GREEN WINGED TEAL
Very rare visitor. The male present from Nov.
17th 2001 remained until Jan.27th (IHB et al).
MALLARD
Common resident and winter visitor. Numbers
may be declining.
Monthly maxima:
|
Jan |
Feb |
Mar |
Apr |
May |
Jun |
Jul |
Aug |
Sep |
Oct |
Nov |
Dec |
|
21 |
27 |
23 |
18 |
25 |
- |
70 |
35 |
52 |
- |
53 |
62 |
PINTAIL Uncommon but regular visitor.
Two records: One female on Feb.2nd (CJ) and six (4 males) on Dec.28th (JH)
GARGANEY
Rare visitor. A male on Horseshoe lake on Apr.
16th (KBB) was only the second site record, the first was in 1994 found by
the same observer!
SHOVELER
Common winter visitor. Recorded until Apr. 6th
and from Jun. 2nd. A site record count of 54 was present on Feb.9th (IHB).
Monthly maxima:
|
Jan |
Feb |
Mar |
Apr |
May |
Jun |
Jul |
Aug |
Sep |
Oct |
Nov |
Dec |
|
40 |
54* |
28 |
2 |
0 |
3 |
2 |
3 |
8 |
13 |
18 |
18 |
POCHARD
Common winter visitor, irregular in summer.
The maximum was 79 on Dec.28th.
Monthly maxima:
|
Jan |
Feb |
Mar |
Apr |
May |
Jun |
Jul |
Aug |
Sep |
Oct |
Nov |
Dec |
|
31 |
68 |
30 |
1 |
4 |
0 |
1 |
2 |
9 |
21 |
39 |
79 |
TUFTED DUCK
Abundant resident and winter visitor. During
the summer three broods totalling 12 young were raised. Winter numbers
peaked at 157 on Dec.28th.
Monthly maxima:
|
Jan |
Feb |
Mar |
Apr |
May |
Jun |
Jul |
Aug |
Sep |
Oct |
Nov |
Dec |
|
70 |
118 |
142 |
54 |
48 |
32 |
22 |
40 |
35 |
50 |
111 |
157 |
COMMON SCOTER
Infrequent visitor. The only record was of a
female on Apr.2nd (GR et al). This was the first record since 1998.
GOLDENEYE
Winter visitor in increasing numbers. In the
early year birds were recorded until Apr. 16th. First returns were from
Oct.23rd.
Monthly maxima:
|
Jan |
Feb |
Mar |
Apr |
May |
Jun |
Jul |
Aug |
Sep |
Oct |
Nov |
Dec |
|
8 |
5 |
6 |
2 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
5 |
5 |
GOOSANDER
Common winter visitor. Numbers were generally
down although the roost was covered as thoroughly as in recent years. The
last early year record was on the early date of Mar.24th. First returns were
from Nov. 7th.
Monthly maxima:
|
Jan |
Feb |
Mar |
Apr |
May |
Jun |
Jul |
Aug |
Sep |
Oct |
Nov |
Dec |
|
24 |
16 |
9 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
22 |
27 |
RUDDY DUCK
Occasional visitor of annual occurrence. A
good year with records as follows: 1f/imm on Apr.16th, 1f/imm on Sept.29th,
1m and 2f from Oct.4th to Nov.9th, a pair remaining until Nov.18th and the
male alone was present until Dec.4th.
SPARROWHAWK
Common resident that breeds nearby.
BUZZARD
Regular visitor. Five records; singletons on
Feb.25th, Apr.20th, Aug.24th, Sept.8th and Sept.27th
KESTREL
Common resident. One pair reared two young.
MERLIN
Rare visitor. Three sightings of a male
between Feb.2nd and 22nd (CGHW et al.) constitute only the second occurrence
on the site. The first record was in 1996.
HOBBY
Common summer visitor. Up to six birds were
recorded between Apr.26th and Sept.16th.
PEREGRINE
Infrequent visitor. A good year with four
records of singletons on Jan.8th (TJC), Feb.17th (BA), Dec.14th (CRG) and
Dec.24th (MP). This continues the upward trend as the species becomes more
widespread in the UK. There are records in each of the last five years.
RED LEGGED PARTRIDGE
Formerly bred. Several records in December
undoubtedly related to locally introduced birds.
PHEASANT
Common resident.
WATER RAIL
Winter visitor. Up to two were present in both
early and late winter periods.
MOORHEN
An abundant resident.
Monthly maxima:
|
Jan |
Feb |
Mar |
Apr |
May |
Jun |
Jul |
Aug |
Sep |
Oct |
Nov |
Dec |
|
9 |
4 |
8 |
13 |
10 |
- |
- |
- |
25 |
22 |
25 |
17 |
COOT
Abundant resident.
Monthly maxima:
|
Jan |
Feb |
Mar |
Apr |
May |
Jun |
Jul |
Aug |
Sep |
Oct |
Nov |
Dec |
|
378 |
52 |
39 |
25 |
42 |
38 |
89 |
116 |
146 |
182 |
234 |
228 |
OYSTERCATCHER
Occasional visitor. A good year with three
records: 1, Mar.19th (CJ), 1, Apr.20th (IT) and 1, May 4th (IHB). Something
of a return to the past with records in only in two of the last seven years.
LITTLE RINGED PLOVER
Summer visitor and passage migrant. Recorded
from Mar.16th until Jul. 8th. Five pairs were on the site but only one bred
successfully (and that was on the reserve!) rearing two young.
RINGED PLOVER
Summer visitor and passage migrant which
formerly bred. Four records: 2, May 17th, 1, May 18th, 1, May 23rd and 1,
Sept.15th.
LAPWING
Common resident and winter visitor. Nine pairs
attempted to breed rearing a total of three young. The maximum count was of
1100 on Jan.15th (IHB) a site record*.
Monthly maxima:
|
Jan |
Feb |
Mar |
Apr |
May |
Jun |
Jul |
Aug |
Sep |
Oct |
Nov |
Dec |
|
1100* |
600 |
151 |
12 |
16 |
65 |
100 |
300 |
150 |
110 |
150 |
350 |
DUNLIN
Regular passage migrant. A poor year with
singletons on May 25th to 26th and Jul.26th.
COMMON SNIPE
Common passage migrant and winter visitor.
Recorded until May 26th and from Sept. 5th
BLACK TAILED GODWIT
Scarce visitor. One on Mar.30th (GWB) is the
first for that month and the earliest ever.
CURLEW
Irregular visitor. One on Apr.23rd.
REDSHANK
Summer visitor and passage migrant. One on
Feb.2nd before returning birds from Mar.12th to Jul.7th. Up to two pairs
were present on the reserve until June, one successfully rearing one young.
GREENSHANK
Regular passage migrant. The records were as
follows; 1, May 20th and 6, Aug. 7th.
GREEN SANDPIPER
Winter visitor and common passage migrant. Up
to four and two birds were present in the early and late winter periods
respectively. Recorded until Apr.26th and from Jun.26th. Records were mainly
of 1 to 3 birds, with a maxima of 5 on Mar.21st.
WOOD SANDPIPER
Occasional visitor of annual occurrence. The
only record was of one on the relatively early date of Apr.24th (EN et al.)
COMMON SANDPIPER
Common passage migrant. A fairly poor year
with records in spring of 1/4 birds between Apr.2nd and May 18th. Returns of
1/2 were from Jul.29th to Sept.8th.
MEDITERRANEAN GULL
Uncommon visitor. One first-winter on Feb.9th
(IHB) was the only record.
BLACK HEADED GULL
Very common visitor. Recorded in all months.
The largest count was of 730 on Feb.16th.
COMMON GULL
Common winter visitor. The maximum count of
550 on Feb.16th (1HB) was a site record.
LESSER BLACK BACKED GULL
Very common visitor. Birds roosted regularly
on the Hampshire part of the site from late summer.
HERRING GULL
Winter visitor but in reduced numbers. Small
numbers roosted occasionally with Lesser Black Backed Gulls.
YELLOW LEGGED HERRING GULL
Regular visitor of annual occurrence. Records
of 2 adults, Jul.23rd and 1 third winter on Dec.28th.
GREAT BLACK BACKED GULL
Formerly frequent winter visitor with numbers
of records declining. The only record was of 1 adult on Nov.9th. All records
required again for next year.
COMMON TERN
Summer visitor and passage migrant. Recorded
from Apr.14th. 16 pairs attempted to breed on Tern Island and all were
successful rearing a total of 16 young. The nests were deserted by 4 pairs
in July. One pair also attempted to breed unsuccessfully on the Hampshire
part of the complex. Birds have now reared a total of 48 young on the
reserve in the last three years. Breeding birds and young lingered in the
area until Jul.27th.
STOCK DOVE
Common resident.
WOOD PIGEON
Abundant resident. A maximum count of 1325 on
Nov.3rd.
COLLARED DOVE
Common resident breeding nearby.
TURTLE DOVE
Occasional visitor. Two records of singletons
on May 11th and Aug.24th.
CUCKOO
Summer visitor. Four records of up to 2 birds
between Apr.21st and Jun.1st. The first breeding considered possible.
BARN OWL
Formerly bred. Singleton on Jan. 1st relates
to the bird present in December 2001.
LITTLE OWL
Moderately common resident. Breeding was
successful with three territories.
TAWNY OWL
Moderately common resident. Breeding was
successful with birds present in 2 territories.
SWIFT
Numerous summer visitor. Recorded between May
1st and Jul.26th.
KINGFISHER
Moderately common resident. Two pairs bred
successfully.
GREEN WOODPECKER
Common resident.
GREAT SPOTTED WOODPECKER
Common resident.
LESSER SPOTTED WOODPECKER
Occasional visitor. One on Dec. 8th
WOODLARK
Irregular visitor that has bred. Two on
Aug.31st probably related to post breeding dispersal from nearby sites.
SKYLARK
Common resident and winter visitor. Four
singing males held territory. Numbers appear to be declining.
SAND MARTIN
Common summer visitor. Recorded between
Mar.22nd and Sept.21st. Breeding occurred on the new workings on the Hants
side of the complex but no specific counts were made.
SWALLOW
Common summer visitor. Recorded between
Apr.3rd and Oct.4th.
HOUSE MARTIN
Abundant summer visitor.
MEADOW P1PIT
Common winter visitor and passage migrant that
has summered.
YELLOW WAGTAIL
Moderately common passage migrant that has
bred. A poor year with the only records as follows; 1, May 5th and 1,
Sept.3rd.
GREY WAGTAIL
Moderately common resident. Two pairs bred
successfully.
PIED WAGTAIL
Common resident and winter visitor.
WREN
Abundant resident.
DUNNOCK
Common resident.
ROBIN
Very common resident.
WHINCHAT
Moderately common passage migrant. Records as
follows: In spring, 1, Apr.21st and 1, May 4th In autumn, 2, Sept.7th to 8th
and 1, Sept.15th.
STONECHAT
Irregular resident and passage migrant. In the
early winter there were up to 3 present. In the late year 1 or 2 birds were
recorded from Jul.28th with a maximum of 5 on Nov. 3rd.
WHEATEAR
Moderately common passage migrant. In spring;
2, Apr.27th to 28th, 2, May 4th and 1, May 16th. In autumn; 1, Aug. 18th
BLACKBIRD
Common resident.
FIELDFARE
Common winter visitor. Recorded until Mar.24th
and from Oct.26th. Maximum counts were of 200 on Mar. 12th and 120 on
Dec.28th.
SONG THRUSH
Common resident.
REDWING
Very common winter visitor. Recorded from Oct.
12th.
MISTLE THRUSH
Common resident.
SEDGE WARBLER
Moderately common summer visitor. Recorded
from Apr. 1st to Sept.8th. Eight singing males held territory (cf 8 in 2001)
REED WARBLER
Moderately common summer visitor. Recorded
from May 4th. Four singing males held territory (cf 5 in 2001).
LESSER WHITETHROAT
Summer visitor. Recorded from May 4th. Two
singing males held territory.
WHITETHROAT Very common summer visitor.
Recorded between Apr.6th and Sept. 7th. Approximately 13 singing males held
territory.
GARDEN WARBLER
Very common summer visitor. Recorded from Apr.
16th. At least 19 singing males held territory (cf 13 in 2001).
BLACKCAP
Common summer visitor and occasional winter
visitor. Recorded between Mar.30th and Sept.2lst.
CHIFFCHAFF Common summer visitor and
regular winter visitor. Recorded between Mar. 5th and Oct. 12th. Four
singing males held territory.
WILLOW WARBLER
Common summer visitor. Recorded from Apr.4th
until Sept.8th. Four singing males held territory.
GOLDCREST
Common winter visitor and passage migrant.
SPOTTED FLYCATCHER
Regular passage migrant that may breed. The
only record was of 1 on Sept. 15th.
LONG TAILED TIT
Abundant resident.
COAL TIT
Uncommon visitor. The only record was of 1 on
Aug. 17th.
BLUE TIT
Abundant resident.
GREAT TIT
Abundant resident.
NUTHATCH
Moderately common resident.
TREECREEPER
Moderately common resident.
JAY
Common resident.
MAGPIE
Common resident.
JACKDAW
Common resident.
ROOK
Regular visitor.
CARRION CROW
Common resident.
STARLING
Common resident.
HOUSE SPARROW
Common resident nearby.
CHAFFINCH
Abundant resident and winter visitor. Maximum
count of 150 on Feb.2nd.
BRAMBLING
Regular winter visitor usually in small
numbers. A very good year with a large flock remaining from 2001 on fields
to the west of the reserve. Counts were of 150, Feb.9th, 100, Mar.9th, 30,
Mar.31st and 1, Apr. 5th
GREENFINCH
Common resident and winter visitor. Maximum
count of 20 on Jan.27th.
GOLDFINCH
Very common resident and winter visitor.
SISKIN
Common winter visitor. The maximum count was
200 on Feb.16th.
LINNET
Moderately common resident and winter visitor.
The maximum count was 25 on
Dec.24th. Breeding successful.
LESSER REDPOLL
Moderately common winter visitor. The maximum
count was 70 on Mar.22nd.
BULLFINCH
Moderately common resident.
YELLOWHAMMER
Resident in small numbers. At least one
singing male held territory. Breeding successful.
REED BUNTING
Moderately common resident. The maximum count
was 30 on Jan.27th.
OTHER RECORDS
BLACK SWAN
Three on Nov.28th.
LIST OF OBSERVERS
|
B.M.Archer
D.Broadley
Dr I.H.Brown
J.M.Clark
K.Crick
C.Davis
S.F.G.Farmer
T.Fuller
N.R.Godden
R.J.Godden
G.Harland
C.Jones
R.Murfitt
J.O’Brien
C.Proudley
G.Randall
G.J.S.Rowland
J.B.Sheridan
G.C.Stephenson
Mrs L.D.M.Tanner
M.Walford
M.Ward
J.Westmacott
J.E.Warren |
Dr K.B.Briggs
G.Brookes
G.Bryant
R.Crawford
T.J.Crompton
Mrs S.Farmer
A.Ford
C.R.Gent
R.E.Godden
B.Harland
J.Heritage
R.Kersham
E.Napper
N.R.Peters
M.Radbourn
Mrs C.Rose
R.Rudman
N.Silver
J.C.Tanner
I.Twyford
J.Ward
R.Ward
Mrs R.Westmacott
|
[Previous Year]
[Previous
Section]
[Contents List]
[Next Section] [Next Year]
APPENDIX C
EVERSLEY GRAVEL PITS (inc MOOR GREEN LAKES)
BIRD SPECIES LIST 1990-2002
Click here to open the spreadsheet with Excel (43Kb)
If you do not have Excel, the following link
provides a pdf version
Click here for a pdf version (45Kb)
Click the Back button on your Internet Browser
(I.e. Explorer) to come back to this Report
[Previous Year]
[Previous
Section]
[Contents List]
[Next Section] [Next Year]
APPENDIX D
NOTES AND GUIDELINES ON BIRD RECORDING
Following the creation of Moor Green Lakes
(part of the Eversley Gravel Pit complex) as a nature reserve, it is
necessary to maintain a detailed log of birds using the site in order to
monitor bird populations, with particular reference to conservation
management carried out on the site by the Moor Green Lakes Group and RMC.
These guidelines are designed to assist any persons visiting the site who
wish to submit their records. The collection of such data is an important
function of the group and all contributions, no matter how small are
welcomed.
Recording Area
The
boundaries of the site for recording purposes are defined as:
| |
a) |
South of the
Lower Sandhurst Road |
| |
b) |
West of Mill
Lane |
| |
c) |
East of
Longwater Road |
| |
d) |
North of the
golf course access track running from the Reading Road to Mill Lane. |
Information required
Ideally
records should be submitted on Eversley Gravel Pit recording forms available
from the recorder (please enclose an SAE). Records should be submitted every
3-4 months (or more frequently!) so that the log can be kept as up to date
as possible. Less frequent visitors may wish to submit their records
annually.
Where
possible the following information should be provided:
| |
1) |
Name of
species (include age/sex if known) |
| |
2) |
Number of
individuals (accurate counts particularly useful) |
| |
3) |
Date of
observation (and time if a fly over only sighting or short stay record) |
| |
4) |
Site location |
| |
5) |
Other
observations such as unusual behaviour or direction off flight of birds
flying over, etc. |
| |
6) |
Observer(s) initials. Records not submitted on forms should also include
name and address |
| |
7) |
Accompanying field notes if required. |
The species list for the site
at Appendix C includes a code number in the left hand column. This refers to
the type of records required for that species. The full details are:
| |
1*= |
All records
required. Please submit notes on the sighting with the record. These
notes should include details of the diagnostic identification features
which were observed at the time, other species nearby, the duration and
distance of the observation, weather conditions, optical aids used and
previous experience of the species. |
| |
1 = |
All records
required. |
| |
2 = |
Whole site
counts, reserve area counts, breeding summary (number of pairs and
young, singing males), early/late dates for summer and winter visitors,
movements, unusual dates and interesting behaviour. |
| |
3 = |
Breeding
summary only. |
| |
4 =
|
Only unusual
records for the species e.g. high counts, early breeding records. |
Records should be sent to: lan Brown, 4 Evesham Walk, Sandhurst, Berks. GU46
0YU
Sightings of birds in category 1*, would be gratefully received by phone
(01344 778412), particularly if still present, to enable dissemination of
information to other interested observers!
[Previous Year]
[Previous
Section]
[Contents List]
[Next Section] [Next
Year]
APPENDIX E
NOTES AND GUIDELINES ON DRAGONFLY RECORDING
Any person visiting the
site who wishes to submit dragonfly/damselfly records may do so. Any
attributable records are gratefully received. Observers may add their
records to the monthly dragonfly posted in both Grove and Colebrook hides.
Alternatively records of a
more detailed nature may be submitted at any time direct to the recorder but
for preference before the end of October. If submitted after the end of
October the data will be logged on to the Reserve’s database but may be too
late for inclusion in the Annual Report.
Records can be presented
in any form that best suits the observer but should include:
|
Observer’s
name and address |
|
Date/Time/Weather |
|
Site
location, i.e.: |
| |
Colebrook Lake North (CLN) |
| |
Colebrook Lake South (CLS) |
| |
Colebrook Cut (CC) |
| |
Grove Lake (GL) |
| |
Horseshoe Lake |
| |
River Blackwater and path (BR) |
|
|
|
Name(s) of
species observed |
|
|
|
For
each species observed at each site an estimate of the number of: |
| |
Adults |
| |
copulating pairs |
| |
ovipositing females |
All records should be sent
to the Recorder: Ken Crick, 29 Village Way, Yateley, Hants GU46 7SE.
Information on sightings of rare or unusual species would be welcomed by
phone (01252 872508).
[Previous Year]
[Previous
Section]
[Contents List]
[Next Section] [Next Year]
APPENDIX F
pH SURVEY 2001 - 2002
Ken
Crick
Last
year’s report went to print with the year long pH survey incomplete due to
the need to meet the August issue dead line. The graphs contributing to this
Chapter repeat last year’s data along with the unpublished data set that
completes the 12-month period, ending in June 2002.
The
upwelling of water that clearly characterized the spring on the northern
shore of Colebrook Lake (A2) completely disappeared on the 24 January 2002,
when cattle grazing the site entered the water at this point compressing the
bank. As of the 23 September 2002 the upwelling was still not apparent.
Water levels also rose significantly in January and throughout the remainder
of the trial period the location of the spring could only be estimated.
Temperature levels at this point no longer remained near constant, but
followed the rise and fall of the lake as a whole.
It is
interesting to note that despite quite large excursions in pH throughout the
year at all the measurement locations, nine of the locations recorded pH
levels for June 2002 that were within 0.3 of the June 2001 data. The largest
disparity between the June 2001 and June 2002 figures occurred at the
disrupted spring (A2), where the variance was plus 0.8.
It would
appear that the results published here are generally in line with average
water conditions found elsewhere. John Clegg in his book Freshwater Life,
1974 edition Appendix I published by Warne ISBN 0723217629, states ".... in
average water, the pH will be at its highest in the summer when
photosynthesis is rapid and lowest in winter when much of the vegetation of
the past summer is decomposing, but it will vary from day to day, hour to
hour and from place to place, in the same lake". Typical values for one
locality are for weedy ponds in summer pH 8; stagnant ditches rich in
decomposing matter 7.2; ponds with much animal life and only average numbers
of plants 7.8 .For those with a passing interest in p11, what it is and its
relative importance to freshwater life, this book is worth a visit.
Spot
checks were taken at location A2 on the 26 July and the 28 August 2002,
which resulted in readings of pH 8.8 and 7.1 respectively. By the 17
September the pH at A2 had dipped a further three points to 6.8.
RMC
Aggregates provided the Reserve with a water level gauge board at the
beginning of January 2002 and it is located in the cut opposite the door to
Colebrook Hide. Fluctuations in water levels are of interest to the
management team in the future control of Crassula helmsii and a quantitative
assessment of the control of water levels by the current sluice.
MOOR GREEN pH SURVEY
pH VERSES WEEK NUMBER. Week No 1= 3rd week in June 2001. Week
32=2nd week in June 2002



[Previous Year]
[Previous
Section]
[Contents List]
[Next Section] [Next Year]
APPENDIX G
NEST BOX REVIEWS FROM 2000 AND 2001
Dr Kevin Briggs
NEST BOXES 2000
The breeding season was delayed by cold weather and
truncated by a wet and windy period in late May/early June that affected the
fledging of many young birds. The occupancy rate was 59%, very low. Hornets
occupied one Tit box for the first time.
1) Great Tit
Ten pairs of birds occupied nest boxes with the first egg
being laid on 14 April. The mean laying date was 16 April (sd 1.9 days).
Clutches were large (mean 9.5, sd 1.8 eggs) and no pairs deserted.
From the 95 eggs laid 86 hatched (mean brood size at hatching 8.6, sd 1.5)
but only 34 fledged. The mean brood size at fledging was 4.4, sd 2.3
young, but as 3 broods died and some pairs fledged only 2 or 3 young the
mean brood size per nesting attempt was 3.4 (sd 2.9) young.
2) Blue Tit
The number of Blue Tits using the nest boxes is
declining, as they prefer the Bat boxes. There has been a steady increase in
the number of Bat boxes involved; 2 in 1998, 4 in 1999 and 8 in 2000. So the
overall population is not decreasing, it is just that they cannot be
monitored effectively.
Only 3 pairs used boxes and the mean laying date was 15
April (sd 3.2 days). Clutches were small (mean 9.3, sd 3.0 eggs), but
hatching success high (mean brood 8.6, sd 3.0 young). The poor weather,
however, reduced the number of young fledged to only 13 (mean brood size
4.3, sd 2.1)
3) Tawny Owl
One pair fledged two young from a clutch of 2 eggs laid
on 20 March.
4) Little Owl
Three young were fledged from a clutch of 4 eggs laid on
21 April by one pair.
5) Stock Dove
Only the first broods were followed for 4 pairs that bred
in boxes. Mean laying date was 22 April (sd 11.2 days) for the four clutches
of 2 eggs, which produced 5 fledged young (mean 1.25, sd 0.5)
6)
Mandarin Duck
A poor year with only one pair being recorded in a nest
box. The clutch of 12 eggs, laid from 20 April, was successful, hatching 12
ducklings that successfully left the nest box.
NEST BOXES 2001
The foot and mouth epidemic delayed the start of the Nest
Box Monitoring and prevented the laying dates of clutches from being clearly
established in some cases. The occupancy rate was 76%, which is average, but
to this total could also be added 2 Hornet nests and 2 quarter-built Blue
Tit nests that then used Bat boxes in the same tree.
1) Great Tit
Sixteen pairs laid in the nest boxes, ranging from 18
April to 10 May (mean date 27 April, sd 7.5 days). However, in one
box a female was found dead on a clutch of 4 eggs. This was removed and
subsequently another pair occupied the box and raised young. This
effectively gives 17 nesting attempts. Unfortunately, the largest clutch (12
eggs) was predated by a Great Spotted Woodpecker during incubation. The 17
clutches ranged in size from 4 — 12 (mean size 8.35, sd 1.90) eggs
and from the 142 eggs, 112 hatched (mean brood size for all 17 pairs 6.58,
sd 2.7 young). For the 15 successful pairs the mean brood size at
hatching was 7.46, sd 1.3 young. Despite the poor weather the fledging
success was high with successful pairs fledging on average 6.0 (sd 1.03
young) and all nesting attempts raising a mean of 5.29 (sd 2.16) young.
2) Blue Tit
Only three pairs laid eggs and of these one deserted a
clutch of 4 eggs. The mean laying date was 24 April (sd 3 days). The two
remaining pairs (clutches of 14 and 11 eggs) fledged 20 young between them.
The breeding success for all pairs is 6.67 (sd 4.9) young per breeding
attempt. The trend for this species to use Bat boxes continues, 7 pairs
nested again this year.
3) Tawny Owl
One pair laid 2 eggs in a nest box and had fledged 2
young by 21 May.
4) Stock Dove
Only 2 pairs bred and reared 6 young in 5 nesting
attempts.
5) Mandarin Duck
The normal clutch size for Mandarin is 7 — 12 eggs and is
usually 9 per female. One box had 18 eggs on 3 May and must have resulted
from 2 females laying in the same box, brood parasitism. Surprisingly only
one female incubated and hatched 16 eggs; often such clutches are deserted.
The brood of 14 young was seen shortly after hatching in late May. Mandarin
occupied three other boxes, but one clutch of 5 eggs was deserted. Judging
by the feathers in the nest box, the female had a close encounter with a
Tawny Owl. In total 38 eggs were laid and 32 young hatched and dispatched
from the boxes by 4, or possibly 5 females. Mean laying date was
thought to be 25 April (sd 4.0 days).
[Previous Year]
[Previous
Section]
[Contents List]
[Next Section] [Next Year]
APPENDIX H
MOOR GREEN LAKES GROUP COMMITTEE MEMBERS
2002-2003
| Officer
|
Committee
Post/Responsibilities |
| Ken Crick* |
Chairman / Report
Editor / Recorder for Dragonfly and Damselfly |
| Dr Delphine Hoyle |
Vice-Chairman and Recorder
for Plants |
| Peter Scott |
Secretary
/ Recorder for Reptiles |
| Sue Dent |
Blackwater Valley
Countryside Service Representative |
| Amanda Simpson-Atkins |
Sunday Working Party
Organiser |
| Chris Rose |
Treasurer
/ Report Compiler |
| Sheila Farmer |
Membership Secretary |
| Dr Kevin Briggs* |
Reserve Consultant |
| Dr lan Brown |
Recorder for Birds |
| Katrina Slocombe |
Recorder for Mammals |
| Sue Proudley |
Recorder for Butterflies |
| Steve Farmer |
Reserve Manager /
Newsletter Editor |
| Peter Standley* |
|
* Represents Moor Green Lakes Group on the Steering Group.
NOTE
At the A.G.M of February
2003 Ken Crick resigned as Chairman of the Group and Peter Scott took up the
post. Robert Godden then took his position as Committee Secretary.
Peter Scott can be
contacted on ppscott(at)aol.com
[Previous Year]
[Previous
Section]
[Contents List]
[Next Section] [Next Year]
APPENDIX I
Moor Green Lakes Nature Reserve Reference
Library
The contents of the library so far collected
are listed below.
| Site survey data |
|
| Anon.1993. |
Plant list for Moor Green
Lakes. (Farnborough College student report). |
| Briggs, K. 2001 |
Moor Green Lakes Nature
Reserve; ornithological monitoring 2000. |
| Brown, I. 1993 |
Eversley Gravel Pits Bird
Species List. |
| BVRCMS 2000 |
Survey data. (Includes a
number of minor surveys with Moor Green records). |
| Crick, K. 1999 |
Moor Green Lakes Odonata
population survey, benchmark Report 1997-99. |
| Gannaway, H. 1997 |
The distribution of small
mammals at Moor Green Lakes - (Farnborough College student report) |
| Hall C, 1991 |
Botanical survey |
| Hearn, R, 1993 |
The management of disused
mineral workings as habitat for waterbirds. (Farnborough College student
report). |
| Lovesey, E. 1997 |
Spider survey |
| Matthes, G. 1997 |
Hoverfly surveys 1995
-1997. |
| Smith, M. 2001 |
Bracknell Forest Borough
Council Invertebrate Survey 2000. |
| Tomlinson D. 1995 |
A live trapping
investigation of small mammal populations at Moor Green Lakes Nature
Reserve. (Farnborough College student report). |
| Hall C, 2001 |
A survey of Aquatic and
Wetland Plants, August - September 2001 |
| |
|
| Site management |
|
| Fourt D, 2000 |
Moor Green Lakes pH &
liming records. |
| McAll, G. Undated |
Management Plan for Moor
Green Lakes (draft plan for BBONT, never adopted). |
| |
|
| Group administration |
|
| Annual reports: |
A complete set from the
1st report in 1994. |
| Moor Green News: |
A full set of the Group
Newsletters |
| Moor Green Lakes Group
Management Committee: |
A complete set of minutes |
I would like to request that if anybody has
information about the reserve, however small, please could they deposit a
copy in the library. I shall be able to copy it and return the originals.
If any body would like to view the information
please contact me Steve Bailey on 01252 331353 to make arrangements.
[Previous Year]
[Previous
Section]
[Contents List]
[Next Section] [Next Year]
APPENDIX J
Map of the Reserve

Habitat Map
[Previous Year]
[Previous
Section]
[Contents List]
[Next Section] [Next Year]

Manor Farm Restoration Plan - 2002

[Previous Year]
[Previous
Section]
[Contents List]
[Next Section] [Next Year]
ANNEX
MOOR
GREEN LAKES NATURE RESERVE
TEN-YEAR SUMMARY, 1993 TO 2003
CREATION OF THE RESERVE
RMC Aggregates (Southern) Ltd [RMC], through its
predecessor company, purchased the land now developed as the Moor Green
Lakes Nature Reserve in the late 1960’s. Planning permission to extract sand
and gravel was granted by Berkshire County Council in 1982 and required RMC
to implement an ambitious restoration scheme in order to both replace and
create wildlife habitats. Extraction commenced in 1983 and finished five
years later. By 1992 the Reserve of 36 hectares was largely formed,
comprising wildflower meadows, plantations, scrapes, islands and open water.

In 1998 RMC’s development of the Reserve, and adjoining
areas forming part of the same quarry, was recognised by the presentation of
a restoration award by the European Aggregates Association
THE MOOR GREEN LAKES GROUP
The Moor Green Lakes Nature Reserve Steering Group was
formed in 1993 to provide overall management of the Reserve and continues to
fulfil that task. It originally comprised representatives of RMC, Berkshire
County Council, Blackwater Valley Recreation and Countryside Management
Service, the local Naturalists' Trust (BBONT) and two consultants and
remains in a similar form today. An early decision of the Group was to
involve the local community in a support group for practical management,
data recording and interpretation. To that end, the Steering Group hosted a
public meeting on 28th April 1993 at Eversley Village Hall "with a view of
forming a Local Support Group for the Reserve at the former quarrying
operations".
The Moor Green Lakes Group sprang from this and had its
inaugural meeting at the same venue on 19th May 1993 to assess priority
tasks that could be undertaken. By 1994 it had a membership of 60 and a
committee of 6, with Peter Standley as chairman, Kevin Briggs as secretary
and Mark Taylor as treasurer.
A hide provided by RMC was erected by Colebrook Lake and
opened on 6th July 1994 by Councillors Trembake and Collett. The first
Annual Report was produced. In 1995 guided walks were taken round the
Reserve and the first Annual General Meeting was held. The second hide was
opened on 24th September 1997 by John Craven of the BBC’s Countryfile
programme.
By 1999 there were 300 members and a periodic Newsletter
(Moor Green News) was introduced. In 2001 Peter Standley stood down as
chairman after eight years of excellent work and Ken Crick took office,
enthusiastically producing a new Management Plan for the Reserve. Committee
members were involved in advising RMC over the restoration plans for the
adjoining Manor Farm quarrying operations with proposals for the
establishment of reed beds. In 2003 the group has over 400 members.

CONSERVATION
Management of the Reserve is all-important if diversity
is to be maintained and enhanced.
Practical work by volunteers started in January 1994.
Viewing slots were cut and islands and scrapes were cleared. Compartments
were fenced to allow cattle-grazing in rotation around the Reserve the
following year. Paths were resurfaced to allow disabled access to the hide,
which was unfortunately vandalised and so had to be locked. In 1997 the
perimeter fencing was made fully stock-proof, new signs erected and rafts
floated for breeding terns (plus Canada Geese and Coots!). Volunteers
continued the annual round of scrub-cutting, bramble, scrape and island
clearance, gate-closing and cattle-watching.
In 1998 contractors were used for tree
felling for the first time. Bat boxes (43) and bird boxes (35)
were erected and
monitored annually (bringing in hornets to the Reserve!). Car park
improvements were made, partly to combat the vandalism and theft which had
become a problem, and more new signs were erected. In 2002 the new
Management Plan was completed with easy-to-follow guidelines. The anti-mink
fence was erected on Tern Island, a reptile hibernaculum was created and
efforts were begun to eliminate (or at least limit) the invasive Australian
Swamp Stonecrop.
Wildlife surveys are important in assessing the success
of the management programme, as well as providing results that are
interesting in themselves. Birds, dragonflies, butterflies and plants have
been monitored on a fairly consistent basis for much of the last ten years,
while other groups have also been surveyed, but less regularly.
BIRDS
The newly-created water bodies at the
Reserve had attracted over 130 species by 1994 when specific recording
started. The site was notable locally for breeding Ringed Plover, Little
Ringed Plover, Redshank, Lapwing and Common Tern, all of which used the
gravel islands.

Yearly recording has highlighted a succession of
interesting passage birds and notable ‘firsts’ for the Reserve:
-
Temmick’s Stint and Great Grey Shrike were
new species in 1993;
-
the following year, Garganey, Nightingale,
Firecrest and Crossbill were added to the records, with a long-staying
Smew and 79 Goosanders providing a winter spectacle;
-
in 1995 a wintering Red-necked Grebe was
present, in summer the feral Snow Geese bred on site for the first time
and an introduced Barn Owl bred nearby and hunted the Reserve. A Hoopoe
was present from September until January of the following year;
-
a Black-necked Grebe, Red Kite, Glaucous
Gull and Bean Goose increased the species tally in 1996, with improved
management techniques increasing the winter Wigeon
count to 256 and Goosanders to 124;
-
new birds continued to
occur in 1997: Ring-billed Gull, Bittern and Honey Buzzard were all logged
and 184 Goosanders roosted in January;
-
in 1998, 391 Coot
wintered and Gadwall numbers reached 210. A Shore Lark caused great
excitement and Marsh Harrier, Nightjar and Little Egret occurred on the
Reserve;
-
the seventh Annual Report
recorded monthly maximum totals of wildfowl and included the latest
addition to the Reserve’s list of a gale-blown Great Skua in July;
-
2000 brought a Red-necked
Phalarope in May and 12 Hobbies together in June. A complete Common Bird
Census of the Reserve recorded 57 breeding species with 400 territories;
-
the year 2001 hosted a
record 585 Wigeon and three new species - Green Winged Teal, Lesser
Yellowlegs and Ring-necked Parakeet - bringing the Reserve’s all-time
tally to 201 species.
MAMMALS
In
1993 twenty-one species of mammal had been reported on the
Reserve ranging from Pygmy Shrew to Roe Deer. Water Shrew was first recorded
in 1994 and Weasel in 2000. Roe Deer are most easily seen with up to 10
together, but mammal-trapping has shown Wood Mice to be the most numerous.
Water Vole is the only species to have gone unrecorded.
Specialist surveys of bats have revealed 6 species to be
using the Reserve. The large numbers of flying insects found above the lakes
and the adjacent river form an important food source, and the site also
provides valuable links between the river and potential roost sites on
Finchampstead Ridges.
AMPHIBIANS, REPTILES AND FISH

Common Frog, Common Toad, Grass Snake and Adder have been
found on the Reserve. Common Lizard and Slow Worm are likely to be present,
but have not yet been reported. Only 5 species of fish have been
recorded.
INVERTEBRATES
Dragonflies
The locality has long been a hot spot for this group and
between 1986 and 1994 twenty species were reported. The tally grew in the
following two years with Four-spotted Chaser and Yellow-winged Darter
occurring. Detailed systematic monitoring from 1998 brought in the Downy
Emerald Dragonfly in June and a knowledge of how individual populations were
fairing in specific areas of the Reserve. 2001 was an excellent year with 22
species recorded including three sightings of the Golden-ringed Dragonfly.
Populations of most species decreased in 2002, for reasons which are not yet
clear.
Butterflies and Moths
By 1991 the Reserve area had yielded 21 species of
butterfly, but none of them very abundant. The following three years
increased the total with Large Skipper, Grayling and Small Blue being
reported. Marbled White was recorded in 1996. The monitoring now records 19
to 21 species per year with weather playing a major role in perceived
abundance. Moths have only been light-trapped once, in 1995, when 62
species were recorded in June and July, including Elephant and Poplar Hawk
Moths.
 
Other Groups
Little regular monitoring of other invertebrates has been
undertaken and recorders are being encouraged to undertake this. Occasional
surveys indicate considerable variety both on the Reserve and in the
immediate locality:
-
a survey of aquatic invertebrates in 2000 found
numerous species of freshwater snail, crustaceans, mites and several
insect groups (including dragonfly nymphs);
-
a survey by Bracknell District Council in 2000,
including Grove Lake, produced 208 invertebrate species, including a rare
cuckoo wasp;
-
a survey in April 2001 recorded 199 species of beetles
and spiders, over 100 of them previously unrecorded on the Reserve.

PLANTS
A general survey of the Reserve’s locality in 1982
recorded 96 species. Systematic surveying from 1993 to 1995 increased
this total. Exciting plants such as Fen Bedstraw, Hairy Tare and
Sharp-flowered Rush all occur.
Quantified investigations of permanent quadrats have been
used since 1998 to monitor the sown-flower meadows and assess the grazing
regime. The original seed mixture included 23 species, of which 18 were
found in or close to the quadrats in 2002. Predominant species are Ox-eye
Daisy, Black Knapweed and Ribwort Plantain, with Bents and Yorkshire Fog
being the most prominent grasses.
The plants are not only important in their own right.
Many of them provide food and habitat for a variety of animal groups.
Nettle, for example, while not visually attractive, is vital to certain
butterflies; hence its increase on the Reserve is welcome, provided it does
not reduce the variety of other species.

An aquatic plant survey in 2001 found 76 species with
Colebrook North being the most diverse, having 32 species. The Reserve held
2 nationally-rare species (Pillwort and Hairlike Pondweed), as well as 4
regionally and 6 locally-rare species, giving the Reserve an important
ecological status. Unfortunately it also held four alien species, one of
which, Australian Swamp Stonecrop, is a huge conservation problem.
SUMMARY
The survey results described above show that the Group’s
efforts to maintain diverse habitats on the Reserve have been largely
successful. As membership continues to grow, we can be confident that
conditions for wildlife will be sustained for the foreseeable future.
Indeed, as the restoration of the Manor Farm site is completed, we hope to
extend our activities to include the new areas. In particular, creation of a
large reed bed will add new habitat and increase both our responsibilities
and the interesting wildlife on view.
Original text and
photographs by
DR. KEVIN
BRIGGS
[Last
Year]
[Previous
Section]
[Contents List]
[Top of Page]
[Next Section] [Next Year]
|